IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] I-D Action: draft-ietf-v6ops-ula-usage-recommendations-02.txt

"Liubing (Leo)" <leo.liubing@huawei.com> Sat, 22 February 2014 09:53 UTC

Return-Path: <leo.liubing@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B23901A0051 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 22 Feb 2014 01:53:38 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.749
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.749 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.548, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id I4JxJSnAwNI9 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 22 Feb 2014 01:53:37 -0800 (PST)
Received: from lhrrgout.huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [194.213.3.17]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C5FD1A0035 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Sat, 22 Feb 2014 01:53:36 -0800 (PST)
Received: from 172.18.7.190 (EHLO lhreml203-edg.china.huawei.com) ([172.18.7.190]) by lhrrg02-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.3.7-GA FastPath queued) with ESMTP id BBJ70314; Sat, 22 Feb 2014 09:53:31 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from LHREML403-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.201.5.217) by lhreml203-edg.huawei.com (172.18.7.221) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.158.1; Sat, 22 Feb 2014 09:53:10 +0000
Received: from NKGEML404-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.98.56.35) by lhreml403-hub.china.huawei.com (10.201.5.217) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.158.1; Sat, 22 Feb 2014 09:53:31 +0000
Received: from NKGEML506-MBS.china.huawei.com ([169.254.4.237]) by nkgeml404-hub.china.huawei.com ([10.98.56.35]) with mapi id 14.03.0158.001; Sat, 22 Feb 2014 17:53:26 +0800
From: "Liubing (Leo)" <leo.liubing@huawei.com>
To: Owen DeLong <owen@delong.com>
Thread-Topic: [v6ops] I-D Action: draft-ietf-v6ops-ula-usage-recommendations-02.txt
Thread-Index: AQHPKWgMo43RzbooVkmZSkAdeWvl75qz/igAgAD96wCAAR80gIABVkQAgAA9hYCAAAN1gIAAC5wAgAEHz4CAADwWAIAAImUAgAAJQ4CAAK9RAIABJvEAgACbWYCAAH+0gIAAhjSAgAA1BACAAMiTgIAACFaAgAAUUQCAAFnrAIABXEwAgAEohyA=
Date: Sat, 22 Feb 2014 09:53:26 +0000
Message-ID: <8AE0F17B87264D4CAC7DE0AA6C406F453D844C0A@nkgeml506-mbs.china.huawei.com>
References: <20140214091302.13219.20624.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <m21tz6javn.wl%randy@psg.com> <1442fd6c81e.5859224653900445752.5189762259388794287@internetdraft.org> <52FEBE28.1010006@gmail.com> <8E2A8B56-6F05-4F09-BE7E-651B9CA42458@delong.com> <5300CE32.1050808@gmail.com> <BD473E46-E382-44E6-B474-A56D074318FA@delong.com> <530104B3.3070205@gmail.com> <53010E70.5000401@gmail.com> <20140217110013.GA31822@mushkin> <62FF9B8A-2F21-4FDD-B1D2-82B8C02A21B3@delong.com> <37638184-17C6-4C8B-86B1-C596A5A5504A@nominum.com> <530242C3.4070108@bogus.com> <E91E49CA-7BA6-4DA3-B4F3-46BB0F25F8F1@delong.com> <5303CD3E.1010907@gmail.com> <m2a9dnr4vk.wl%randy@psg.com> <5304BAAF.60608@gmail.com> <53052B43.2070904@gmail.com> <CAKD1Yr2fyZ9FezX5dh=P-PiruiOqKBKO9f5hroD-CHDJS+ZMQQ@mail.gmail.com> <5305FFFD.5090708@foobar.org> <530606FB.9020707@umn.edu> <CAKD1Yr11Zs=zQsVeHyFexRYchsf6DazpGoK6n0NJvMRvpDyd9w@mail.gmail.com> <alpine.DEB.2.02.1402202117450.15054@uplift.swm.pp.se> <96BC705C-266E-43F6-A336-78F2E0DFAFC2@delong.com>
In-Reply-To: <96BC705C-266E-43F6-A336-78F2E0DFAFC2@delong.com>
Accept-Language: en-US, zh-CN
Content-Language: zh-CN
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.111.98.132]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/8KkaEEd6UI3Hsat0kZsGqRfpw6E
Cc: "v6ops@ietf.org WG" <v6ops@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] I-D Action: draft-ietf-v6ops-ula-usage-recommendations-02.txt
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 22 Feb 2014 09:53:38 -0000

Hi Owen,

> I'm all for documenting reality. I'm not for advocating solutions that are
> unproven or discussing poor choices in a bizarrely positive light which is,
> IMHO, the current state of this draft.

[Bing] There are several recommended use cases in the draft:
1. used in isolated networks
2. used along with GUA
3. some specific cases (as private routing prefixes, as up-layer identifiers, as NAT64 prefixes)

Would you mind providing more information about "bizarrely positive light"? Do you mean the above recommended use cases, or some other things?

Thanks,
Bing

> Owen
> 
> _______________________________________________
> v6ops mailing list
> v6ops@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email