IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] Discussion focus: draft-ietf-v6ops-ipv6rtr-reqs

Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@google.com> Fri, 02 February 2018 15:44 UTC

Return-Path: <lorenzo@google.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D868612D961 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 2 Feb 2018 07:44:46 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.71
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.71 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=google.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ewqGyxHgpYXA for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 2 Feb 2018 07:44:45 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-it0-x22d.google.com (mail-it0-x22d.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c0b::22d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3D5C3129511 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Fri, 2 Feb 2018 07:44:45 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-it0-x22d.google.com with SMTP id p139so9020592itb.1 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Fri, 02 Feb 2018 07:44:45 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=di+656bFKhWoUccRSva83nVTebM4SiZ0C8UzzTbxYU8=; b=sP8izdEs/cADa3u0JrYJpywaWsgab1FgxbeZL1uFnlOSQlJY3+//GSDO4B/M169/IP XXEiP7RrdeHDbzbhVlsvb6XgCFjrFYHwrejeX0+CPpJvXMbgxBfGfznJZpdENBFb9t9p qr1UsLNrtdVu10xA+eVmo6jiPwDGpR+bF2bVij6fUgtvaJAf5Ti+LewghxE/YDYPrN81 Xpu2760IflPeCVhv1rCu1HvdRcSuDZj0a8qjRayxli9DO7NJH0k8qyjikk/rvfI9Hxf0 RxqQReJptNCnTW7WbyDyKebNqUhA8Ex0CLuR5i6EuQQ+EVbR478xxeAO95zWeUpHF6Hh k1og==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=di+656bFKhWoUccRSva83nVTebM4SiZ0C8UzzTbxYU8=; b=uKmTJ+hqx0q+/TXuA8d71f0Hs+OOmquUmVg+ma4bGgN5ZR7W56gftyp8Pufnmc6/E4 ERVaKdLWa3OC/lIb8LJZlPU83xXiabjEvGaUhDCUJ3wHy24iTzfC3kprX8mgmldHlbrs PpNX4VAktKJocFa5GlnBgiOP53pCh/A6gZM5NW4E9poCfKoCWZNQ7JdQRPvotye6aEIG 1295O0RuJRUz8W5IKE89eq06t7VouB2lZsfQ6D7mHNCoZbSMljaI8OPqe8cKYEGtGu21 F8tcFmIaELT7Veofe075ptGWLA0NZDAgphS/eELjtaQ4Cpb2CL4t9HuLxAPW9OGx/HIU 2yoA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AKwxytdSij8N9R9no5d0JktV7wJ/ig+m6cxQlVk6GzbICTpaRbQhDL12 6dcEoGZHRnD8eI9BlcUeU80ijZP5rSoZeaDyzNOWEQ==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AH8x225ez9BdqYxfFsuw9+9EoD7rKdFPuUtYHCBeLitYiKQqceXfNuUVV3aWOA4wf0K0wABEAqKkP9P1o5jDK41lV2M=
X-Received: by 10.36.93.136 with SMTP id w130mr47515447ita.106.1517586284008; Fri, 02 Feb 2018 07:44:44 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.107.114.16 with HTTP; Fri, 2 Feb 2018 07:44:23 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <008101d39c3c$430331d0$c9099570$@gmail.com>
References: <B7CB2B98-F069-425D-A096-AADA0297B34C@gmail.com> <CAKD1Yr0r=OZKWHatcaV5ZfXUcJhTrzGqnd6wno7SLur9cJzF5w@mail.gmail.com> <066901d385ab$64d663b0$2e832b10$@gmail.com> <CAKD1Yr2GjXKM53rJJwRzX7RyrCG8u+KZ0TTGuFv=NefHsKRxrw@mail.gmail.com> <bb950d32-8d8a-420b-f01a-609f941109af@gmail.com> <CAKD1Yr10o6aqFQ9QWvJdv82gCh7fXzFEcDjZV2beaO_ebLZAig@mail.gmail.com> <058c01d39188$cb3f7630$61be6290$@gmail.com> <c09653f7-6b5b-5fce-a81e-298a38bd747b@gmail.com> <008101d39c3c$430331d0$c9099570$@gmail.com>
From: Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@google.com>
Date: Sat, 03 Feb 2018 00:44:23 +0900
Message-ID: <CAKD1Yr3sSPYm2tm+M8KGcP+Ra20MpZa6D+Ooh2hLf8c7yzzBPA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Russ White <7riw77@gmail.com>
Cc: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>, "v6ops@ietf.org WG" <v6ops@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a1144ad5c60918505643c976b"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/8NzC8fbV2LxcRA58zUDPVj74bMU>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] Discussion focus: draft-ietf-v6ops-ipv6rtr-reqs
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 02 Feb 2018 15:44:47 -0000

On Sat, Feb 3, 2018 at 12:41 AM, <7riw77@gmail.com> wrote:

> I can't think of any scoping text that cannot have holes punched in it,
> and hence won't end up being a separate document itself. If folks could
> provide scoping that will hold up against various objections and corner
> cases, whether for the entire document or individual requirements, I'd be
> happy to include it.
>

But if we do not include scoping text, this document might not achieve
consensus, in which case none of the text would get published at all.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email