Re: [v6ops] draft-moreiras-v6ops-rfc3849bis-00

Owen DeLong <owen@delong.com> Mon, 12 August 2013 17:15 UTC

Return-Path: <owen@delong.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 34FC721F9298 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 12 Aug 2013 10:15:57 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.45
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.45 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.150, BAYES_00=-2.599, NO_RELAYS=-0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xujwMq4c1fww for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 12 Aug 2013 10:15:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from owen.delong.com (owen.delong.com [IPv6:2620:0:930::200:2]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D8CC421E8054 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Mon, 12 Aug 2013 10:01:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [IPv6:2620::930:0:ca2a:14ff:fe3e:d024] ([IPv6:2620:0:930:0:ca2a:14ff:fe3e:d024]) (authenticated bits=0) by owen.delong.com (8.14.2/8.14.1) with ESMTP id r7CGsa6C012141 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT); Mon, 12 Aug 2013 09:55:34 -0700
X-DKIM: Sendmail DKIM Filter v2.8.3 owen.delong.com r7CGsa6C012141
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=simple/simple; d=delong.com; s=mail; t=1376326535; bh=sE88zefdWP/sHdxWxOFo6TrKKqs=; h=Content-Type:Mime-Version:Subject:From:In-Reply-To:Date:Cc: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Message-Id:References:To; b=idBn4Ry+McO2GKLuyQrRuUU6dN/W5OB8m6VqsVjl8FI5rZaHilYZqiK93RWD72Jzv JS/xE9cYfKBt84c4TwdiX6h7/dpcufX0cmRQTcxw8qRBJPWRfnpPfPGSsa3MDY4JQ2 cwAG6ug5bKxH3ppNiMBgMjiM3b+g/FKxGR+qDBmo=
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.5 \(1508\))
From: Owen DeLong <owen@delong.com>
In-Reply-To: <52082128.5090503@nic.br>
Date: Mon, 12 Aug 2013 09:55:36 -0700
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <C7478DBE-5F73-442B-B773-D1B2CF7E0935@delong.com>
References: <5207D42F.2030302@nic.br> <5207E319.6070601@nic.br> <B66D2D0C-DE6D-49CC-A87A-7C65B5360DB4@delong.com> <52082128.5090503@nic.br>
To: "Antonio M. Moreiras" <moreiras@nic.br>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1508)
X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.0rc1 (owen.delong.com [IPv6:2620:0:930::200:2]); Mon, 12 Aug 2013 09:55:35 -0700 (PDT)
Cc: Alejandro Acosta <aacosta@rocketmail.com>, v6ops@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [v6ops] draft-moreiras-v6ops-rfc3849bis-00
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/v6ops>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Aug 2013 17:15:57 -0000

On Aug 11, 2013, at 16:41 , Antonio M. Moreiras <moreiras@nic.br> wrote:

> On 11/08/13 19:29, Owen DeLong wrote:
>> I support the idea. It might be worth also asking for a ULA Doc slice at the same time.
>> I think a /48 is probably sufficient for most ULA examples.
>> 
>> But I think it would be good to be able to write up ULA examples and training that use
>> actual ULA prefixes intended for documentation.
> 
> I agree. An organization could generate an ULA prefix specifically to
> use in a course, or document. But it could be copied and used in
> production environments. This would break the "global uniqueness", and
> could lead to other problems. It would be nice to have a specific ULA
> documentation prefix.
> 
> I would suggest a prefix with the L bit cleared, easy to remember, and
> maybe slightly shorter than /48. For example FC00:0:D0C0::/44.
> 
> []s
> Moreiras.

That would certainly be an acceptable solution as far as I am concerned.

Owen