Subject: Re: [v6ops] 464xlat case study (was reclassify 464XLAT as standard instead of info)
From: james woodyatt <[email-masked]>
To: "Heatley,N,Nick,TQB R" <[email-masked]>
Cc: IPv6 Ops WG <[email-masked]>
Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2017 15:22:23 -0700
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>

On Sep 27, 2017, at 13:51, Heatley,N,Nick,TQB R <[email-masked]> wrote:
> 
> certain vpn clients, still in service, fail

- If those apps are still in service, then they can be updated.
- If they can be updated for security, then they can be updated for IPv6-only operation without 464XLAT.
- If they won’t be updated, then keeping them in service is a security problem.

--james woodyatt <[email-masked] <mailto:[email-masked]>>