Re: [v6ops] draft-ietf-v6ops-mobile-device-profile last call

Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@google.com> Wed, 11 February 2015 09:44 UTC

Return-Path: <lorenzo@google.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B86581A87A0 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 11 Feb 2015 01:44:18 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.088
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.088 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ApepwEXp6Qn7 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 11 Feb 2015 01:44:17 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ie0-f178.google.com (mail-ie0-f178.google.com [209.85.223.178]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D2E6F1A8798 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Wed, 11 Feb 2015 01:44:16 -0800 (PST)
Received: by iery20 with SMTP id y20so2712685ier.1 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Wed, 11 Feb 2015 01:44:16 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=H08rC6GF2igvmY6FioFWmU7kxBSnvdXdXP7iixzTsXs=; b=RIZEt08PWZ6I2xcivSCZqRisjpKpkRZ7wkixLfIleofJHjdXoVUUtzCqobX8OQagU1 DXEdoJM49jRnnJzXzVe4uI/fwB5RvMN300GIapzUwS/qKsNzAnLTxEPNV7UywmU36f1R nH5S3H3oyFd9NeKZIkTbRdMqJs1HA58xVr5wg2Kom4wM+BW2nw0rCt36pdKjKoW9SGCy lYQfWG1FiQtp++bO3+V80BKkQamJuSq4qI2xSjPF4ZSAmRl9eRxhaC5Z9iGujYWUyMij gDXVgIzvDtdCr0kC5CD1nNgRUHMgIV55hgR4WztwBC9aQz3jmVGC2hcXKbvuWwaxv/6F 7/mA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=H08rC6GF2igvmY6FioFWmU7kxBSnvdXdXP7iixzTsXs=; b=EWjoF3J9d7g5SttXbQBQaABdaxWC16MmhKYyXfeCh1rjj8v7NUtoiIPEcQrmAN3Yc0 QjR5Zh7raZQlNbxdDzhlXPgiYwhmzP160nBQQ4HWjRR+zFZdMQgoys0lqpVvsJhoLaOp 3Ekini6I9oRTXMO6A6mWuUW0P3aRcPdKELAJiF2xdlpxJjR3PtQY2MRBG+5wljyic0Ha VJfyk4AA7549bjc1QCM0+y7kk+BDPdvHFd70eqHrtxLXxY86yhD1SKyyWZmPdCrWTLdj aCWiVWQOWXvwlEcvJLTgGigqP/ya2xwgpXUUlNBP0ZFywT7G1BK1YBxO4VNZHr0WkO4q gZZA==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmkFl24uiJhK/o4LOCPxyJOfuJAUtqPKthCnZELx/ISwSSQ/T92W8jsI7Ks+sZAp7uaSaqU
X-Received: by 10.107.136.24 with SMTP id k24mr22398530iod.59.1423647856284; Wed, 11 Feb 2015 01:44:16 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.64.33.104 with HTTP; Wed, 11 Feb 2015 01:43:56 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <787AE7BB302AE849A7480A190F8B933004908F65@OPEXCLILM23.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup>
References: <8B808F0C-1AA8-4ABE-A06E-80652B9C1498@cisco.com> <B7D61F30-BAC4-4BE0-A5FD-1D4BD4652E55@employees.org> <20150129201251.GD34798@Space.Net> <787AE7BB302AE849A7480A190F8B933004902668@OPEXCLILM23.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup> <20150130103924.GG34798@Space.Net> <787AE7BB302AE849A7480A190F8B933004902889@OPEXCLILM23.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup> <BF1BDC61-D8BD-4FB3-A111-070D9FF51F60@cisco.com> <6536E263028723489CCD5B6821D4B21303DE865D@UK30S005EXS06.EEAD.EEINT.CO.UK> <787AE7BB302AE849A7480A190F8B933004908DF9@OPEXCLILM23.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup> <CAKD1Yr1CPecjtSM6iUjgy+0hYJGKbwsiSXL-Rs3EreWXg8bAew@mail.gmail.com> <787AE7BB302AE849A7480A190F8B933004908E6C@OPEXCLILM23.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup> <CAKD1Yr2D3S3uGYczBmjZ2v06BXYUZRZ-zPbuueouCjTUbwehPA@mail.gmail.com> <787AE7BB302AE849A7480A190F8B933004908F65@OPEXCLILM23.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup>
From: Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@google.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2015 01:43:56 -0800
Message-ID: <CAKD1Yr37-VuiCMDigTxj-dg2J3ne685Qsbg39vM6ad2B=tnYSg@mail.gmail.com>
To: "<mohamed.boucadair@orange.com>" <mohamed.boucadair@orange.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a113ed15ac27bd8050eccd814
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/8bnYFIDf9LboiJFgJilR9bzahEM>
Cc: "draft-ietf-v6ops-mobile-device-profile.all@tools.ietf.org" <draft-ietf-v6ops-mobile-device-profile.all@tools.ietf.org>, V6 Ops List <v6ops@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] draft-ietf-v6ops-mobile-device-profile last call
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2015 09:44:18 -0000

On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 12:51 AM, <mohamed.boucadair@orange.com> wrote:
>
> The document was adopted by the WG and passed both the WG and IETF LCs
> with that scope. I naively assumed that this point is not anymore an issue
> given that the draft passed major milestones (several WGLCs, IETF LC) and
> the IETF consensus declared for it means this is not an issue to advance
> the document.
>
I think that assumption is incorrect, given Fred's explicit statement on
this thread, "Before I bother the IESG with it a third time, I’d really
like to hear a clear consensus, not a rough one."

https://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/v6ops/current/msg21229.html