IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] I-D Action: draft-ietf-6man-grand-01 - additional security concerns

Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com> Fri, 31 July 2020 15:43 UTC

Return-Path: <mellon@fugue.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE4733A0A96 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 31 Jul 2020 08:43:51 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.898
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.898 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=fugue-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ke9-mqp2_hGB for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 31 Jul 2020 08:43:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qk1-x72e.google.com (mail-qk1-x72e.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::72e]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2A2773A0A92 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Fri, 31 Jul 2020 08:43:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qk1-x72e.google.com with SMTP id e13so29151324qkg.5 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Fri, 31 Jul 2020 08:43:48 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=fugue-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date:in-reply-to:cc:to :references; bh=R3JTTuqhSsjNRvWvRoZIW94PZN1FRygOZr+ygTth6HY=; b=oIiLQ/SyYi2WbeJp5TrQyKFjnr8q4uItTlx/bsxxu9RIjzvz7vTZ3QnVwKvL8LPQDr WySb09jXt6Lcf1uuFR9iWiIAaI/debkebxfsDej6msP7fcblQMlyXIGcAl0UN8FDFyfe 0hqZBcokkjomsF0ju7+ca4cgG8+aKBD27bVebOL/X4kICiyUI76UR/YSGzbfpV60Q0ee UXq38ndtPo40A9tJtTyXpk9UvNmQk1PYo7QHwU9KgUuU6+IfrHvEvhHy3E87tWvZg/gv YZKkoriBtNvybTDMBSpjI7ru84aFi5RGMtW8NUzs5q5/ErwjuGPPNq/fCRmBA1/jFcku ULjg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date :in-reply-to:cc:to:references; bh=R3JTTuqhSsjNRvWvRoZIW94PZN1FRygOZr+ygTth6HY=; b=P0U6FYhtH7zF3KEBa+fnTQ5dm1nqGYUx1w/+uYNj3rqHUNgyBOamBZYLeZqe01Szs1 YxLsJh0ULhx0fde914stO0SxrIUjfpWuQRfZtr7cE94C1/l0z1evgrKAqCGjrsEzO1ON vPquLQYcOS9a1DHxagwANmkbc9jDJsVQctIU51z8/XONxk1bKGRCfBz5/PQX7iFUUh8a n605Q9dJbHqoaoMPjO67hN/yPwkHrJKhC67QRKMCdk0Bl3+9IjdVQepNdIVwh0Is3Th1 2Wiiv6EU1BpHSZoFnqObexZsgugNNJ93UU/NNo6nHs1b+ah9fGBQqtjagNwou+kvrD2h CiBA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532AGu3RvZcqTL8E0aojxRXBx6/8RY3UuDhElzkKkUfTh3z4A1XQ gPWp47M1bV0pcgIng//BlzU9/WuGa/U=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyFxX4322zAukZMCDX5wJ2aP/zJxHqgQfMsSztjHO6nvAnFaqGCLb6Uxa6SHmivTfUWnKDSvA==
X-Received: by 2002:a05:620a:1653:: with SMTP id c19mr4701836qko.501.1596210227220; Fri, 31 Jul 2020 08:43:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ?IPv6:2601:18b:300:36ee:1d5e:d83c:760:89f9? ([2601:18b:300:36ee:1d5e:d83c:760:89f9]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 71sm8571539qkk.125.2020.07.31.08.43.46 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 31 Jul 2020 08:43:46 -0700 (PDT)
From: Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com>
Message-Id: <94D12FD5-3A0A-4278-A229-F0D88EC906D6@fugue.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_C56CFD96-5308-45A1-AE94-1270A1AED052"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.4 \(3608.120.23.2.1\))
Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2020 11:43:45 -0400
In-Reply-To: <F56A89D4-0DA3-4A9B-ADC1-FC51ECAB193B@delong.com>
Cc: "Pascal Thubert (pthubert)" <pthubert=40cisco.com@dmarc.ietf.org>, v6ops list <v6ops@ietf.org>, 6man <ipv6@ietf.org>
To: Owen DeLong <owen@delong.com>
References: <96fa6d80137241dd9b57fcd871c8a897@huawei.com> <CAFU7BARePzdeU5DFgoOWyrF0xZCj67_xkC2t8vMN2nH0d8aUig@mail.gmail.com> <37e2a7110f6b423eba0303811913f533@huawei.com> <CAFU7BATiD8RkiWXjrxGuAJU-BUwRQCErYZivUPZ-Mc_up_qGxQ@mail.gmail.com> <aebc46c9b813477b9ae0db0ef33e7bd9@huawei.com> <CAO42Z2yL7+GbO6QRaNzFYoBXLF-JZ2NfwgTTt2zerKhJLwt2Lw@mail.gmail.com> <3C1ECB6F-E667-4200-964F-AB233A0A56E9@cisco.com> <91D98D51-4045-4331-A711-8387ECE73400@fugue.com> <F56A89D4-0DA3-4A9B-ADC1-FC51ECAB193B@delong.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.120.23.2.1)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/8qNTVA9fWOLhVBU1_xClhWSuM_s>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] I-D Action: draft-ietf-6man-grand-01 - additional security concerns
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2020 15:43:52 -0000

On Jul 31, 2020, at 11:30 AM, Owen DeLong <owen@delong.com> wrote:
> 1.	Public wifi networks (e.g. coffee houses, etc.)

The BCP for this case is to isolate clients.

> 2.	College/University settings (some v6 traction here, but often not on student-device accessible LANs)

For this it would be to give each dorm room its own subnet.

> 3.	Other networks which must admit untrusted clients/devices

E.g. home networks? Or something else?

v2.3.2 | Report a Bug | By Email