Re: [v6ops] IETF 101 Agenda development

[Fred Baker <[e-mail]>]

We are, as usual, looking for working group feedback on the list. Folks, please comment.

> On Feb 26, 2018, at 7:22 AM, Van De Velde, Gunter (Nokia - BE/Antwerp) <[e-mail]> wrote:
> 
> Hi Fred, Chairs,
> 
> We would like to ask a slot to discuss new draft ' draft-fioccola-v6ops-ipv6-alt-mark' regarding passive flow measurements in native IPv6 networks using IPv6 tunnel structures (i.e. SRv6). The presenter for the slot will be Guiseppe Fioccola.
> 
> Name:		draft-fioccola-v6ops-ipv6-alt-mark
> Revision:	00
> Title:		IPv6 Performance Measurement with Alternate Marking Method
> URL:            https://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-fioccola-v6ops-ipv6-alt-mark-00.txt
> 
> Abstract:
>   This document describes how the alternate marking method can be used
>   as the passive performance measurement method in an IPv6 domain, and
>   will discuss the strengths and the weaknesses of the implementation
>   options available to network operations.
> 
> G/
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: v6ops [mailto:[e-mail]] On Behalf Of Fred Baker
> Sent: Tuesday, February 20, 2018 19:57
> To: V6 Ops List <[e-mail]>
> Subject: [v6ops] IETF 101 Agenda development
> 
> The chairs are pulling together the agenda for IETF 101.
> 
> We have a proposed talk from Mythic Beasts, which is a data center operation that is focused on IPv6-only operation using Raspberry Pi platforms (they have IPv4 for customers, but charge for addresses, where IPv6 addresses are free, and they find customers willing to go IPv6-only when money comes into the discussion), and two working group drafts. Fred Templin has been suggesting draft-templin-v6ops-pdhost as a working group draft, but we see little responding discussion, and infer that the working group doesn't find enough of value in the draft to support it.
> 
> If you have a document to update (Jen and Russ, that's you) or a new document to post for discussion, now would be the time to do it. The draft cut-off is Monday 2018-03-05, two weeks hence, and the chairs will be looking for email traffic on drafts posted to see whether there is working group interest.
> 
> WG: Unupdated WG Document
> 	2017-10-09	draft-ietf-v6ops-conditional-ras
> 
> WG: Updated WG Document
> 	2018-01-02	draft-ietf-v6ops-ipv6rtr-reqs
> 
> Individual Submission: Unupdated
> 	2017-10-30	draft-palet-v6ops-ipv6-only
> 	2017-10-30	draft-shytyi-v6ops-danir
> 	2017-10-29	draft-palet-v6ops-he-reporting
> 	2017-10-29	draft-palet-v6ops-p2p-from-customer-prefix
> 	2017-10-17	draft-palet-v6ops-rfc7084-bis-transition
> 	2017-10-17	draft-xli-v6ops-cernet-deployment
> 	2017-10-09	draft-palet-v6ops-464xlat-deployment
> 	2017-08-28	draft-xu-v6ops-dslite-redundancy
> 
> Individual Submission: Updated
> 	2017-12-19	draft-templin-v6ops-pdhost
>