[v6ops] Benjamin Kaduk's No Record on draft-ietf-v6ops-nat64-deployment-07: (with COMMENT)

[Benjamin Kaduk via Datatracker <[e-mail]>]

Benjamin Kaduk has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-v6ops-nat64-deployment-07: No Record

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-v6ops-nat64-deployment/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Staying at No Record since I'm balloting late, but:

Just asking "DNSSEC: Are there hosts validating DNSSEC?" may not be the
best way to plan for the future, as it ignores the question of whether
hosts may in the future start or want to start validating DNSSEC.
It would be unfortunate if deploying a NAT64 solution hindered DNSSEC
deployment as a side effect.