Re: [v6ops] Incremental Deployment of IPv6-only Wi-Fi for IETF Meetings

"Brzozowski, John" <John_Brzozowski@comcast.com> Mon, 17 July 2017 12:29 UTC

Return-Path: <John_Brzozowski@comcast.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F85F131668 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 17 Jul 2017 05:29:49 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id AA3uZOgww-d5 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 17 Jul 2017 05:29:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from vaadcmhout01.cable.comcast.com (vaadcmhout01.cable.comcast.com [96.114.28.75]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B2BC613188D for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Mon, 17 Jul 2017 05:29:46 -0700 (PDT)
X-AuditID: 60721c4b-733ff70000000a8e-c0-596cadb8bfac
Received: from VAADCEX12.cable.comcast.com (vaadcmhoutvip.cable.comcast.com [96.115.73.56]) (using TLS with cipher AES256-SHA256 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by vaadcmhout01.cable.comcast.com (SMTP Gateway) with SMTP id 0D.03.02702.8BDAC695; Mon, 17 Jul 2017 08:29:44 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from VAADCEX09.cable.comcast.com (147.191.102.76) by VAADCEX12.cable.comcast.com (147.191.102.79) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1293.2; Mon, 17 Jul 2017 08:29:43 -0400
Received: from VAADCEX09.cable.comcast.com ([fe80::3aea:a7ff:fe12:e2a0]) by VAADCEX09.cable.comcast.com ([fe80::3aea:a7ff:fe12:e2a0%19]) with mapi id 15.00.1293.002; Mon, 17 Jul 2017 08:29:43 -0400
From: "Brzozowski, John" <John_Brzozowski@comcast.com>
To: Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com>, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ <jordi.palet@consulintel.es>
CC: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>, IPv6 Ops WG <v6ops@ietf.org>, Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>, Alissa Cooper <alissa@cooperw.in>, Jim Martin <jim@daedelus.com>, Suresh Krishnan <suresh.krishnan@gmail.com>
Thread-Topic: [v6ops] Incremental Deployment of IPv6-only Wi-Fi for IETF Meetings
Thread-Index: AQHS/tSiyacM1/hfIEykN3ouQq0Z36JX77qAgAADloCAAGB1gA==
Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2017 12:29:43 +0000
Message-ID: <BEB73854-CBB3-42DB-99DA-1F508D7736C2@cable.comcast.com>
References: <7643C1DC-76A3-4652-9BB1-D0D42801F37E@consulintel.es> <CAEqgTWYOe=jWp=zVZNLx6DjKjNpPTYaq2jmjryudrGZHKZNq6g@mail.gmail.com> <A5D0385C-F755-4B44-86D8-6E618E77193F@consulintel.es> <CAPt1N1kroh2cPkTr8HRfNjLTdG0hkC1oQsUZdhQzQA5tA9-xug@mail.gmail.com> <9AF791E9-1E12-425E-93A4-2913E2D18CBA@consulintel.es> <CAPt1N1kU4cpVCsp7W3XNAZupYqjTWVH+BNp9bwtznnWD_uP2oQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAEqgTWZzZW0wKggDXjY=-aMfDxzd5-GoRqju1829XwY3aHQuYg@mail.gmail.com> <0FAF1E05-DA4B-47BF-95F7-7EFCD1BED9B0@cable.comcast.com> <42188852-BBEB-4D75-967F-4BED79BBBCAE@consulintel.es> <CAPt1N1nnYd-8J9B90E8xkPEZEUvfupvgOySAB3yHtW7fMFM6iA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAPt1N1nnYd-8J9B90E8xkPEZEUvfupvgOySAB3yHtW7fMFM6iA@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/f.21.0.170409
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [96.115.73.254]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_BEB73854CBB342DB99DA1F508D7736C2cablecomcastcom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Forward
X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA11UfVAUZRzu3ftaTt5aF7h7OcHkZiRqFGEiW5OpxqzOikFtIs9/YDm2u5P7 YG7v+GiymCYysZmYBsc4oRo6a5QPg2yAplLPGxP8uABHx/hwrBuVKw1DY8DRad/dPVz6591n n+f3/p7f++w7S6romN5EOj1+zudhXWatXl3Gb2JW93e5rHnxqQJm35l7gIlfv6RjLkRUzL1f ZlTMX50RgrnaMEUwkW/PapjTJ39SPU9auo9uttyOTRGWxlujhOX9X7/WWQaCEzpLKDRHWPa2 7AeWQ+O3NZvJ7frCCs7lrOZ8a54t0zviHQe1Vd2/g9rQB1FtPegZB40giURUAYrev0JgTFN9 BOrY/VQj0Av4GEAjkQ619DIIUO+dO1pcpaXWoiPHx3QYp1JvoO7JERGrqPMADU+8iXEKtRXN nhnWSDWvo74PZ+T6DejP9gEVxmpqJbo8f0PgSRJSG9Gtpk2S1y4Nmtw7JNYkUVtQc/S06Aso A5od6iQkLyP6LfYFIZ2AQqEfoyoJp6GpP+6LvmlULrowfVAt8avQ2Ysx+cR56PsDP8t8Fpr/ /LxW6mlHwz0zYg2klqLBlphcY0QnIv2aJpAeVFgHFVuCii1B4Tgq6nF0+Ic1UkkWat5zRSfh HNTQ2ibjZ1C0aRQoa74E5CGwvJplK2xuhzfgz8vPtbHlLi7X5nXbWN6Pn70AXxxfxqv9oHvu 5TCgSGBOhidaXVZaw1bzde4wqCQJcxoc1lZa6YfLvRV1DpZ3lPoCLo43p8KMPUIlXKDLA65K swl+1CmwKQush6vhXZxfuKnm5bAdNzIuaHyAr3LanN4AXxrwucIAkSqhbVYXblvB1r3N+byS WRgsI9VmI8we2GGlKTvr5yo5rorzJdQakjQjuBY7L/Vxdq72LafLn5CFfY0tgkIpFXHYTMhE nFbaoBQU82bB9Vg2KeX/j0yQSWFgJ5OFuZ8T5+arWDfvtMvWKXA3Dik5wYq26XBVh0DSCVJh mQlLdEJEhoS02G4ItAEy+NncvwTZK65H7p6aJciwuJ7EK632eD2cyQjfwQ4UbuMIeBaiMBng 4JYyK/2IQsAjmTLgx5hPU/APpjKtgNexmq5QFw+W+APFgU24QylwBf4SycL/6UESNGQxuUQm xSAQ3CZ+MplT5JABrTiHNFlZ7BYXAieEwFOKxMD9rF8Z+HiRGLjMyoGPFImBy+SiwPdhyZCQ FjuZ6sHOJV7fuWjftVMH1j1pfCx1f3HDP+7CMf1DxHRhydPjbfZrk7VbPZQlcnX1vG4M5rSt q8m/+80rjncD2cnOle99Yr852n6x64VdN/4OlZ4rfO3F2KPB7ZbaSfDV8eLCS9PrP9244+h3 OfSyl3qaN2S7R4pv0pqSY4e38dwwc7l+oqA1c6dZzTvY/CdUPp79D/KU9ar3BQAA
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/9I4rZvQo9DEVnfAv2i2csm8TQMg>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] Incremental Deployment of IPv6-only Wi-Fi for IETF Meetings
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2017 12:29:49 -0000

Agreed.

John
+1-484-962-0060

From: v6ops <v6ops-bounces@ietf.org> on behalf of Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com>
Date: Monday, July 17, 2017 at 10:30
To: JORDI MARTINEZ <jordi.palet@consulintel.es>
Cc: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>, v6ops <v6ops@ietf.org>, Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>, Alissa Cooper <alissa@cooperw.in>, Jim Martin <jim@daedelus.com>, Suresh Krishnan <suresh.krishnan@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] Incremental Deployment of IPv6-only Wi-Fi for IETF Meetings

Have you ever actually used the ietf-nat64 network?   What problems did you have?   I ask because I use it at every IETF, and I never have any problems.   So the degree of fear that you are exhibiting about having it be the default is really surprising to me.   This is really not a big deal, except in the sense that it's a big deal that the IETF still isn't dogfooding at meetings twenty years later.

On Mon, Jul 17, 2017 at 10:17 AM, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ <jordi.palet@consulintel.es<mailto:jordi.palet@consulintel.es>> wrote:
However, we have different ways for doing the same, and we should go for the one that has less impact and it is more realistic.

In the real world, you will not disable IPv4 in the LANs of end-users or enterprise customers (at least not now, may be in 3-5 years from now). This is what IETF need to test now. IPv6 only with IPv4 as a service (which is 464XLAT).

Again, and I’m for-IPv6, but being realistic, not considering sci-fi of turning down IPv4 in our customer networks (now).

Regards,
Jordi


-----Mensaje original-----
De: v6ops <v6ops-bounces@ietf.org<mailto:v6ops-bounces@ietf.org>> en nombre de "Brzozowski, John" <John_Brzozowski@comcast.com<mailto:John_Brzozowski@comcast.com>>
Responder a: <John_Brzozowski@comcast.com<mailto:John_Brzozowski@comcast.com>>
Fecha: lunes, 17 de julio de 2017, 10:14
Para: Noah <noah@neo.co.tz<mailto:noah@neo.co.tz>>, Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com<mailto:mellon@fugue.com>>
CC: Jim Martin <jim@daedelus.com<mailto:jim@daedelus.com>>, IPv6 Ops WG <v6ops@ietf.org<mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>>, Alissa Cooper <alissa@cooperw.in<mailto:alissa@cooperw.in>>, Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com<mailto:housley@vigilsec.com>>, Randy Bush <randy@psg.com<mailto:randy@psg.com>>, Suresh Krishnan <suresh.krishnan@gmail.com<mailto:suresh.krishnan@gmail.com>>
Asunto: Re: [v6ops] Incremental Deployment of IPv6-only Wi-Fi for IETF Meetings

    Agree with Noah and Ted.

    Note the I-D explicitly documents that a fallback, dual stack SSID must remain available as Noah mentions below.

    I fail to see how doing this will harm or discriminate.

    We do need to eat our own dogfood, otherwise we are hypocrites.

    John

    +1-484-962-0060<tel:%2B1-484-962-0060>

    From:
    v6ops <v6ops-bounces@ietf.org<mailto:v6ops-bounces@ietf.org>> on behalf of Noah <noah@neo.co.tz<mailto:noah@neo.co.tz>>
    Date: Monday, July 17, 2017 at 09:01
    To: Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com<mailto:mellon@fugue.com>>
    Cc: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com<mailto:randy@psg.com>>, v6ops <v6ops@ietf.org<mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>>, Alissa Cooper <alissa@cooperw.in<mailto:alissa@cooperw.in>>, Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com<mailto:housley@vigilsec.com>>, Jim Martin <jim@daedelus.com<mailto:jim@daedelus.com>>, Suresh Krishnan <suresh.krishnan@gmail.com<mailto:suresh.krishnan@gmail.com>>
    Subject: Re: [v6ops] Incremental Deployment of IPv6-only Wi-Fi for IETF Meetings



    FWIW and to cater for all, would a fallback dual stack SSID work for the status quo while this 2nd v6 SSID is also experimented upon which is a great idea considering this is IETF.



    Noah



    On 17 Jul 2017 9:54 a.m., "Ted Lemon" <mellon@fugue.com<mailto:mellon@fugue.com>> wrote:

    I don't think this is a social justice issue.   Does the IETF think that IPv6 works, or not?   If we think it works, and we have been working for what, 20 years, to make it work, and we have designed all this great
     transition tech, then why on earth would we not want to use it?   This isn't "one draft."   This is roughly half the work of the IETF for the past two decades.


    On Mon, Jul 17, 2017 at 8:51 AM, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ <jordi.palet@consulintel.es<mailto:jordi.palet@consulintel.es>> wrote:

    So we agree to change the rules so that we use this network for every ID that want to experiment with it? Otherwise we discriminate among different authors …

    I think is a really bad precedent.

    Regards,
    Jordi


    -----Mensaje original-----
    De: Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com<mailto:mellon@fugue.com>>
    Responder a: <mellon@fugue.com<mailto:mellon@fugue.com>>
    Fecha: lunes, 17 de julio de 2017, 8:48
    Para: JORDI PALET MARTINEZ <jordi.palet@consulintel.es<mailto:jordi.palet@consulintel.es>>
    CC: IPv6 Ops WG <v6ops@ietf.org<mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>>, Jim Martin <jim@daedelus.com<mailto:jim@daedelus.com>>, Randy Bush <randy@psg.com<mailto:randy@psg.com>>, Suresh
     Krishnan <suresh.krishnan@gmail.com<mailto:suresh.krishnan@gmail.com>>, Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com<mailto:housley@vigilsec.com>>, Alissa Cooper <alissa@cooperw.in<mailto:alissa@cooperw.in>>
    Asunto: Re: [v6ops] Incremental Deployment of IPv6-only Wi-Fi for IETF Meetings

        I don't actually know what the goal of the IETF network is other than to provide connectivity.   Because of the vicissitudes of hotel topology, it is often the case that IETF participants experience issues with the
     network at least once or twice per IETF despite the best efforts (and they are quite exceptional) of the NOC team.   I do not really see what the damage is that you are hoping to protect against here.   Users who don't read the NOC announcement?   No sympathy.
      Sorry.





    **********************************************
    IPv4 is over
    Are you ready for the new Internet ?
    http://www.consulintel.es
    The IPv6 Company

    This electronic message contains information which may be privileged or confidential. The information is intended to be for the use of the individual(s) named above. If you are not the intended recipient be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or
     use of the contents of this information, including attached files, is prohibited.



    _______________________________________________
    v6ops mailing list
    v6ops@ietf.org<mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
    https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops








    _______________________________________________
    v6ops mailing list
    v6ops@ietf.org<mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
    https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops







    _______________________________________________
    v6ops mailing list
    v6ops@ietf.org<mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
    https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops




**********************************************
IPv4 is over
Are you ready for the new Internet ?
http://www.consulintel.es
The IPv6 Company

This electronic message contains information which may be privileged or confidential. The information is intended to be for the use of the individual(s) named above. If you are not the intended recipient be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, including attached files, is prohibited.



_______________________________________________
v6ops mailing list
v6ops@ietf.org<mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops