Re: [v6ops] new draft: draft-ietf-v6ops-6204bis
<mohamed.boucadair@orange.com> Tue, 18 October 2011 15:40 UTC
Return-Path: <mohamed.boucadair@orange.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5757521F844C for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 18 Oct 2011 08:40:41 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.159
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.159 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_05=-1.11, HELO_EQ_FR=0.35, J_CHICKENPOX_13=0.6, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Kh8lt9cM19Je for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 18 Oct 2011 08:40:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from relais-inet.francetelecom.com (relais-ias91.francetelecom.com [193.251.215.91]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 198FC21F8B87 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Tue, 18 Oct 2011 08:40:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from omfedm08.si.francetelecom.fr (unknown [xx.xx.xx.4]) by omfedm14.si.francetelecom.fr (ESMTP service) with ESMTP id CAC0A22CEF7; Tue, 18 Oct 2011 17:40:38 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from PUEXCH11.nanterre.francetelecom.fr (unknown [10.101.44.27]) by omfedm08.si.francetelecom.fr (ESMTP service) with ESMTP id A77D5238154; Tue, 18 Oct 2011 17:40:38 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from PUEXCB1B.nanterre.francetelecom.fr ([10.101.44.7]) by PUEXCH11.nanterre.francetelecom.fr ([10.101.44.27]) with mapi; Tue, 18 Oct 2011 17:40:38 +0200
From: mohamed.boucadair@orange.com
To: Fred Baker <fred@cisco.com>, Maglione Roberta <roberta.maglione@telecomitalia.it>, "draft-ietf-pcp-base@tools.ietf.org" <draft-ietf-pcp-base@tools.ietf.org>, "pcp-chairs@tools.ietf.org" <pcp-chairs@tools.ietf.org>
Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2011 17:40:37 +0200
Thread-Topic: [v6ops] new draft: draft-ietf-v6ops-6204bis
Thread-Index: AcyIu2t8cEmEfoUVRZO+1VXRKDAbdgE8IbWQ
Message-ID: <94C682931C08B048B7A8645303FDC9F35A2DDC07B7@PUEXCB1B.nanterre.francetelecom.fr>
References: <201110111355.p9BDt1M23806@ftpeng-update.cisco.com><282BBE8A501E1F4DA9C775F964BB21FE3EB758B7A8@GRFMBX704BA020.griffon.local> <1B8E4C5A-D08B-4F37-B701-A39745136A33@cisco.com> <750BF7861EBBE048B3E648B4BB6E8F4F1FDCA4C3@crexc50p> <282BBE8A501E1F4DA9C775F964BB21FE3EB758B7AB@GRFMBX704BA020.griffon.local> <B06E5723-1EE5-4808-AE7F-3D98EB3F17CE@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <B06E5723-1EE5-4808-AE7F-3D98EB3F17CE@cisco.com>
Accept-Language: fr-FR
Content-Language: fr-FR
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: fr-FR
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-PMX-Version: 5.5.9.395186, Antispam-Engine: 2.7.2.376379, Antispam-Data: 2011.3.31.105417
Cc: "v6ops@ietf.org" <v6ops@ietf.org>, MEILLAREC Loïc OLNC/NAD/TIP <loic.meillarec@orange.com>, "draft-ietf-v6ops-6204bis@tools.ietf.org" <draft-ietf-v6ops-6204bis@tools.ietf.org>, Ullio Mario <mario.ullio@telecomitalia.it>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] new draft: draft-ietf-v6ops-6204bis
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/v6ops>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2011 15:40:41 -0000
Dear Fred, all, As part of our DS-Lite deployment, PCP is a requirements for us. I strongly support including PCP in 6204bis. Note that PCP is not only about IPv4 service continuity but also about IPv6... Cheers, Med -----Message d'origine----- De : v6ops-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:v6ops-bounces@ietf.org] De la part de Fred Baker Envoyé : mercredi 12 octobre 2011 10:46 À : Maglione Roberta; draft-ietf-pcp-base@tools.ietf.org; pcp-chairs@tools.ietf.org Cc : v6ops@ietf.org; draft-ietf-v6ops-6204bis@tools.ietf.org; Ullio Mario Objet : Re: [v6ops] new draft: draft-ietf-v6ops-6204bis Adding the PCP chairs and the authors of http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-pcp-base; folks, what is your plan for PCP? Roberta, I understand now that you're looking at a WAN-side solution. Again, I'm looking for comment from other operators. But if we add it to this spec, I would like to see PCP in the IESG's hands as we send 6204bis in. I will note that this is about IPv4 life extension, not IPv6 deployment. On Oct 12, 2011, at 4:21 AM, Maglione Roberta wrote: > Hello Fred and Barbara, > When a Carrier Grade NAT is deployed in the Service Provider's network PCP could be seen as the geographic extension of UPnP as it may be used in order to control how incoming packets are forwarded by the upstream device. > > In my opinion PCP is not a topic strictly restricted to the homenet WG, but it may belong to this document as this draft already contains DS-Lite and PCP and DS-Lite could be use together in the Service Provider's network. > > I understand the issue about the normative reference and I really would like to see an RFC number for it soon, as we are one the operator that expressed some urgency for that for the reasons you mentioned. > > Regards, > Roberta > > > -----Original Message----- > From: STARK, BARBARA H [mailto:bs7652@att.com] > Sent: martedì 11 ottobre 2011 17.01 > To: Fred Baker; Maglione Roberta > Cc: v6ops@ietf.org; draft-ietf-v6ops-6204bis@tools.ietf.org > Subject: RE: [v6ops] new draft: draft-ietf-v6ops-6204bis > > Where I think we were was: > PCP as a LAN technology (from hosts to CE router) will not be included > in the draft. There's a lot of open issues and discussion around PCP vs. > UPnP, lack of host adoption, let the marketplace decide, etc. > PCP as a WAN technology (proxying UPnP IGD Port Forwarding, *if* the CE > router supports UPnP IGD) would be in scope of what we're trying to do, > but there's concern that the unpublished nature of PCP might hold things > up. > > Barbara > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: v6ops-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:v6ops-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf >> Of Fred Baker >> Sent: Tuesday, October 11, 2011 10:33 AM >> To: Maglione Roberta >> Cc: v6ops@ietf.org; draft-ietf-v6ops-6204bis@tools.ietf.org >> Subject: Re: [v6ops] new draft: draft-ietf-v6ops-6204bis >> >> >> On Oct 11, 2011, at 10:23 AM, Maglione Roberta wrote: >> >>> Hello, >>> a question for the authors: >>> Do you have any plan to include the requirements for PCP in this >> draft? >> >> wearing the chair hat. >> >> I'm not sure I detect a consensus behind the requirement for PCP. I >> personally would like to see it there, but I haven't heard a lot of >> commentary on that besides your request. >> >> PCP is a protocol that would be used within the home to enable >> applications within the home to open holes in the firewall. The >> discussion at IETF-81 was that the characteristics of the LAN are now >> the province of homenet, and as such don't belong in this draft. This >> draft describes the characteristics of the CPE Router's WAN-facing >> side. >> >> There is also an issue with PCP; it is currently a draft, and has not >> been sent to the IESG. Several operators have expressed some urgency >> for getting an RFC number on this so that they can include it in RFPs >> for managed routers. If we insert a normative reference to an internet >> draft, this cannot be published as an RFC until that draft is also >> published. >> >> The working group can override me - if we see a number of operators >> asking for PCP to be mentioned in the draft, the authors will review >> that decision. But right now, that seems like a question for homenet. >> >>> Thanks, >>> Regards, >>> Roberta > > Questo messaggio e i suoi allegati sono indirizzati esclusivamente alle persone indicate. La diffusione, copia o qualsiasi altra azione derivante dalla conoscenza di queste informazioni sono rigorosamente vietate. Qualora abbiate ricevuto questo documento per errore siete cortesemente pregati di darne immediata comunicazione al mittente e di provvedere alla sua distruzione, Grazie. > > This e-mail and any attachments is confidential and may contain privileged information intended for the addressee(s) only. Dissemination, copying, printing or use by anybody else is unauthorised. If you are not the intended recipient, please delete this message and any attachments and advise the sender by return e-mail, Thanks. > _______________________________________________ v6ops mailing list v6ops@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops
- Re: [v6ops] new draft: draft-ietf-v6ops-6204bis Maglione Roberta
- [v6ops] new draft: draft-ietf-v6ops-6204bis fred
- Re: [v6ops] new draft: draft-ietf-v6ops-6204bis Fred Baker
- Re: [v6ops] new draft: draft-ietf-v6ops-6204bis STARK, BARBARA H
- Re: [v6ops] new draft: draft-ietf-v6ops-6204bis Maglione Roberta
- Re: [v6ops] new draft: draft-ietf-v6ops-6204bis Fred Baker
- Re: [v6ops] new draft: draft-ietf-v6ops-6204bis Fred Baker
- Re: [v6ops] new draft: draft-ietf-v6ops-6204bis STARK, BARBARA H
- Re: [v6ops] new draft: draft-ietf-v6ops-6204bis Maglione Roberta
- Re: [v6ops] new draft: draft-ietf-v6ops-6204bis Hemant Singh (shemant)
- Re: [v6ops] new draft: draft-ietf-v6ops-6204bis Simon Perreault
- Re: [v6ops] new draft: draft-ietf-v6ops-6204bis Fred Baker
- Re: [v6ops] new draft: draft-ietf-v6ops-6204bis STARK, BARBARA H
- Re: [v6ops] new draft: draft-ietf-v6ops-6204bis Fred Baker
- Re: [v6ops] new draft: draft-ietf-v6ops-6204bis Maglione Roberta
- Re: [v6ops] new draft: draft-ietf-v6ops-6204bis Ole Troan
- Re: [v6ops] new draft: draft-ietf-v6ops-6204bis Maglione Roberta
- Re: [v6ops] new draft: draft-ietf-v6ops-6204bis christian.jacquenet
- Re: [v6ops] new draft: draft-ietf-v6ops-6204bis Simon Perreault
- Re: [v6ops] new draft: draft-ietf-v6ops-6204bis François-Xavier Le Bail
- Re: [v6ops] new draft: draft-ietf-v6ops-6204bis Stuart Cheshire
- Re: [v6ops] new draft: draft-ietf-v6ops-6204bis christian.jacquenet
- Re: [v6ops] new draft: draft-ietf-v6ops-6204bis Hemant Singh (shemant)
- Re: [v6ops] new draft: draft-ietf-v6ops-6204bis Stuart Cheshire
- Re: [v6ops] new draft: draft-ietf-v6ops-6204bis Lorenzo Colitti
- [v6ops] new draft: draft-ietf-v6ops-6204bis Tassos Chatzithomaoglou
- Re: [v6ops] new draft: draft-ietf-v6ops-6204bis Hemant Singh (shemant)
- Re: [v6ops] new draft: draft-ietf-v6ops-6204bis Hemant Singh (shemant)
- Re: [v6ops] new draft: draft-ietf-v6ops-6204bis Dan Wing
- Re: [v6ops] new draft: draft-ietf-v6ops-6204bis Dan Wing
- Re: [v6ops] new draft: draft-ietf-v6ops-6204bis Dan Wing
- Re: [v6ops] new draft: draft-ietf-v6ops-6204bis Dan Wing
- Re: [v6ops] new draft: draft-ietf-v6ops-6204bis Tassos Chatzithomaoglou
- Re: [v6ops] new draft: draft-ietf-v6ops-6204bis Dan Wing
- Re: [v6ops] new draft: draft-ietf-v6ops-6204bis Hemant Singh (shemant)
- Re: [v6ops] new draft: draft-ietf-v6ops-6204bis Doug Barton
- Re: [v6ops] new draft: draft-ietf-v6ops-6204bis Tassos Chatzithomaoglou
- Re: [v6ops] new draft: draft-ietf-v6ops-6204bis Hemant Singh (shemant)
- Re: [v6ops] new draft: draft-ietf-v6ops-6204bis Fred Baker
- Re: [v6ops] new draft: draft-ietf-v6ops-6204bis Tassos Chatzithomaoglou
- Re: [v6ops] new draft: draft-ietf-v6ops-6204bis mohamed.boucadair
- Re: [v6ops] new draft: draft-ietf-v6ops-6204bis Hemant Singh (shemant)
- Re: [v6ops] new draft: draft-ietf-v6ops-6204bis Hemant Singh (shemant)
- Re: [v6ops] new draft: draft-ietf-v6ops-6204bis mohamed.boucadair
- Re: [v6ops] new draft: draft-ietf-v6ops-6204bis Hemant Singh (shemant)
- Re: [v6ops] new draft: draft-ietf-v6ops-6204bis james woodyatt
- Re: [v6ops] new draft: draft-ietf-v6ops-6204bis Hemant Singh (shemant)
- Re: [v6ops] new draft: draft-ietf-v6ops-6204bis Ole Troan
- Re: [v6ops] new draft: draft-ietf-v6ops-6204bis Hemant Singh (shemant)
- Re: [v6ops] new draft: draft-ietf-v6ops-6204bis Weil, Jason
- Re: [v6ops] new draft: draft-ietf-v6ops-6204bis STARK, BARBARA H
- Re: [v6ops] new draft: draft-ietf-v6ops-6204bis Victor Kuarsingh
- Re: [v6ops] new draft: draft-ietf-v6ops-6204bis Tassos Chatzithomaoglou
- Re: [v6ops] new draft: draft-ietf-v6ops-6204bis Ole Troan
- Re: [v6ops] new draft: draft-ietf-v6ops-6204bis mohamed.boucadair
- Re: [v6ops] new draft: draft-ietf-v6ops-6204bis Tassos Chatzithomaoglou
- Re: [v6ops] new draft: draft-ietf-v6ops-6204bis Hemant Singh (shemant)
- Re: [v6ops] new draft: draft-ietf-v6ops-6204bis Hemant Singh (shemant)
- Re: [v6ops] new draft: draft-ietf-v6ops-6204bis Maglione Roberta
- Re: [v6ops] new draft: draft-ietf-v6ops-6204bis Hemant Singh (shemant)
- Re: [v6ops] new draft: draft-ietf-v6ops-6204bis james woodyatt
- Re: [v6ops] new draft: draft-ietf-v6ops-6204bis Wes Beebee
- Re: [v6ops] new draft: draft-ietf-v6ops-6204bis STARK, BARBARA H
- Re: [v6ops] new draft: draft-ietf-v6ops-6204bis Hemant Singh (shemant)
- Re: [v6ops] new draft: draft-ietf-v6ops-6204bis Wes Beebee
- Re: [v6ops] new draft: draft-ietf-v6ops-6204bis Alain Durand
- Re: [v6ops] new draft: draft-ietf-v6ops-6204bis Hemant Singh (shemant)
- Re: [v6ops] new draft: draft-ietf-v6ops-6204bis Reinaldo Penno
- Re: [v6ops] new draft: draft-ietf-v6ops-6204bis Hemant Singh (shemant)
- Re: [v6ops] new draft: draft-ietf-v6ops-6204bis Dan Wing
- Re: [v6ops] new draft: draft-ietf-v6ops-6204bis christian.jacquenet
- Re: [v6ops] new draft: draft-ietf-v6ops-6204bis Ole Troan
- Re: [v6ops] new draft: draft-ietf-v6ops-6204bis mohamed.boucadair
- Re: [v6ops] new draft: draft-ietf-v6ops-6204bis Hemant Singh (shemant)
- Re: [v6ops] new draft: draft-ietf-v6ops-6204bis mohamed.boucadair
- Re: [v6ops] new draft: draft-ietf-v6ops-6204bis Lorenzo Colitti
- Re: [v6ops] new draft: draft-ietf-v6ops-6204bis Tina TSOU
- Re: [v6ops] new draft: draft-ietf-v6ops-6204bis Hemant Singh (shemant)
- Re: [v6ops] new draft: draft-ietf-v6ops-6204bis Hemant Singh (shemant)
- Re: [v6ops] new draft: draft-ietf-v6ops-6204bis Reinaldo Penno
- Re: [v6ops] new draft: draft-ietf-v6ops-6204bis mohamed.boucadair
- Re: [v6ops] new draft: draft-ietf-v6ops-6204bis james woodyatt
- Re: [v6ops] new draft: draft-ietf-v6ops-6204bis Jeroen Massar
- Re: [v6ops] new draft: draft-ietf-v6ops-6204bis Jared Mauch
- Re: [v6ops] new draft: draft-ietf-v6ops-6204bis Jeroen Massar
- Re: [v6ops] new draft: draft-ietf-v6ops-6204bis james woodyatt
- Re: [v6ops] new draft: draft-ietf-v6ops-6204bis Dan Wing
- Re: [v6ops] new draft: draft-ietf-v6ops-6204bis Hemant Singh (shemant)
- Re: [v6ops] new draft: draft-ietf-v6ops-6204bis james woodyatt
- Re: [v6ops] new draft: draft-ietf-v6ops-6204bis Jared Mauch
- Re: [v6ops] new draft: draft-ietf-v6ops-6204bis Mark Andrews
- Re: [v6ops] new draft: draft-ietf-v6ops-6204bis Lorenzo Colitti
- Re: [v6ops] new draft: draft-ietf-v6ops-6204bis Lorenzo Colitti
- Re: [v6ops] new draft: draft-ietf-v6ops-6204bis Lorenzo Colitti
- Re: [v6ops] new draft: draft-ietf-v6ops-6204bis james woodyatt
- Re: [v6ops] new draft: draft-ietf-v6ops-6204bis Ray Hunter
- Re: [v6ops] new draft: draft-ietf-v6ops-6204bis Washam Fan
- Re: [v6ops] new draft: draft-ietf-v6ops-6204bis Hemant Singh (shemant)
- Re: [v6ops] new draft: draft-ietf-v6ops-6204bis SM
- Re: [v6ops] new draft: draft-ietf-v6ops-6204bis Ray Hunter
- Re: [v6ops] new draft: draft-ietf-v6ops-6204bis Lorenzo Colitti