Re: [v6ops] Preparing IETF 91 agenda
joel jaeggli <joelja@bogus.com> Tue, 07 October 2014 01:23 UTC
Return-Path: <joelja@bogus.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D8C51A90FA for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 6 Oct 2014 18:23:02 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.769
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.769 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FH_HOST_EQ_D_D_D_D=0.765, HELO_MISMATCH_ORG=0.611, HOST_MISMATCH_COM=0.311, RDNS_DYNAMIC=0.982] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ahykovz8jkmH for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 6 Oct 2014 18:23:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from minorthreat.org (ec2-54-68-221-247.us-west-2.compute.amazonaws.com [54.68.221.247]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1D2DF1A90FE for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Mon, 6 Oct 2014 18:23:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mb-aye.local (c-67-188-0-113.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [67.188.0.113]) (authenticated bits=0) by minorthreat.org (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id s971MfsO038927 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT); Tue, 7 Oct 2014 01:22:42 GMT (envelope-from joelja@bogus.com)
Message-ID: <5433406A.5060401@bogus.com>
Date: Mon, 06 Oct 2014 18:22:50 -0700
From: joel jaeggli <joelja@bogus.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.9; rv:33.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/33.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "Fred Baker (fred)" <fred@cisco.com>, IPv6 Operations <v6ops@ietf.org>
References: <DDCFDE78-07A2-4C0D-B1BD-88456513826C@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <DDCFDE78-07A2-4C0D-B1BD-88456513826C@cisco.com>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha1"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="3NTQv9mPqEGP2LENbMoB4GiqMtDTC7RTq"
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/9O7qMjdG2Vk9mqFGholI1FI1PHU
Subject: Re: [v6ops] Preparing IETF 91 agenda
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 07 Oct 2014 01:23:02 -0000
On 10/6/14 5:09 PM, Fred Baker (fred) wrote: > As I mentioned last week, Lee and I are pulling together an agenda for IETF 91. The drop-dead date for new or updated drafts is 27 October, and frankly it will work better if drafts arrive earlier - as we are looking for working group commentary on them. > > Current state of play: > > IESG: > Jul 31 draft-ietf-v6ops-enterprise-incremental-ipv6 > Sep 1 draft-ietf-v6ops-ipv6-roaming-analysis > > IETF Last Call: > Sep 26 draft-ietf-v6ops-mobile-device-profile > > Working Group Document updated since IETF: > Sep 18 draft-ietf-v6ops-design-choices > > Individual Submission updated since IETF: > Aug 24 draft-v6ops-pmtud-ecmp-problem > On list, Ray Hunter suggests someone write "a draft summarizing the ICMP PTB problem" Imho that fine by me and I might be willing to contribute if someone picks up the pen, but it's not the problem I have really. the problem I have in specific is not dropping the packets I do receive on the floor, which is an operational one for which I have a mitigation. I don't expect further discussion for the existing draft is warranted at this meeting since it was largely revved to address commentary from the last meeting. thanks joel > Sep 10 draft-gont-v6ops-ipv6-ehs-in-real-world > There has been some discussion on-list. > Sep 15 draft-anderson-v6ops-siit-dc-2xlat > No list commentary > Sep 18 draft-elkins-v6ops-multicast-virtual-nodes > Some commentary, not supportive > Sep 18 draft-wang-v6ops-xlat-prefix-discovery > A fair amount of discussion, mostly anti-NAT. > Sep 25 draft-ybai-v6ops-ipv6-for-openstack > no list commentary > Oct 5 draft-anderson-v6ops-siit-dc > Some list commentary > > Working Group Document NOT updated since IETF: > Jun 18 draft-ietf-v6ops-dhcpv6-slaac-problem > Jul 4 draft-ietf-v6ops-ula-usage-recommendations > > Individual Submission NOT updated since IETF: > Apr 7 draft-smith-v6ops-mitigate-rtr-dos-mld-slctd-node > Jul 3 draft-liu-v6ops-running-multiple-prefixes > Jul 4 draft-sun-v6ops-xlat-multi > Jul 4 draft-yourtchenko-chown-rupik-v6ops-dad-3x > Jul 20 draft-wang-v6ops-flow-label-refelction > Jul 21 draft-liu-v6ops-dhcpv6-slaac-guidance > > more data at http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/search/?sort=status&activedrafts=on&name=v6ops >
- [v6ops] Preparing IETF 91 agenda Fred Baker (fred)
- Re: [v6ops] Preparing IETF 91 agenda joel jaeggli
- Re: [v6ops] Preparing IETF 91 agenda Ruri Hiromi
- Re: [v6ops] Preparing IETF 91 agenda Fred Baker (fred)
- Re: [v6ops] Preparing IETF 91 agenda Mikael Abrahamsson
- Re: [v6ops] Preparing IETF 91 agenda Ruri Hiromi
- Re: [v6ops] Preparing IETF 91 agenda 神明達哉
- Re: [v6ops] Preparing IETF 91 agenda Fernando Gont