IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] Scope of Unique Local IPv6 Unicast Addresses (Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-gont-6man-ipv6-ula-scope-00.txt)

Gert Doering <gert@space.net> Thu, 25 February 2021 16:59 UTC

Return-Path: <gert@space.net>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F1563A1D92 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 25 Feb 2021 08:59:34 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.099
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.099 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=space.net
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id lbJshWfpWnhL for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 25 Feb 2021 08:59:31 -0800 (PST)
Received: from gatekeeper1-relay.space.net (gatekeeper1-relay.space.net [IPv6:2001:608:3:85::38]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 26B9F3A1D2F for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Thu, 25 Feb 2021 08:59:20 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=space.net; i=@space.net; q=dns/txt; s=esa; t=1614272361; x=1645808361; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=B03BOpwdVL0ccZ7uzqqI7l1/p1HTW8vTCwwgrfK7hdE=; b=FY0ZrST1cOHl1cNTTeYF0ABekpqgQ9qG1sThpkvb+9CAgLphjB7YJqX9 xYwD380I36iR4oqz2BDdBmewRFy1vlsbL1vr2yMZyyZ39sQD5KuCPAzuY UNYj2GC6eA+YtyWFODOQB5npP4H9OPQz/MV4s/dFgE2Hg8OEpOE3xHYts SGpPkohLEqSt7RaQ8AYc2HCTxJstEmaogsBu7iSfyifUoEKq9NL/XtGjY vmLGH7Yl7Y+8tbD8icW3zDl055vY7QO3q8zOcZvk8bG4FLltqaTuOyC03 RaO/iMtZnSGPw7k8d3VopDVFpicjl3tLG8MMwFfdQq131efZksXafcRne g==;
IronPort-SDR: dMrbNWJuf3kYkTjqlvIShmeDnxoEV7mjIurZqiUvQ/dcSqGA6EnppnYYN3KCIPIcWOOm1Fw8bu thrUqNinGBWLYjwdTzh0nrQrAild0Cx6Xe80SH+k21zNiIMv0ns8G+dvgaC486CV+qfno3fxV+ IQ2VWkI9GpF45VpB706FfTBAsTPeNSkHX55jeB6jnZY4vfUk0BkcFC/sB/cSEbLLCNIj8YVxcU OO06n7BR+YFjCZzNIuykKIoRXi9FRAX9Sc9OL2H28nNtAqsaDspF6QA/oX5l1tByssuEGhtx/5 h/E=
X-SpaceNet-SBRS: None
Received: from mobil.space.net ([195.30.115.67]) by gatekeeper1-relay.space.net with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 25 Feb 2021 17:59:16 +0100
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietf.org
Received: from mobil.space.net (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by mobil.space.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0CD9D43B99 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Thu, 25 Feb 2021 17:59:16 +0100 (CET)
X-SpaceNet-Relay: true
X-SpaceNet-Relay: true
X-SpaceNet-Relay: true
X-SpaceNet-Relay: true
X-SpaceNet-Relay: true
X-SpaceNet-Relay: true
Received: from moebius4.space.net (moebius4.space.net [IPv6:2001:608:2:2::251]) by mobil.space.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 77C2543B98; Thu, 25 Feb 2021 17:59:15 +0100 (CET)
Received: by moebius4.space.net (Postfix, from userid 1007) id 715E4109421; Thu, 25 Feb 2021 17:59:15 +0100 (CET)
Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2021 17:59:15 +0100
From: Gert Doering <gert@space.net>
To: Owen DeLong <owen@delong.com>
Cc: Gert Doering <gert@space.net>, Fernando Gont <fgont@si6networks.com>, "Manfredi (US), Albert E" <albert.e.manfredi@boeing.com>, IPv6 Operations <v6ops@ietf.org>, "6man@ietf.org" <6man@ietf.org>
Message-ID: <YDfXY13wEOaIuBMU@Space.Net>
References: <a5b9b8566ce446d3a5e5dcc9ca2fbac2@boeing.com> <CAN-Dau1xD21EpqrSXKHLzADPyjeWcwc=phHGSFP8cj6705O2BQ@mail.gmail.com> <5f0f480a-b331-7f0c-a738-5d80bd8569e6@si6networks.com> <02dd48fbe6cc44c482662fdc1978219f@boeing.com> <4908665c-94cf-810f-8bff-7407e3abe099@si6networks.com> <c09cfe42-f74b-ccaf-f03b-fb6942ed890f@gmail.com> <061050f0-6034-d11c-1898-24bc8461aed9@si6networks.com> <YDEX/Uu9X2hm+RX/@Space.Net> <F652A983-7624-4D23-8C54-A1990C55B687@delong.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha256"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="WdSE3DFrJ46/1WjK"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <F652A983-7624-4D23-8C54-A1990C55B687@delong.com>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/9bmVr4RuLzxMykLOQgFXa9Ir05A>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] Scope of Unique Local IPv6 Unicast Addresses (Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-gont-6man-ipv6-ula-scope-00.txt)
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2021 16:59:41 -0000

Hi,

On Tue, Feb 23, 2021 at 03:18:44PM -0800, Owen DeLong wrote:
> > In practice, how much IPv6 multicast is there which is not "node" and
> > "link" scoped?  Or, to be even more picky, not "link" scoped?
> A lot less than there should be.

I beg to differ on that...  among all the problems IPv6 has, "lack of
multicast" is not one...

Wide-scale routed multicast is a very nice idea, but totally non-deployable
across network boundaries in reality.  We've tried, for many years (with
IPv4), and every time a customer wanted to use it, it was broken in some
non-debuggable way (like, RP-Tree selecting a path in 3549 where they forgot
to turn on PIM on the interfaces...).

Even on-link multicast gets broken by switch vendors often enough.

Gert Doering
        -- NetMaster
-- 
have you enabled IPv6 on something today...?

SpaceNet AG                      Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard, Michael Emmer
Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14        Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann
D-80807 Muenchen                 HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen)
Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444         USt-IdNr.: DE813185279

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email