Re: [v6ops] Revised Internet Drafts for allocation of IPv6 space for LISP EIDs

Brian Haberman <brian@innovationslab.net> Wed, 23 October 2013 15:37 UTC

Return-Path: <brian@innovationslab.net>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1FD0A11E83EF for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 23 Oct 2013 08:37:16 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.524
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.524 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.075, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id cog2dRgsG44d for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 23 Oct 2013 08:37:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from uillean.fuaim.com (uillean.fuaim.com [206.197.161.140]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5EFBF11E83D7 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Wed, 23 Oct 2013 08:37:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from clairseach.fuaim.com (clairseach-high.fuaim.com [206.197.161.158]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by uillean.fuaim.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 12BFD8810A; Wed, 23 Oct 2013 08:36:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from 10252520.rudm1.ra.johnshopkins.edu (addr16212925014.ippl.jhmi.edu [162.129.250.14]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by clairseach.fuaim.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9FC50136811A; Wed, 23 Oct 2013 08:36:57 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <5267ED12.4090602@innovationslab.net>
Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2013 11:36:50 -0400
From: Brian Haberman <brian@innovationslab.net>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.7; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.0.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@google.com>
References: <28CFF7E5-E98E-4D97-B7F4-3A18C255253C@gigix.net> <D62C71FC-306F-4F91-97E2-84D6F64A58A3@istaff.org> <5267E96B.1000802@innovationslab.net> <20131023152549.GN50205@Space.Net> <5267EB60.7080105@innovationslab.net> <CAKD1Yr1SpS0e3qDkZyRsiSB-a_oXCi7nWKe2szxW34mJfhJnxw@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAKD1Yr1SpS0e3qDkZyRsiSB-a_oXCi7nWKe2szxW34mJfhJnxw@mail.gmail.com>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.5.2
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="3CDDt6ewvRsbp6QllpnsGH1RiF95LnjxC"
Cc: "v6ops@ietf.org WG" <v6ops@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] Revised Internet Drafts for allocation of IPv6 space for LISP EIDs
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/v6ops>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2013 15:37:16 -0000

Hi Lorenzo,

On 10/23/13 11:31 AM, Lorenzo Colitti wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 24, 2013 at 12:29 AM, Brian Haberman
> <brian@innovationslab.net>wrote;wrote:
> 
>> "In order to provide connectivity between the Legacy Internet and LISP
>> sites, PITRs announcing large aggregates (ideally one single large
>> aggregate) of the IPv6 EID Block could be deployed."
>>
> 
> That sounds very much like a 6to4 relay router, which experience has shown
> was an unworkable deployment model. Why is this different?
> 

It's not different.  But, that is the tact the LISP WG is trying to
take.  Keep in mind that the referenced draft went through IETF Last
Call and was subsequently sent back to the WG due to the concerns raised
about routing and potentially creating a parallel address registry
outside of the RIRs.

Regards,
Brian