Re: [v6ops] Are we competitive?

Fred Baker <fredbaker.ietf@gmail.com> Thu, 28 July 2022 19:53 UTC

Return-Path: <fredbaker.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6DAC1C15948F for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 28 Jul 2022 12:53:50 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.109
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.109 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id VudV0YcVJxN9 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 28 Jul 2022 12:53:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pl1-x635.google.com (mail-pl1-x635.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::635]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4BCF8C15C521 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Thu, 28 Jul 2022 12:53:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pl1-x635.google.com with SMTP id v18so2680958plo.8 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Thu, 28 Jul 2022 12:53:48 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=to:references:message-id:content-transfer-encoding:cc:date :in-reply-to:from:subject:mime-version:from:to:cc; bh=KK7x6giKC9PyjZuisM/+rMlkYMo0qGigtnrWODDDUjw=; b=Kf+9j2EXvAjEUPqbZPiPXeWUYDD4TqZ+6xaFBjbacUR99ItSIZLbQIkI3UpzBZGrtw VCX+LZh1ZxlpOXuPyZPqv3m/WPUA+rZNhtdQsi8Fsh9C6U+k1NCkQ8TzU4tW9Yapjb0o ENmOyrvPF3k9zp1bkou2fCRU5gy1OHyltATQ+sp4OGzfxBRl7ie8YqceeFnR86h+CR6Y +Z9zHAt2Srg5PipJOMC19GjpS313abY1iaitXJjyfulTi9k9OZMJ4T9Q/niv9o1N/wI2 hWsbbNu/3K/2BGObpOf/oFbK5P+qxzPkfgt1LaVQAnKJJz8OMyirDaLe3rwo0P0BRvE5 GbLg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=to:references:message-id:content-transfer-encoding:cc:date :in-reply-to:from:subject:mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc; bh=KK7x6giKC9PyjZuisM/+rMlkYMo0qGigtnrWODDDUjw=; b=nqqCH7F9XCH1+lZilY2dC5jlBiDl9Rli3Txc7MXUzb5LQxE/fWDztRhNSuzRHUH9dT T+RpfJq0XVYNjjSPpDa9Hc8DSafisv5PWk81zgVuniKBzYoveowXRZjTV1xC2SiPcTgC BLgSDvoWM+PPm96AvS95uxQpsTgWhjU5NS2nKjCdghzHmjv0gJz5gTF8kB2BJhmULc+6 HFlkPeIklP9fyMFB4lYqgd/J6fdP5NIBbYLbBdYqWxS9a3Kh01U8S7cUnpTvDda93EJ+ vEZgqq7elUDcHLbKD//kgaTVmB/olDckB2WbAkiueE7Y2qHaTkSz99oAQ2Oy68byph7M WwmQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: ACgBeo27xYct1TnNnnEuhOrHQcg4GrwqQp8Y+FlkuPh0rPz8HvxKpY+I /LC7eQw7w10KhdRAuNFEeYg=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AA6agR57c4CasZJ7s/W6+oib+21JRPKZfv+Qg9K4GhtwsgPLBFO3IDO6SGpT6SbsrhULe6liEnZ1jA==
X-Received: by 2002:a17:903:292:b0:16d:5e43:bd9e with SMTP id j18-20020a170903029200b0016d5e43bd9emr436118plr.116.1659038027463; Thu, 28 Jul 2022 12:53:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtpclient.apple (ip68-111-231-227.sd.sd.cox.net. [68.111.231.227]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id u132-20020a62798a000000b00527bb6fff6csm1159032pfc.119.2022.07.28.12.53.46 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 28 Jul 2022 12:53:46 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 16.0 \(3696.120.41.1.1\))
From: Fred Baker <fredbaker.ietf@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <ec68b29c62034d3e98adec9c5da45ff3@huawei.com>
Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2022 12:53:45 -0700
Cc: Gert Doering <gert@space.net>, Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>, IPv6 Operations <v6ops@ietf.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <738101AC-3478-4B27-912C-D778BF25C2FF@gmail.com>
References: <e4a35f0c-757a-aefa-c211-05b6015a4215@gmail.com> <YuJXbruluDmzF3RD@Space.Net> <ec68b29c62034d3e98adec9c5da45ff3@huawei.com>
To: Xipengxiao <xipengxiao=40huawei.com@dmarc.ietf.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3696.120.41.1.1)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/ACte9aOlPyZ10Zpnoq3Q5zBV5sE>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] Are we competitive?
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2022 19:53:50 -0000

I think the next step is to get people to sign up to writing the documents you suggest.

> On Jul 28, 2022, at 11:59 AM, Xipengxiao <xipengxiao=40huawei.com@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:
> 
> If we want to attract more residents to the forest (IPv6 adopters), it’s more important to fix the forest than to fix the trees.  Some ideas: 
> ·       Provide better tour guide book (i.e. IPv6 solution overviews): There are about 500 IPv6-related RFCs.  Some are obsoleted and some are conflicting.  I think we should summarizing them and providing guidelines, so that people can read fewer RFCs to master IPv6.  (e.g. the ND deployment guideline draft summarizing 30+ RFCs into 1 draft)
> ·       Among the many possible routes (e.g. solutions), recommend only the most popular ones (e.g. recommend only Dual-Stack, 464XLAT and MAP-T among the 10+ transition solutions).   
> ·       Provide better road signs in the forest (i.e. solution guidelines): IPv6 solutions are almost complete.  Now it’s more important to write guidelines to simplify operations than to develop more solutions.
> ·       Identify haphazard places in the forest, and post clear “caution” signs (i.e. identify IPv6 operations/performance issues, and provide guidelines/BCPs)
> ·       Enlist existing residents to share experience on how to settle into this forest (i.e. case sharing from Cisco, Alibaba etc).
>