Re: [v6ops] PCP server in draft-ietf-v6ops-6204bis

Tim Chown <tjc@ecs.soton.ac.uk> Mon, 12 March 2012 21:54 UTC

Return-Path: <tjc@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D9F9121F899E for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 12 Mar 2012 14:54:13 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.556
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.556 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.044, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id lDWL2jkunN8o for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 12 Mar 2012 14:54:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from falcon.ecs.soton.ac.uk (falcon.ecs.soton.ac.uk [IPv6:2001:630:d0:f102::25e]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0688F21E8051 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Mon, 12 Mar 2012 14:54:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from falcon.ecs.soton.ac.uk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by falcon.ecs.soton.ac.uk (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id q2CLs8Kl026295 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Mon, 12 Mar 2012 21:54:08 GMT
X-DKIM: Sendmail DKIM Filter v2.8.2 falcon.ecs.soton.ac.uk q2CLs8Kl026295
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=simple/simple; d=ecs.soton.ac.uk; s=200903; t=1331589248; bh=CF9Iu6ZLJVd3R+wV6WXiZxO8eR4=; h=Mime-Version:Subject:From:In-Reply-To:Date:References:To; b=1Rc7zJIUTxmElgBVHATRTJ39gRqc51vP4UaOjU4z2yqoqZ1sORjJcK2euTDfl0mNE TnoMd/RD2q/6tb6uuUbBq+eiCRnpGJpBocCcfjtbBXt91FX2+GTUV/CNnD73JQDkQ8 JTTjhPJvYYu0/PRYCKJ0AR5wNVvA1F/C65BABOFA=
Received: from gander.ecs.soton.ac.uk ([2001:630:d0:f102:250:56ff:fea0:401]) by falcon.ecs.soton.ac.uk (falcon.ecs.soton.ac.uk [2001:630:d0:f102:250:56ff:fea0:68da]) envelope-from <tjc@ecs.soton.ac.uk> with ESMTP id o2BLs805437369615l ret-id none; Mon, 12 Mar 2012 21:54:08 +0000
Received: from [192.168.1.102] (host213-123-213-183.in-addr.btopenworld.com [213.123.213.183]) (authenticated bits=0) by gander.ecs.soton.ac.uk (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id q2CLqmHX015770 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO) for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Mon, 12 Mar 2012 21:52:49 GMT
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1257)
From: Tim Chown <tjc@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
In-Reply-To: <5B6B2B64C9FE2A489045EEEADDAFF2C304076437@XMB-RCD-109.cisco.com>
Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2012 21:52:48 +0000
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <EMEW3|5752734161cd7b9ee72c6b70f515c95co2BLs803tjc|ecs.soton.ac.uk|447B48D0-C66D-4051-A0D5-25A084745797@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
References: "29 Jan 2012 09:51:52PST."<85BE2EBF-C8AC-45E1-BF93-1E3066AD3172@apple.com><201201301936.q0UJaEft000156@givry.fdupont.fr><2D09D61DDFA73D4C884805CC7865E611025B49@GAALPA1MSGUSR9N.ITServices.sbc.com><4A687585-399D-4077-91AC-A1DC4F101E03@apple.com><2D09D61DDFA73D4C884805CC7865E611025BFE@GAALPA1MSGUSR9N.ITServices.sbc.com><30931DE1-9E57-4296-B0FE-FA98F840D78F@apple.com><5B6B2B64C9FE2A489045EEEADDAFF2C3040761AD@XMB-RCD-109.cisco.com> <4F43A296.2070207@viagenie.ca> <5B6B2B64C9FE2A489045EEEADDAFF2C304076437@XMB-RCD-109.cisco.com> <447B48D0-C66D-4051-A0D5-25A084745797@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
To: IPv6 Operations <v6ops@ietf.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1257)
X-ECS-MailScanner: Found to be clean, Found to be clean
X-smtpf-Report: sid=o2BLs8054373696100; tid=o2BLs805437369615l; client=relay,forged,no_ptr,ipv6; mail=; rcpt=; nrcpt=1:0; fails=0
X-ECS-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information
X-ECS-MailScanner-ID: q2CLs8Kl026295
X-ECS-MailScanner-From: tjc@ecs.soton.ac.uk
Subject: Re: [v6ops] PCP server in draft-ietf-v6ops-6204bis
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/v6ops>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2012 21:54:14 -0000

On 21 Feb 2012, at 17:46, Hemant Singh (shemant) wrote:
> 
> The other reason is that the LAN behavior of a CPE router is under the
> homenet WG charter for over one year back.  Rfc6204bis stays away from
> any new LAN behavior for the CPE router.

Well, at present the homenet architecture text states that transparent,
end-to-end communications to/from the subnet should be supported, but
at the same time that the default border policy is "Simple Security" with
support for a hole-punching signalling protocol to accompany that.  It also
states that a "transparent" mode should be configurable at the border.

Tim