IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] Implementation Status of PREF64

Owen DeLong <owen@delong.com> Fri, 08 October 2021 21:05 UTC

Return-Path: <owen@delong.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 297923A0976; Fri, 8 Oct 2021 14:05:36 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 1.236
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.236 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_SBL_CSS=3.335, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=delong.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Nb1WlZVI7v2P; Fri, 8 Oct 2021 14:05:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from owen.delong.com (owen.delong.com [IPv6:2620:0:930::200:2]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C9DD03A096E; Fri, 8 Oct 2021 14:05:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtpclient.apple ([12.33.220.202]) (authenticated bits=0) by owen.delong.com (8.16.1/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id 198L5TUL989925 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Fri, 8 Oct 2021 14:05:30 -0700
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 owen.delong.com 198L5TUL989925
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=delong.com; s=mail; t=1633727130; bh=BrbSglIxuqBqllyNVVrEFtRXvt6jz8KQSTQ1bLOQ8G0=; h=Subject:From:In-Reply-To:Date:Cc:References:To:From; b=mEvEkvOKXlpLsqGtiR8aLUXoOchThnBkMC1PQWG9m2qKNJ/itnlELiSrhXDmMxKot kCm/BQpEGl+GAxm27YmCd53vVjbvhCmPP8+zVRKT3nBUfWipj7ix+wZjqyzK7+A4rE eMFuqkW2dXTyTk1ROvyaU96dOKzaOh/ni32CFQIQ=
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 14.0 \(3654.120.0.1.13\))
From: Owen DeLong <owen@delong.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAN-Dau0WP_4RsS65K3V4aFT8-DfxaCWTaGSuXytXeN=eWUuo7A@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 08 Oct 2021 14:05:29 -0700
Cc: "STARK, BARBARA H" <bs7652@att.com>, v6ops list <v6ops@ietf.org>, Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo=40google.com@dmarc.ietf.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <7AD09E97-AFC4-4227-A1F2-6CB275E2E26E@delong.com>
References: <DDA36020-90CC-471B-83AD-3D98950F1164@delong.com> <CAKD1Yr0T-7t-UHbsJBMLpTjKhPAV5uUQkux6oby89TVUue7PyA@mail.gmail.com> <CO1PR11MB4881D400EA4681F1505040D2D8AA9@CO1PR11MB4881.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> <CAKD1Yr3TmqFxjKuZ57wS7VuPOf6rJvOwnvnQdFrRLQ=DkZ+CCw@mail.gmail.com> <CO1PR11MB4881F411A4D5BEA7A8479726D8AA9@CO1PR11MB4881.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> <D8AEA194-293B-43E4-BCAE-33CD81FB7D8C@delong.com> <CAKD1Yr2Tug-PFV7wAh0s6-gw8W3LcLG7wC1fD7Lu_hMZQYKdtw@mail.gmail.com> <08D2885E-B824-48E8-9703-DCA98771FA37@delong.com> <CAKD1Yr2EVsY3tYUf56R0Q1+KVrowtqh-HgwXj5vxzy4wd-vkTg@mail.gmail.com> <1A6ED87B-666E-439C-852F-2E5C904C0515@delong.com> <CAKD1Yr23fY2DJDvB-9eVFRsxnBnZQ0kZuZfYUfRUHYW=_D=enA@mail.gmail.com> <CAN-Dau1z0q0R61x7iY+Wg_cFRU0jmqr+fR0y=bSXxj+K-n722w@mail.gmail.com> <CAKD1Yr1T_mXfxJGHOrBfqZfexm6GTrUqnFi57710pTroKQK6uQ@mail.gmail.com> <702CB018-1A02-4B32-B9AA-7C7B31521F12@delong.com> <CAKD1Yr0jZR8Efzr_Y6FeiBvHYS8ATmDupx2ABTXXy-rSA_QjmA@mail.gmail.com> <1adb70a8-db0a-4ea6-f721-c1035343cda3@foobar.org> <DM6PR02MB69249D4F0A8003E77EC9F153C3B19@DM6PR02MB6924.namprd02.prod.outlook.com> <CAN-Dau0q7p-9NWv=9vouX51Z1Yqe_h06WwpnkMjkyj6=A7EcQw@mail.gmail.com> <DM6PR02MB692441075A30B10B3697E5F5C3B29@DM6PR02MB6924.namprd02.prod.outlook.com> <CAN-Dau0WP_4RsS65K3V4aFT8-DfxaCWTaGSuXytXeN=eWUuo7A@mail.gmail.com>
To: David Farmer <farmer=40umn.edu@dmarc.ietf.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3654.120.0.1.13)
X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.6.4 (owen.delong.com [192.159.10.2]); Fri, 08 Oct 2021 14:05:30 -0700 (PDT)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/AW00_fLMHmBDC41g2IhdLjfDM9g>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] Implementation Status of PREF64
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 Oct 2021 21:05:36 -0000

> And, you seem to be saying the makers of Android have no right to determine what protocols they will implement in their products.

I’m not sure if that’s Barbara’s intent or not… I will say this:

I think Google/Lorenzo/Android have every right to decide what to put in.

I’m not calling for an RFC that says they have to implement IA_NA.

I’m saying that they SHOULD implement it and that I would like it better if they DID implement it.

I am saying that their failure to implement it is an impediment to IPv6 adoption in the enterprise and some other environments.

Personally, I think that eventually people will simply decide “OK, android, no IPv6 for you, enjoy that CGN NAT4444444 world over
there or possibly this NAT46 environment here.”

But that eventuality will be put off for as long as possible and IPv6 in the enterprise will be procrastinated with it.

Owen

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email