IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] Please review the No IPv4 draft

Ted Lemon <ted.lemon@nominum.com> Wed, 30 April 2014 12:38 UTC

Return-Path: <Ted.Lemon@nominum.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B4B471A6F59 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 30 Apr 2014 05:38:56 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.551
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.551 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.651] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id dW5qSy84_UhM for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 30 Apr 2014 05:38:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from shell-too.nominum.com (shell-too.nominum.com [64.89.228.229]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D18BD1A0829 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Wed, 30 Apr 2014 05:38:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from archivist.nominum.com (archivist.nominum.com [64.89.228.108]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "*.nominum.com", Issuer "Go Daddy Secure Certification Authority" (verified OK)) by shell-too.nominum.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC13A1B8030 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Wed, 30 Apr 2014 05:38:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from webmail.nominum.com (cas-02.win.nominum.com [64.89.228.132]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "mail.nominum.com", Issuer "Go Daddy Secure Certification Authority" (verified OK)) by archivist.nominum.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A150119005C; Wed, 30 Apr 2014 05:38:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.0.10.40] (192.168.1.10) by CAS-02.WIN.NOMINUM.COM (192.168.1.101) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.158.1; Wed, 30 Apr 2014 05:38:48 -0700
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.2 \(1874\))
From: Ted Lemon <ted.lemon@nominum.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAKD1Yr24b8REXYaBjExcS83F0Lpo_SU0BPOmCfu+fBOuUERunA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2014 08:38:39 -0400
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-ID: <EB2BD1A7-94EF-439F-B771-1DE19F1D30FE@nominum.com>
References: <9B4139A3-77F7-4109-93AD-A822395E5007@nominum.com> <m2mwf59uht.wl%Niall.oReilly@ucd.ie> <7310412C-64E9-4A11-9812-92A969082131@nominum.com> <20140428190804.GK43641@Space.Net> <446A720E-1128-4FFF-BB3B-780EACA9610B@nominum.com> <535EBC20.10900@foobar.org> <20140428213045.GL511@havarti.local> <19B5B5AB-FF86-408B-8E73-D5350853965B@foobar.org> <3563D9EE-CD40-4E75-A1CB-C3FB50EEEBC4@nominum.com> <535F3624.4020801@foobar.org> <alpine.DEB.2.02.1404290726011.29282@uplift.swm.pp.se> <535F3A8C.2050902@foobar.org> <E68028C1-2E6D-4D07-A113-60757457E286@nominum.com> <535F99A9.3030402@foobar.org> <0C03200E-B349-44D4-BE3F-512AD6A7A417@nominum.com> <535FCB2C.3030502@foobar.org> <8DB83B3D-D09C-4977-9B4F-75EA2DD3B71D@nominum.com> <53601BED.4050200@foobar.org> <37DC9152-EEE3-4EEF-81C7-AD5B6D0E9892@nominum.com> <536033DD.8020800@foobar.org> <alpine.DEB.2.02.1404300607110.29282@uplift.swm.pp.se> <CAKD1Yr3o1vEzCQz086KZzUemmsYopDHijZbXivW1+bCGPcPpiQ@mail.gmail.com> <5360AA69.1050400@gont.com.ar> <CAKD1Yr24b8REXYaBjExcS83F0Lpo_SU0BPOmCfu+fBOuUERunA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@google.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1874)
X-Originating-IP: [192.168.1.10]
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/AkxdImLvs9IIp4XYumgMsuSTDF4
Cc: "v6ops@ietf.org WG" <v6ops@ietf.org>, Fernando Gont <fernando@gont.com.ar>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] Please review the No IPv4 draft
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2014 12:38:56 -0000

On Apr 30, 2014, at 4:32 AM, Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@google.com> wrote:
> Hence the words "to some degree". And really it depends on the HE implementation. If it also races DNS queries and treats IPv4 and IPv6 like ships in the night (i.e., tries all provisioning information from IPv4 consistently, and indipendently from all IPv6 provisioning information), and if it over time blacklists source addresses or protocols that don't work (like the Windows 8 implementation), then it won't be affected.

Hm, this is a good argument for treating IPv4 and IPv6 as separate provisioning domains in MIF.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email