IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] SLAAC renum: Problem Statement & Operational workarounds

Timothy Winters <twinters@iol.unh.edu> Wed, 30 October 2019 12:40 UTC

Return-Path: <twinters@iol.unh.edu>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA78D12013D for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 30 Oct 2019 05:40:52 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.998
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.998 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=iol.unh.edu
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id aJd0Seu2Npg6 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 30 Oct 2019 05:40:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wr1-x42e.google.com (mail-wr1-x42e.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::42e]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CA78B12010C for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Wed, 30 Oct 2019 05:40:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wr1-x42e.google.com with SMTP id l10so2148509wrb.2 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Wed, 30 Oct 2019 05:40:50 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=iol.unh.edu; s=unh-iol; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=zuKYTxFnNgJUMco8T2gYHf3rjgSzfgVSs98QmUnbWfo=; b=cfY20c0dFUO/XhuKslL0ydtfyBHTITjowUi705DQNE3FG7HR5pwBKzS/LWxP0KbXuh X/mM2hs9gG6mCTwiGkLERonry+nXKYFWCmTYhirMDH4mrRDkd8UqndgGUI0wX6MKRstJ wJGDj5ZEJlK7/KWQqZEAAzcnKBp48IIyMOxkE=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=zuKYTxFnNgJUMco8T2gYHf3rjgSzfgVSs98QmUnbWfo=; b=JgHV1NpPbOHov9ViG5/aImTxsmC4NQgS3GzVz2yxx5FBIvLdSYXJxnyGT+4ZbPK9A7 jU5M+fRenPgsA9cGnyTUTGkdSGPm9QMjUmvpXtpCjrrSd1Z/MXxecqtwtG+H5W3y/lL6 iOr42e1qC06S1zzqrSSixf/dL+IrBnbeLKf9cnMyuLKUEMLeAT8GwUgKj3H81fQa+8aD c/KHZq/NWpL2EB8+j/bjkCauVMKkqn0B41li2aoshnwxmHZUO1+QGhsG6+FB+AqYgqV7 MvK/Egl78btheoPTju3VEoxaYvbI7eVHsqeFJbyx4tzERWyVJaLPCm8FegFChRPvElNY HH4Q==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAVSPVbXslpb/IG7Y1suzv1BbG7aT9mEEhaPQdRZhZyVuRuQAnN/ 2eAqSPhU3/jQDI4mKuTn0RZsqlSe2OKjXkyhoEfE0w==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqyOv74fnYuFMVr6/5sJKz6/iUCrAmaub+uAhAafFdkEY3KqqDEIcnKBdpV0Z6Wx/vlHiTLDckPnajT0uClXHsU=
X-Received: by 2002:adf:f00d:: with SMTP id j13mr23071623wro.253.1572439249175; Wed, 30 Oct 2019 05:40:49 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAOSSMjVhK_V4HpMzprOyo9pj=ysFef+uZUs=twd_zfPaBdPu3Q@mail.gmail.com> <0F0B6068-CA62-449B-B56E-78E9EF8D998E@fugue.com>
In-Reply-To: <0F0B6068-CA62-449B-B56E-78E9EF8D998E@fugue.com>
From: Timothy Winters <twinters@iol.unh.edu>
Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2019 08:40:38 -0400
Message-ID: <CAOSSMjVLP4dx0Z1OKgXBgmuUCmR_C35J87fgkX7V=e7E3iQY3w@mail.gmail.com>
To: Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com>
Cc: Nick Hilliard <nick@foobar.org>, IPv6 Operations <v6ops@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000e0e4330596200a85"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/Az9f9QOQZZZIhqxE2kcsG4Zt3sY>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] SLAAC renum: Problem Statement & Operational workarounds
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2019 12:40:53 -0000

Hi Ted,

We check both, the handling of the IA_PD and the error message.

~Tim

On Wed, Oct 30, 2019 at 8:33 AM Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com> wrote:

> On Oct 30, 2019, at 08:30, Timothy Winters <twinters@iol.unh.edu> wrote:
> > Yes we have a couple of test cases for IPv6 Ready CE Router Logo that
> confirms this behavior.  One focuses on "Prefix Change" or what your
> calling Flash renumber.  I will note this is a common failure the first
> time devices fail.
>
> Thanks for the info!  Which behavior do you mean?  There’s the handling of
> pd, and then there’s the icmp response.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email