Re: [v6ops] new draft: draft-taylor-v6ops-fragdrop

Mark Andrews <marka@isc.org> Mon, 05 November 2012 00:00 UTC

Return-Path: <marka@isc.org>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EDB6321F87A6 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 4 Nov 2012 16:00:23 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id g0VuvFp51fI4 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 4 Nov 2012 16:00:23 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx.pao1.isc.org (mx.pao1.isc.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:0:2::2b]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3787921F860D for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Sun, 4 Nov 2012 16:00:23 -0800 (PST)
Received: from bikeshed.isc.org (bikeshed.isc.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:3:d::19]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mail.isc.org", Issuer "RapidSSL CA" (not verified)) by mx.pao1.isc.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 378FCCA112; Mon, 5 Nov 2012 00:00:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from marka@isc.org)
Received: from drugs.dv.isc.org (unknown [IPv6:2001:470:1f00:820:d4fd:9b72:542a:8949]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by bikeshed.isc.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id EC28F216C85; Mon, 5 Nov 2012 00:00:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from marka@isc.org)
Received: from drugs.dv.isc.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by drugs.dv.isc.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A56232ACCA52; Mon, 5 Nov 2012 11:00:15 +1100 (EST)
To: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
From: Mark Andrews <marka@isc.org>
References: <CAKD1Yr13cNspdWvTaXxHt4R_8UB-CKeA4nq8_XWrkbFGCgW7Gg@mail.gmail.com> <5090DECF.3050100@gmail.com> <CAKD1Yr1dUy-f78A2+kfA7NjpzD0WQRT8iwqGYAm5A=Erodpn-A@mail.gmail.com> <20121031.122110.41655699.sthaug@nethelp.no> <50910E41.2030100@gmail.com> <CAKD1Yr0mTTcVeq+Qf0fLv3UCBP_90QmStkK3Ha4tDdm3FxJjVA@mail.gmail.com> <50915F86.7050304@gmail.com> <509165B8.404@si6networks.com> <509169C2.9040208@isi.edu> <50916F21.6030303@si6networks.com> <509174F1.8080809@isi.edu> <50924264.7040300@gmail.com> <76E349F3-6022-4042-9B44-57507593B8DE@employees.org> <5094269F.3000705@bogus.com> <5094C9E7.4030306@gmail.com> <m2hap6zvv6.wl%randy@psg.com> <5095BC0F.80301@gmail.com> <m2sj8qxk16.wl%randy@psg.com>
In-reply-to: Your message of "Sun, 04 Nov 2012 09:56:53 +0900." <m2sj8qxk16.wl%randy@psg.com>
Date: Mon, 05 Nov 2012 11:00:15 +1100
Message-Id: <20121105000015.A56232ACCA52@drugs.dv.isc.org>
Cc: Fernando Gont <fgont@si6networks.com>, v6ops@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [v6ops] new draft: draft-taylor-v6ops-fragdrop
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/v6ops>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 05 Nov 2012 00:00:24 -0000

While flow labels work for distributing traffic, they do not work
for filtering as there is guarentee that fragments will arrive in
order.  For filtering their need a copy of the headers routers are
using to filter to be available in all of the fragments.  At a
minimum this is the UDP header.  TCP should be able to be handled
with PTB being returned on fragmented packets.  I havn't thought
about other protocols.

-- 
Mark Andrews, ISC
1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia
PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742                 INTERNET: marka@isc.org