IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] I-D Action: draft-ietf-v6ops-ipv6rtr-reqs-02.txt

Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@google.com> Mon, 05 March 2018 07:56 UTC

Return-Path: <lorenzo@google.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E9D87126BF0 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 4 Mar 2018 23:56:56 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.709
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.709 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=google.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ELlVKGnH0sUh for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 4 Mar 2018 23:56:55 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-wm0-x229.google.com (mail-wm0-x229.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c09::229]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0A69D126579 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Sun, 4 Mar 2018 23:56:55 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-wm0-x229.google.com with SMTP id 139so13578113wmn.2 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Sun, 04 Mar 2018 23:56:54 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=xMCDhTbbgZt7rTu29OusYwS+CMSA6LKar8N+bJRov3o=; b=Vc3RIAlp3WnfpnDC9DTk1T0P5Xeg7dbKtxZYRTMqAqgIx1+1n9QdTEwcaIRyVmz1Qn mJYHg2tgWR5bC2ARYMUChIH7sMZVOIi7ydrHx1t8c0ePtXArqWMc379VCVglK+11ds8Q /HYR8yRkv2MwSVO6q08ZYdRyFF8bRBTRHR/b0GwvghS1myrRS0CxyKad/iVuswRzTRMw 39aZvZlZkzIo8gRo5tthjuLFz+n4hN5gofV+qEqJKb34bbbNAPaayIyDGWlihykEUeJz oqHiheoo3MlkVIDaOl11VeXPEc0XhDoI+GenQBSat6NM9O9lpfpI1O8QAQ8RGY3QB95O 9C1A==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=xMCDhTbbgZt7rTu29OusYwS+CMSA6LKar8N+bJRov3o=; b=LeAHoRGIPDTy2VoXLmVRCrxRilqO36pIlgAWLr8/UfIYeK9Aw4ssJ/xcd2Wd2Q0/ut qwlj3edThz6dRcttHUK6SdI8YwIjwtXVLQ4gcoNFO2CNvBjCJBIxTgd7Ahq4x8S07ddj XBQjQaFxh3/pQu6bsKlmZu3kjiOpm/4V890jt+hqsew0KUqiFIiTb6tCL0RkdBnZNHH8 6c1daK22lY4CGf/598TmoUcuiqarsvkcDBN6CI4S0hoSt0h5AISfBMEWALJqnzt7h8Bh qrYTOauswg5UZq+mxOJ4eicss1Tv49Zat3LhY+lm71Ngphd8qc5XQNGTJhWomiyBemnL OutA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AElRT7FkNINqiLYz3gWxvJ3A08SA983NgjjEEnb5msVvZpBFqJDeBfan f9oekGQKQnA9nYE9tatIkgvFWOyomOMiEGoNcHUrRI8O
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AG47ELu2w9kos80Pb7x2z9sEZxICIkXRqrUkpJ29FtkUQaQOuwY2tsIMkRIySV1CDXjcGrvHUG5FwPDfQNBuadJQflo=
X-Received: by 10.28.172.202 with SMTP id v193mr6849376wme.129.1520236613177; Sun, 04 Mar 2018 23:56:53 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.28.63.79 with HTTP; Sun, 4 Mar 2018 23:56:32 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <9E282363-869B-49D5-AD90-B7AA38EAF606@isc.org>
References: <152021615239.27925.6946415833371012617@ietfa.amsl.com> <CAKD1Yr00qjz7z8VF5=WeZ+baBPxJfmnYVhvNqKn_m7gu9H2GTA@mail.gmail.com> <0E0957B6-FA65-4CB0-965F-832699118204@isc.org> <CAKD1Yr3eLjO4vdQLjJgi2M=kyO_P9Mpw99ctY06GbzPFZZ6V5g@mail.gmail.com> <9C6ADA3B-8EC8-4E30-94C9-36285A9FFCCA@isc.org> <CAKD1Yr1u8Ph5+Pr52YO6nf6qxEDXZmS=-1-aUwUzVK1M_iB26g@mail.gmail.com> <02EF1B15-1344-4316-8F96-3105D82F4E4D@isc.org> <20180305084214.6389aec9@echo.ms.redpill-linpro.com> <9E282363-869B-49D5-AD90-B7AA38EAF606@isc.org>
From: Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@google.com>
Date: Mon, 05 Mar 2018 16:56:32 +0900
Message-ID: <CAKD1Yr2NzGQP3YL=Uf3aoRHRVB1Z6GWjC21v98pPEU9JjsKfqQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Mark Andrews <marka@isc.org>
Cc: Tore Anderson <tore@fud.no>, "v6ops@ietf.org WG" <v6ops@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a1141f2244e37cb0566a5abd7"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/BJ3ZKc9k5CjEuDLdikMaqr8BnvY>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] I-D Action: draft-ietf-v6ops-ipv6rtr-reqs-02.txt
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 05 Mar 2018 07:56:57 -0000

On Mon, Mar 5, 2018 at 4:55 PM, Mark Andrews <marka@isc.org> wrote:

> > You're forgetting that the network could be torn down for all sorts of
> > reasons outside the phone's control, like driving through a tunnel.
> > When you emerge from the tunnel 10 seconds later, the phone might
> > receive a new /64.
>
> So?  The existing /64 is STILL valid. You just have 2 prefixes.
>

No you don't, the network is free to assign the old one to someone else.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email