IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] draft-lmhp-v6ops-transition-comparison

Yannis Nikolopoulos <yanodd@otenet.gr> Sat, 01 June 2019 10:06 UTC

Return-Path: <yanodd@otenet.gr>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 83E7D120254 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 1 Jun 2019 03:06:07 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.898
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.898 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id OvtBhnZqnG-P for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 1 Jun 2019 03:06:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from calypso.otenet.gr (calypso.otenet.gr [83.235.67.36]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E7FC6120247 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Sat, 1 Jun 2019 03:06:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.7] (ppp-2-86-144-160.home.otenet.gr [2.86.144.160]) by calypso.otenet.gr (ESMTP) with ESMTPA id 857FA13803D; Sat, 1 Jun 2019 13:06:00 +0300 (EEST)
To: Gábor Lencse <lencse@hit.bme.hu>, v6ops@ietf.org
References: <BYAPR05MB424560402C84199F4D131E43AE390@BYAPR05MB4245.namprd05.prod.outlook.com> <FE63840C-96F8-4EC6-BF1F-1182530D6F2B@gmail.com> <77004251-b478-696d-8e7b-a1f460a88c9e@hit.bme.hu>
From: Yannis Nikolopoulos <yanodd@otenet.gr>
Message-ID: <40b2e0c7-84b6-bd9b-45ba-08dafd14d7b7@otenet.gr>
Date: Sat, 01 Jun 2019 13:06:00 +0300
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.6.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <77004251-b478-696d-8e7b-a1f460a88c9e@hit.bme.hu>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------CCBC47C84DC85F7698D92ABE"
Content-Language: en-US
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/BjLcrq_CXptg-dSRgsrWjMI_G7A>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] draft-lmhp-v6ops-transition-comparison
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 01 Jun 2019 10:06:07 -0000

Hello,

I'll just re-iterate what I thought about this in the past. I do find it 
useful in principle, but it does not yet feel like a comparison document 
that operators can use as reference. Having said that, I do support its 
adoption and would like to see a new version

regards,
Yannis

On 5/3/19 12:26 PM, Gábor Lencse wrote:
>
> Dear v6ops Members,
>
> Yes, as Fread wrote, we would like our draft be adopted by the WG.
>
> IMHO, RFC 6180 covers a much wider topic than our I-D, thus I 
> recommend that our I-D should only update it (and not obsolete it).
>
> It seemed to me from the minutes ( 
> https://tools.ietf.org/wg/v6ops/minutes?item=minutes-104-v6ops-00.html 
> ) that several people considered our draft useful.
>
> Please, react now: Do you consider it useful and support its adoption 
> as a WG item?
>
> What do you think is missing from it? Which direction should we go?
>
> Are there any questionable statements? Anything, which is biased?
>
> Best regards,
>
> Gábor
>
>
> On 4/30/2019 11:03, Fred Baker wrote:
>> At least part of the question is that the authors would like this to be a working group draft. I'm interested to know what the working group thinks of it. It started out as an essentially academic paper, and would update or obsolete RFC 6180.
>>
>>> On Apr 29, 2019, at 10:32 AM, Ron Bonica<rbonica=40juniper.net@dmarc.ietf.org>  wrote:
>>>
>>> Folks,
>>>
>>> Each week between now and IETF 105, we will review and discuss one draft with an eye towards progressing it.
>>>
>>> This week, please review and comment on draft-lmhp-v6ops-transition-comparison.
>>>
>>>                                                              Fred and Ron
>>>
>>> Non-Juniper
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> v6ops mailing list
>>> v6ops@ietf.org
>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> v6ops mailing list
>> v6ops@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops
>
> _______________________________________________
> v6ops mailing list
> v6ops@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email