IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] Incremental Deployment of IPv6-only Wi-Fi for IETF Meetings

Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com> Mon, 17 July 2017 06:53 UTC

Return-Path: <mellon@fugue.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3DDF6131675 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 16 Jul 2017 23:53:56 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=fugue-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id O056SbBkvHFf for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 16 Jul 2017 23:53:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pg0-x231.google.com (mail-pg0-x231.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c05::231]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 244A11315FE for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Sun, 16 Jul 2017 23:53:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pg0-x231.google.com with SMTP id u5so12273358pgq.3 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Sun, 16 Jul 2017 23:53:54 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=fugue-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=VniFOava8NjEYw1Bw6Ce+H6MqF5azUG6EjaLoa/4Xyw=; b=YV9wjQvawwaBjeYH6+Pd+qTv6PoXC02SilgkrpwAuzPrA1bOj8MbWdicokw7JZJ08X 3g/fUFof0pX9LxNm1pKH3MpVbXwPv+Lp4J9ePk2mD/QcBunzhZunOkGmYZdiO1q+W8Ry mOoZDzpaHwmLlP9pjqSigczSK07EblQC5aIwzp+oiTUoH0XO229C4oV19q0WmevdYJZs F+/FoDQkHeqpPzfsHSQQXlXJoIJniApI8Ob1unq/E9XFcFCmpckaPaVpCqyzwbuMfjde am7ZBxFEhurrUF2IrhJAgJgN+QxOVGxxGfyljqr8MM8I1kNbs4XmBHjJA5jo8DNOER5F St/A==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=VniFOava8NjEYw1Bw6Ce+H6MqF5azUG6EjaLoa/4Xyw=; b=mI4eaNPkh9SjFDBarP02ZzD7z/s9fA+9rSxWP+1tVR6E7/guxuPMVGMU2rfMycL5/e qmMP/OqliSaaIwVRRIvzJ2GrjrYNxmR4Ot8CIaOIi4xIUEhxjf5DilP7piWV5EA8BomD /F3v8NfMd/ZWUIjwPoNYN68QTzcSny36CU/9uhIGLZ4rdN6eC9QbMuD5wF+VSfRgwtwz CRBqz2kLYJcqr7cmfsDH0OpP9teTQBBk1K9XBb0bOuQr5FJG8TMDc8c2jUqXZKcHkiNO u3O4C+SubvjTlqGiBlq7p5TEFYe7V+QWZvM5XsRsHjGAZwEfoOczI8jLE/TsRQfYd2DK vkhQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AIVw110EYVD6Ps91Z+cYkgV9LwjWTaTh6ArjAl21rYq0wIQsiUOlvrDN /T10e6iUOiLjkZflXEVtUesO8EiMgQ/7
X-Received: by 10.98.193.68 with SMTP id i65mr3109780pfg.142.1500274433660; Sun, 16 Jul 2017 23:53:53 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.100.181.42 with HTTP; Sun, 16 Jul 2017 23:53:13 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <9AF791E9-1E12-425E-93A4-2913E2D18CBA@consulintel.es>
References: <7643C1DC-76A3-4652-9BB1-D0D42801F37E@consulintel.es> <CAEqgTWYOe=jWp=zVZNLx6DjKjNpPTYaq2jmjryudrGZHKZNq6g@mail.gmail.com> <A5D0385C-F755-4B44-86D8-6E618E77193F@consulintel.es> <CAPt1N1kroh2cPkTr8HRfNjLTdG0hkC1oQsUZdhQzQA5tA9-xug@mail.gmail.com> <9AF791E9-1E12-425E-93A4-2913E2D18CBA@consulintel.es>
From: Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2017 08:53:13 +0200
Message-ID: <CAPt1N1kU4cpVCsp7W3XNAZupYqjTWVH+BNp9bwtznnWD_uP2oQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: JORDI PALET MARTINEZ <jordi.palet@consulintel.es>
Cc: IPv6 Ops WG <v6ops@ietf.org>, Jim Martin <jim@daedelus.com>, Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>, Suresh Krishnan <suresh.krishnan@gmail.com>, Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>, Alissa Cooper <alissa@cooperw.in>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="94eb2c184720b1198a05547ddcc3"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/BjVAyfSLNXKGYe7nAHLIsA7s3R0>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] Incremental Deployment of IPv6-only Wi-Fi for IETF Meetings
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2017 06:53:56 -0000

I don't think this is a social justice issue.   Does the IETF think that
IPv6 works, or not?   If we think it works, and we have been working for
what, 20 years, to make it work, and we have designed all this great
transition tech, then why on earth would we not want to use it?   This
isn't "one draft."   This is roughly half the work of the IETF for the past
two decades.

On Mon, Jul 17, 2017 at 8:51 AM, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ <
jordi.palet@consulintel.es> wrote:

> So we agree to change the rules so that we use this network for every ID
> that want to experiment with it? Otherwise we discriminate among different
> authors …
>
> I think is a really bad precedent.
>
> Regards,
> Jordi
>
>
> -----Mensaje original-----
> De: Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com>
> Responder a: <mellon@fugue.com>
> Fecha: lunes, 17 de julio de 2017, 8:48
> Para: JORDI PALET MARTINEZ <jordi.palet@consulintel.es>
> CC: IPv6 Ops WG <v6ops@ietf.org>, Jim Martin <jim@daedelus.com>, Randy
> Bush <randy@psg.com>, Suresh Krishnan <suresh.krishnan@gmail.com>, Russ
> Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>, Alissa Cooper <alissa@cooperw.in>
> Asunto: Re: [v6ops] Incremental Deployment of IPv6-only Wi-Fi for IETF
> Meetings
>
>     I don't actually know what the goal of the IETF network is other than
> to provide connectivity.   Because of the vicissitudes of hotel topology,
> it is often the case that IETF participants experience issues with the
> network at least once or twice per IETF despite the best efforts (and they
> are quite exceptional) of the NOC team.   I do not really see what the
> damage is that you are hoping to protect against here.   Users who don't
> read the NOC announcement?   No sympathy.   Sorry.
>
>
>
>
>
> **********************************************
> IPv4 is over
> Are you ready for the new Internet ?
> http://www.consulintel.es
> The IPv6 Company
>
> This electronic message contains information which may be privileged or
> confidential. The information is intended to be for the use of the
> individual(s) named above. If you are not the intended recipient be aware
> that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this
> information, including attached files, is prohibited.
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> v6ops mailing list
> v6ops@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email