Re: [v6ops] Discussion: IPv4 as a Service
"Fred Baker (fred)" <fred@cisco.com> Mon, 30 March 2015 19:54 UTC
Return-Path: <fred@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E54D11A86FD; Mon, 30 Mar 2015 12:54:27 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -112.612
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-112.612 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_40=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Ch-3xM2PlS11; Mon, 30 Mar 2015 12:54:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from alln-iport-5.cisco.com (alln-iport-5.cisco.com [173.37.142.92]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DDD371A1BCB; Mon, 30 Mar 2015 12:54:25 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=1710; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1427745265; x=1428954865; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:references:in-reply-to: mime-version; bh=1jm2BvX4d0eY2LYL2841Np+19uuE0kAoa4Hy+7ZdZF8=; b=EVOaZbS+DQZjMEcCmKRiPTkdmYKp9yPYPqhFT0XP49G1goL3ofugyURU XFiqnRmQtqiqhybGExSXvDDQ+fchdjmwWPAY2uJUZI6GsYY4mj6WSagQv o6Y9bHugM8CK7P3zqG7O7inLh6AR5jvxU1w1nzabqmMEJXdXPCXf/D97X k=;
X-Files: signature.asc : 487
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0AtBQB4qRlV/5ldJa1cgwZSYIMPwi+FcQKBOkwBAQEBAQF9hBUBAQMBI1sLAgEIQgICMiUCBAEgiBkIDbJumQIBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQETBIsphH+CaC+BFgWQXIFrgTJUhgOUNSKDboIzfwEBAQ
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.11,496,1422921600"; d="asc'?scan'208";a="136736739"
Received: from rcdn-core-2.cisco.com ([173.37.93.153]) by alln-iport-5.cisco.com with ESMTP; 30 Mar 2015 19:54:17 +0000
Received: from xhc-aln-x03.cisco.com (xhc-aln-x03.cisco.com [173.36.12.77]) by rcdn-core-2.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id t2UJsHVh009122 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Mon, 30 Mar 2015 19:54:17 GMT
Received: from xmb-rcd-x09.cisco.com ([169.254.9.131]) by xhc-aln-x03.cisco.com ([173.36.12.77]) with mapi id 14.03.0195.001; Mon, 30 Mar 2015 14:54:17 -0500
From: "Fred Baker (fred)" <fred@cisco.com>
To: IPv6 Ops WG <v6ops@ietf.org>, "sunset4@ietf.org" <sunset4@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [v6ops] Discussion: IPv4 as a Service
Thread-Index: AQHQayNOg4kWwf156ESqrMiINuhM1g==
Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2015 19:54:16 +0000
Message-ID: <95C21895-305F-46BD-A571-925FBD838EEA@cisco.com>
References: <D2204E54-FD09-40E1-A3BE-A662C4546E0D@cisco.com> <8EF27210-0C56-4F6D-81FD-B27EE34ED444@cisco.com> <CAHDzDLBNJVNL4B3R0HvWWTZ=P0kJihKrjRzkDN07LPV_t_QnLw@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAHDzDLBNJVNL4B3R0HvWWTZ=P0kJihKrjRzkDN07LPV_t_QnLw@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach: yes
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.19.64.117]
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_81BE3B01-FFB9-451F-A0E9-7AA9AD1F702A"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha1"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/BxXbJb3YZrUEBw-KjuPbdgWX3gU>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] Discussion: IPv4 as a Service
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2015 19:54:28 -0000
Over the weekend, we crowd-sourced a number of pretty good questions. I took the liberty, this morning, of reorganizing the text a bit. The "list of technologies" and "list of questions" remain, but I have added "possible (classes of) documents to be developed" and a first cut at a proposed outline, with the questions from above pulled in to make it clear what I might hope the section might comment on. Collecting comments and thoughts. I guarantee there is something we haven’t thought of (as I was reorganizing, several points popped out, and I’m sure I’m not that smart). > https://docs.google.com/document/d/1ifDEkoypW43lgZJqh2paUDcMAwoUWdz6psyEb456c3A/edit?usp=sharing
- [v6ops] Discussion: IPv4 as a Service Fred Baker
- Re: [v6ops] Discussion: IPv4 as a Service Fred Baker (fred)
- Re: [v6ops] Discussion: IPv4 as a Service Mukom Akong T.
- Re: [v6ops] Discussion: IPv4 as a Service Fred Baker (fred)
- Re: [v6ops] Discussion: IPv4 as a Service Fred Baker (fred)
- Re: [v6ops] Discussion: IPv4 as a Service Edwin Cordeiro