IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] Flash renumbering

Gyan Mishra <hayabusagsm@gmail.com> Sat, 19 September 2020 02:29 UTC

Return-Path: <hayabusagsm@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 449C73A11B7 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 18 Sep 2020 19:29:58 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.086
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.086 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_32=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_REMOTE_IMAGE=0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Pd1H0VXPekjl for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 18 Sep 2020 19:29:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-vk1-xa2f.google.com (mail-vk1-xa2f.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::a2f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5F80B3A11B5 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Fri, 18 Sep 2020 19:29:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-vk1-xa2f.google.com with SMTP id m8so1926247vka.6 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Fri, 18 Sep 2020 19:29:56 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=M8LhVk+747vA8A/mCbyWJBi2fCy/iwjVbaRpjAeS+kE=; b=IFCooGas7FDULCQYLiylmLCVIRyqNtr2LW+8HWCWxoD+avPutxM5fgMbUuVryFYS3U GUd3MaMN4ZVVljcOKZIk3HeGHAywKPk5erc/Foj6i/jThVeuHz/Xx0GsEvmCybjTT0mT Yf2IebmUi72xLbgHTq7RLE/PADXsgnH1OMqBXEQ2WMa7zgveugNM7gdtN+VVzpXTRsit 8lrau4kzRTlByluSMtN1AGWz8pU694ZLbCr+YwiMyFK0Kz3/NxX9IIoKCq5Jt6K71GgS u6BMQhvhZucfviEiesCkxFNRrIkQ3FDN6VLUj3GCJJbGI1NNfzCvlmkuAlSsGIONfv+f JKbA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=M8LhVk+747vA8A/mCbyWJBi2fCy/iwjVbaRpjAeS+kE=; b=QQnJSjZlMiRSYxvcP6IhF5sWGxBUXT3AuRBOV0l/DLpfV0WWYuuj3XrkIt1Y7gmpiO zCbxitoQE6cth+hEj8GbNIqc4WK5UFk81GiHps0GTRZzCF1eA/b59aq74g72/nvlKKcZ h29o0C8dZKdXzTDTYRbfEzqDLqbYYRSjqUq9wpT1/ADNgDtorcjaOTIICH7pl8+kPFXm kOKE1wKgXF0hMRrfzduvz9ijuaL6XuzoGXmZwf6lhas0V3Casc4Ybuxat2Ow8TK0CD1u psH2RbWkVgi8qZvtzIjOBsFPswGOwylFE2aHFpqHROkZwC171DWSMGld66k8tD0WfqNn j4zQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533oIWa2+nxuVhhInj8xPZCivRpdCnGCzZjYQFA7TadayC/c25fv Yd0XaQBIu6NdB46Fvd+s+QOMUkVBU89p6Uo3OaM=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJw3fC8iUupSFDpQE/Qu/xbrC/oIafuH1uBhGF/nN/fk1GmziNwrh98oL4sZfH56IHxmBEEjijKUCPvKwBmzZwg=
X-Received: by 2002:a1f:a551:: with SMTP id o78mr13461585vke.25.1600482595193; Fri, 18 Sep 2020 19:29:55 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <f0d9ce6b-f917-cd3c-cd0d-e460d175ee6c@gmail.com> <1A960746-3BF4-4238-B314-1CA9198D452D@employees.org> <12138548-b098-15c6-fc6e-8518bdae6e90@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <12138548-b098-15c6-fc6e-8518bdae6e90@gmail.com>
From: Gyan Mishra <hayabusagsm@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2020 22:29:44 -0400
Message-ID: <CABNhwV2r14wr7o2_0rOgvJSZHYj0ALaafZn94ud24+Vt_emThQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
Cc: Ole Troan <otroan@employees.org>, Richard Patterson <richard@helix.net.nz>, v6ops@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000008e4e0905afa1643d"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/C1ViZkIlyVu0esxIQFqNgdpWbk0>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] Flash renumbering
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 19 Sep 2020 02:29:58 -0000

The whole issue with flash renumbering is related to PD.  Instead of
changing SLAAC to react better to flash renumbering event could we just
make PD sticky so it keeps your last prefix doled out similar to DHCPv4
where you get your last leased prefix.

Is that possible?

On Fri, Sep 18, 2020 at 10:13 PM Brian E Carpenter <
brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> wrote:

> On 19-Sep-20 09:21, Ole Troan wrote:
>
> >
>
> >
>
> >> On 18 Sep 2020, at 22:57, Brian E Carpenter <
> brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >>
>
> >> On 19-Sep-20 05:11, Gyan Mishra wrote:
>
> >>>
>
> >>> All
>
> >>>
>
> >>> I really still feel this use case being Broadband provider PD related
> stale prefix issue  is really a corner case for SOHO users
>
> >>
>
> >> Why is that a "corner case"? We can count SOHO networks by the hundreds
> of millions, compared with enterprise networks in millions. They both
> matter, but SOHOs are about two orders of magnitude greater in number.
>
> >
>
> > Corner case because Service Providers generally do not flash renumber
> their customers.
>
>
>
> Can you put a percentage on that? Where I live, they do, whenever there's
> a glitch on the local loop, even if the local loop is made of glass.
>
>
>
>     Brian
>
>
>
> --

<http://www.verizon.com/>

*Gyan Mishra*

*Network Solutions A**rchitect *



*M 301 502-134713101 Columbia Pike *Silver Spring, MD

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email