IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] State of play

"Fred Baker (fred)" <fred@cisco.com> Mon, 04 January 2016 18:33 UTC

Return-Path: <fred@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7641E1A038C for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 4 Jan 2016 10:33:12 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -114.511
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-114.511 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xQzvrnkMa-4V for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 4 Jan 2016 10:33:10 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rcdn-iport-9.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-9.cisco.com [173.37.86.80]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B3C231A0404 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Mon, 4 Jan 2016 10:33:04 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=4555; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1451932384; x=1453141984; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:mime-version; bh=WnzBZtBGCqOTJ0CH2S/Zjegp6xDoejYB/ZR4DT8P9vw=; b=geGs5cpRjoMEbTViLLSmC3GwQT681Ge5TsJX4IGUHtA0tkJ9HGHx1voT Tan9JGAqaW5f9dglxigGoLrD9pQmsjwN4AkRrgMp34O+WkDeE1rlnR/1T s6p9MsiXJ9hUGkQPww+SxH83w3fOLCHd+N+0ZZo5sr7CFe6yrV2K5ynpk A=;
X-Files: signature.asc : 833
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0DsAgC4uYpW/5BdJa1bA4M6Um0GiFOzdg6BZBgKhW0CgRw4FAEBAQEBAQGBCoQ0AQEBAwEBAQFrCwUHBAIBCBEDAQIBLicLHQgCBA4FDogZCA7BNQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQ8FBIhlCIJohCYRASUaASaDA4EbBY05iU0BgnGBZIh7gVyNH4VYhG+DcgEgAUOECnKDTjqBCAEBAQ
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.20,521,1444694400"; d="asc'?scan'208";a="58378607"
Received: from rcdn-core-8.cisco.com ([173.37.93.144]) by rcdn-iport-9.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 04 Jan 2016 18:33:03 +0000
Received: from XCH-RCD-011.cisco.com (xch-rcd-011.cisco.com [173.37.102.21]) by rcdn-core-8.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id u04IX3i1000500 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Mon, 4 Jan 2016 18:33:03 GMT
Received: from xch-rcd-013.cisco.com (173.37.102.23) by XCH-RCD-011.cisco.com (173.37.102.21) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1104.5; Mon, 4 Jan 2016 12:33:02 -0600
Received: from xch-rcd-013.cisco.com ([173.37.102.23]) by XCH-RCD-013.cisco.com ([173.37.102.23]) with mapi id 15.00.1104.009; Mon, 4 Jan 2016 12:33:02 -0600
From: "Fred Baker (fred)" <fred@cisco.com>
To: John Brzozowski <John_Brzozowski@Cable.Comcast.com>
Thread-Topic: [v6ops] State of play
Thread-Index: AQHRRx5YDRz6JMpP006tIIZ8oTK66g==
Date: Mon, 04 Jan 2016 18:33:02 +0000
Message-ID: <0494FE57-71F1-4117-98F3-4BF96032D3D2@cisco.com>
References: <201601011400.u01E0BqP025288@irp-lnx1.cisco.com> <D2AF685F.1B67C2%john_brzozowski@cable.comcast.com>
In-Reply-To: <D2AF685F.1B67C2%john_brzozowski@cable.comcast.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach: yes
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-mailer: Apple Mail (2.3112)
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [10.19.64.124]
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_B69A0DE3-D81C-4CC0-921B-E7C80DEA7CF6"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha1"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/C1eFPNFsgxE5DSKuK4glszQkmCM>
Cc: "v6ops@ietf.org" <v6ops@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] State of play
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Jan 2016 18:33:12 -0000

No problem. When you next submit an update for draft-ietf-v6ops-unique-ipv6-prefix-per-host, the tool will ask you whether it replaces any existing drafts. If you say "yes, it replaces draft-jjmb-v6ops-unique-ipv6-prefix-per-host", the individual submission will drop out of the list the IETF tools give me.

There is another option, though. On the list, you discussed excising some Comcast-specific elements from The WG draft, making that draft be entirely about the generalized type of service (which seems like a good idea). One option would be to keep the Comcast-specific parts in draft-jjmb-v6ops-unique-ipv6-prefix-per-host, which continues to exist. Another obvious option would be to file those under a new draft name, in which case I would argue that the WG draft replaces the individual one.

Your call. Either way works for me.

> On Jan 3, 2016, at 9:09 PM, Brzozowski, John <John_Brzozowski@Cable.Comcast.com> wrote:
> 
> Fred,
> 
> Just to be clear, the following:
> 
> 2015-10-19	draft-jjmb-v6ops-unique-ipv6-prefix-per-host
> 
> Will no longer be updated since it was accepted as a WG document:
> 
> 2015-11-01	draft-ietf-v6ops-unique-ipv6-prefix-per-host
> 
> We plan to make updates based on the last WG meeting and email comments
> for the next IETF.
> 
> 
> John
> +1-484-962-0060
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: v6ops <v6ops-bounces@ietf.org> on behalf of Fred Baker
> <fred@cisco.com>
> Date: Friday, January 1, 2016 at 09:00
> To: v6ops <v6ops@ietf.org>
> Subject: [v6ops] State of play
> 
>> RFC Editor: EDIT
>> 	2015-11-23	draft-ietf-v6ops-reducing-ra-energy-consumption
>> 	2015-10-26	draft-ietf-v6ops-siit-dc
>> 	2015-10-26	draft-ietf-v6ops-siit-dc-2xlat
>> 	2015-10-26	draft-ietf-v6ops-siit-eam
>> 
>> RFC Editor: In ISE Review
>> 	2015-12-17	draft-ietf-v6ops-mobile-device-profile
>> 
>> RFC Editor: RFC-EDITOR
>> 	2015-10-19	draft-ietf-v6ops-pmtud-ecmp-problem
>> 
>> WG: Unupdated WG Document
>> 	2015-10-19	draft-ietf-v6ops-design-choices
>> 	2015-07-06	draft-ietf-v6ops-dhcpv6-slaac-problem
>> 
>> WG: Updated WG Document
>> 	2015-12-10	draft-ietf-v6ops-host-addr-availability
>> 	2015-11-01	draft-ietf-v6ops-unique-ipv6-prefix-per-host
>> 
>> WG: WG Consensus: Waiting for Write-Up
>> 	2015-12-11	draft-ietf-v6ops-ipv6-ehs-in-real-world
>> 
>> Individual Submission: Unupdated
>> 	2015-10-19	draft-jjmb-v6ops-unique-ipv6-prefix-per-host
>> 	2015-10-19	draft-xu-v6ops-dslite-redundancy
>> 	2015-10-15	draft-gont-v6ops-ipv6-ehs-packet-drops
>> 	2015-10-10	draft-bao-v6ops-rfc6145bis
>> 	2015-09-21	draft-ybai-v6ops-ipv6-for-openstack
>> 	2015-07-06	draft-akira-v6ops-mape-experience
>> 	2015-07-06	draft-xcf-v6ops-chinatelecom-deployment
>> 	2015-07-05	draft-hui-v6ops-ipv6trans-select-nfv
>> 	2015-07-05	draft-xli-v6ops-cernet-deployment
>> 	2015-07-05	draft-yang-v6ops-ipv6tran-select
>> 
>> Individual Submission: Updated
>> 	2015-11-05	draft-templin-v6ops-pdhost
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> v6ops mailing list
>> v6ops@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops
>> 
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email