Re: [v6ops] IPv10 Discussion in v6ops

Simon Hobson <linux@thehobsons.co.uk> Mon, 14 September 2020 13:09 UTC

Return-Path: <linux@thehobsons.co.uk>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B863C3A096C for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 14 Sep 2020 06:09:55 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.897
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.897 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id XhMh02rBqbbq for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 14 Sep 2020 06:09:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from patsy.thehobsons.co.uk (patsy.thehobsons.co.uk [80.229.10.150]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 54AFF3A0966 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Mon, 14 Sep 2020 06:09:53 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at patsy.thehobsons.co.uk
Received: from [192.168.137.104] (unknown [192.168.137.104]) by patsy.thehobsons.co.uk (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 340CA6401B for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Mon, 14 Sep 2020 13:09:50 +0000 (UTC)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.2 \(2104\))
From: Simon Hobson <linux@thehobsons.co.uk>
In-Reply-To: <VI1P194MB028561F81F5118ABC14967DFAE230@VI1P194MB0285.EURP194.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2020 14:09:48 +0100
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <3B5995B1-CD7A-444C-AD64-37C09E46A763@thehobsons.co.uk>
References: <159985752195.15551.2657932726923781035@ietfa.amsl.com> <VI1P194MB0285E344B7B3E9697E6ED608AE240@VI1P194MB0285.EURP194.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM> <3FA82C44-0005-45BA-AB09-FAE63C8CD626@gmail.com> <VI1P194MB028561F81F5118ABC14967DFAE230@VI1P194MB0285.EURP194.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
To: "v6ops@ietf.org" <v6ops@ietf.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.2104)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/CCI5wsT7B_od6fLUpgXka8XJLb0>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] IPv10 Discussion in v6ops
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2020 13:09:56 -0000

Khaled Omar <eng.khaled.omar@outlook.com> wrote:

>> Is it possible to reserve a slot for the IPv10 I-D to be presented completely during the v6ops wg meeting session?
>> 
>> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-omar-ipv10-06

I only had a quick look, but doesn't this just re-hash discussions/documentation that's already been done elsewhere ?
Also, I think calling it IPv10 is just asking to cause confusion - it should be rejected just for that ;-)

Simon