Re: [v6ops] draft-moreiras-v6ops-rfc3849bis-00

Mark Andrews <marka@isc.org> Mon, 12 August 2013 22:07 UTC

Return-Path: <marka@isc.org>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4469221E805A for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 12 Aug 2013 15:07:57 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.147
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.147 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.148, BAYES_00=-2.599, J_CHICKENPOX_13=0.6]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id o4lBEBcGGsbD for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 12 Aug 2013 15:07:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx.pao1.isc.org (mx.pao1.isc.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:0:2::2b]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F77A21E8050 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Mon, 12 Aug 2013 15:07:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx.pao1.isc.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx.pao1.isc.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B11AC944E; Mon, 12 Aug 2013 22:07:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from marka@isc.org)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=isc.org; s=dkim2012; t=1376345271; bh=ETrMyKdiGYGAFebOsRAS7XtHbyv5OmQc6zGm1t8AHI8=; h=To:Cc:From:References:Subject:In-reply-to:Date; b=plLjam4lVAIWIMl9coJz970xBGmUE6uL5SelDIsE9CYR7ciacQqRvIqff5OCE/EQU ayHCZgb9qC045oMa5Jy4BzaANQJh9IRUamFhguE2RWUfFHFriiaoNqj+F5NqDTiQ2F 34TZOxQdGhSW7vTyVPupSrEXGtnG7SioJnqcAiKg=
Received: from zmx1.isc.org (zmx1.isc.org [149.20.0.20]) by mx.pao1.isc.org (Postfix) with ESMTP; Mon, 12 Aug 2013 22:07:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from marka@isc.org)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by zmx1.isc.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E996C160435; Mon, 12 Aug 2013 22:12:17 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from zmx1.isc.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (zmx1.isc.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10032) with ESMTP id AI4S0mpJ691f; Mon, 12 Aug 2013 22:12:16 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from zmx1.isc.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by zmx1.isc.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4AEC3160434; Mon, 12 Aug 2013 22:12:16 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from drugs.dv.isc.org (c211-30-183-50.carlnfd1.nsw.optusnet.com.au [211.30.183.50]) by zmx1.isc.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3A235160431; Mon, 12 Aug 2013 22:12:15 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from drugs.dv.isc.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by drugs.dv.isc.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C5E993845404; Tue, 13 Aug 2013 08:07:33 +1000 (EST)
To: Owen DeLong <owen@delong.com>
From: Mark Andrews <marka@isc.org>
References: <5207D42F.2030302@nic.br> <5207E319.6070601@nic.br> <B66D2D0C-DE6D-49CC-A87A-7C65B5360DB4@delong.com> <52082128.5090503@nic.br> <C7478DBE-5F73-442B-B773-D1B2CF7E0935@delong.com>
In-reply-to: Your message of "Mon, 12 Aug 2013 09:55:36 -0700." <C7478DBE-5F73-442B-B773-D1B2CF7E0935@delong.com>
Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2013 08:07:33 +1000
Message-Id: <20130812220733.C5E993845404@drugs.dv.isc.org>
X-DCC--Metrics: post.isc.org; whitelist
Cc: Alejandro Acosta <aacosta@rocketmail.com>, v6ops@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [v6ops] draft-moreiras-v6ops-rfc3849bis-00
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/v6ops>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Aug 2013 22:07:57 -0000

In message <C7478DBE-5F73-442B-B773-D1B2CF7E0935@delong.com>om>, Owen DeLong writes:
> 
> On Aug 11, 2013, at 16:41 , Antonio M. Moreiras <moreiras@nic.br> wrote:
> 
> > On 11/08/13 19:29, Owen DeLong wrote:
> >> I support the idea. It might be worth also asking for a ULA Doc slice at the same time.
> >> I think a /48 is probably sufficient for most ULA examples.
> >> 
> >> But I think it would be good to be able to write up ULA examples and training that use
> >> actual ULA prefixes intended for documentation.
> > 
> > I agree. An organization could generate an ULA prefix specifically to
> > use in a course, or document. But it could be copied and used in
> > production environments. This would break the "global uniqueness", and
> > could lead to other problems. It would be nice to have a specific ULA
> > documentation prefix.
> > 
> > I would suggest a prefix with the L bit cleared, easy to remember, and
> > maybe slightly shorter than /48. For example FC00:0:D0C0::/44.
> > 
> > []s
> > Moreiras.
> 
> That would certainly be an acceptable solution as far as I am concerned.

So you would use a Centrally Assigned ULA to document Locally Assigned ULAs?
What are you smoking today?  The is a BIG NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!!!!!!
 
> Owen
> 
> _______________________________________________
> v6ops mailing list
> v6ops@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops
-- 
Mark Andrews, ISC
1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia
PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742                 INTERNET: marka@isc.org