[v6ops] Re: Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-link-v6ops-6mops-01.txt

[David Farmer <[e-mail]>]

On Sun, Jul 7, 2024 at 4:01 PM Brian E Carpenter <
[e-mail]> wrote:

> On 08-Jul-24 05:36, David Farmer wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Sun, Jul 7, 2024 at 6:26 AM Jen Linkova <[e-mail] <mailto:
> [e-mail]>> wrote:
> >
> >     Here is the -01 version , which incorporates the feedback received on
> >     the list and after my presentations at IETF119 and RIPE88.
> >
> >     Comments are appreciated (Brian, I'm still not sure about the Privacy
> >     Considerations, looking forward to your suggestions!).
> >
> >
> > Maybe say;
> >
> > This document does not introduce any new privacy considerations.
> IPv6-mostly networks have the same privacy considerations as other
> Dual-stacked or IPv6-only networks.
>
> I believe that's correct. I was wondering whether we could state that an
> IPv6-only node will have more privacy protection than a dual stack node,
> but I don't think that's the case. (Except if the dual stack node has a
> globally unique IPv4 address, perhaps. We tend to assume that NAT44 is
> always present.)
>

Maybe, but given that IPv6-mostly networks support IPv4-only, dual-stack,
and IPv6-only clients, saying anything that excludes one of the client
types from the others is probably inappropriate.

 Thanks.

===============================================
David Farmer               Email:[e-mail]
Networking & Telecommunication Services
Office of Information Technology
University of Minnesota
2218 University Ave SE        Phone: [phone]
Minneapolis, MN 55414-3029   Cell: 612-812-9952
===============================================