IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] draft-ietf-v6ops-ula-usage-recommendations - work or abandon?

sthaug@nethelp.no Fri, 06 November 2015 05:31 UTC

Return-Path: <sthaug@nethelp.no>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 11C361A0203 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 5 Nov 2015 21:31:14 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.211
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.211 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id SuBDv7gbYEdP for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 5 Nov 2015 21:31:10 -0800 (PST)
Received: from bizet.nethelp.no (bizet.nethelp.no [195.1.209.33]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 7BF721A0193 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Thu, 5 Nov 2015 21:31:09 -0800 (PST)
Received: (qmail 94937 invoked from network); 6 Nov 2015 05:31:07 -0000
Received: from bizet.nethelp.no (HELO localhost) (195.1.209.33) by bizet.nethelp.no with SMTP; 6 Nov 2015 05:31:07 -0000
Date: Fri, 06 Nov 2015 06:31:06 +0100
Message-Id: <20151106.063106.74659839.sthaug@nethelp.no>
To: igor@gashinsky.net
From: sthaug@nethelp.no
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.64.1511050424410.1055@moonbase.nullrouteit.net>
References: <CAKD1Yr3Vsn7Ny_xSCr_=sVCHyU+=ZrRh2iQDUPx-5FWdHajv2w@mail.gmail.com> <D2614A6A.CA099%Lee.Howard@twcable.com> <Pine.LNX.4.64.1511050424410.1055@moonbase.nullrouteit.net>
X-Mailer: Mew version 3.3 on Emacs 21.3 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/CObUcwZgLDyGY2NpuTxGJvqzQ0A>
Cc: v6ops@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [v6ops] draft-ietf-v6ops-ula-usage-recommendations - work or abandon?
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 06 Nov 2015 05:31:14 -0000

> That makes it sound like IETF is not "endorsing" NPT66, as opposed to 
> actively recommending that people don't use it. I'm with Lorenzo here -  
> I would prefer very strong language in the form of "deployment of NPT66 is 
> concidered harmful" or "we strongly recommend against the use of NPT66".

Okay, one more operator then. I want to have NPT66 (and ULA) available
in the toolbox.

Steinar Haug, AS 2116

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email