IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] I-D Action: draft-ietf-v6ops-reducing-ra-energy-consumption-02.txt

Alexandre Petrescu <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com> Fri, 06 November 2015 01:54 UTC

Return-Path: <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A6E921B2AEE for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 5 Nov 2015 17:54:28 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.983
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.983 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.001, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HELO_EQ_FR=0.35, NML_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_SOFTFAIL=0.665] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ePDe1odEiLR6 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 5 Nov 2015 17:54:26 -0800 (PST)
Received: from sainfoin-out.extra.cea.fr (sainfoin-out.extra.cea.fr [132.167.192.145]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 428E41B2AF2 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Thu, 5 Nov 2015 17:54:26 -0800 (PST)
Received: from pisaure.intra.cea.fr (pisaure.intra.cea.fr [132.166.88.21]) by sainfoin.extra.cea.fr (8.15.2/8.15.2/CEAnet-Internet-out-2.4) with ESMTP id tA61sOXU024457 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Fri, 6 Nov 2015 02:54:24 +0100
Received: from pisaure.intra.cea.fr (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Postfix) with SMTP id C7A43201004 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Fri, 6 Nov 2015 03:00:25 +0100 (CET)
Received: from muguet1.intra.cea.fr (muguet1.intra.cea.fr [132.166.192.6]) by pisaure.intra.cea.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF6DC200FE1 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Fri, 6 Nov 2015 03:00:25 +0100 (CET)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] ([132.166.84.7]) by muguet1.intra.cea.fr (8.15.2/8.15.2/CEAnet-Intranet-out-1.4) with ESMTP id tA61sK6I002647 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Fri, 6 Nov 2015 02:54:23 +0100
To: v6ops@ietf.org
References: <20151001150947.6527.30286.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <CAKD1Yr3Xw=ddZieF0OzU=wyqs2P5WXvRh8CXn1S2qS6WEZmb9A@mail.gmail.com> <E616A912-FC4D-4EBE-ABFA-17CD60CC5D79@cisco.com> <563AB521.8000309@acm.org> <714D355E-81FA-4D5D-95CA-BF3FE15C17C1@nestlabs.com> <CAKD1Yr060tf1N+ReZDv=xBy7uV=dNQ2VjQ1D+QBGC8-uz8R0ww@mail.gmail.com> <1D37A3AC-68E8-402B-BE1A-51EC3075A2A1@umn.edu>
From: Alexandre Petrescu <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <563C084C.90305@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 06 Nov 2015 10:54:20 +0900
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.3.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <1D37A3AC-68E8-402B-BE1A-51EC3075A2A1@umn.edu>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/CRW9XB5-1_vyjtdhwyBJ8FXQLtY>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] I-D Action: draft-ietf-v6ops-reducing-ra-energy-consumption-02.txt
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 06 Nov 2015 01:54:28 -0000


Le 06/11/2015 00:12, David Farmer a écrit :
>
>
> --
> ===============================================
> David Farmer                          Email: farmer@umn.edu
> <mailto:farmer@umn.edu>
> Office of Information Technology
> University of Minnesota
> 2218 University Ave SE         Phone: +1-612-626-0815
> Minneapolis, MN 55414-3029   Cell: +1-612-812-9952
> ===============================================
>
>
> On Nov 5, 2015, at 01:32, Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@google.com
> <mailto:lorenzo@google.com>> wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Nov 5, 2015 at 3:00 PM, James Woodyatt <jhw@nestlabs.com
>> <mailto:jhw@nestlabs.com>> wrote:
>>
>>     I’m opposed to that suggestion. The practice described in section
>>     5.2 is necessary today for dealing with behavior of deployed
>>     networks that conform to existing standards. If 6MAN wants to
>>     clarify or improve the ND6 specification to change the need for
>>     the behavior documented here, then that would be splendid, but
>>     please count me on the list of people who prefer not to wait for
>>     the deliberations in 6MAN to resolve successfully before a
>>     practical solution to real world problems can be applied.
>>
>>
>> Erik, James and I worked on this together and I believe we're OK with
>> the following text:
>>
>>    1.  Maintaining IPv6 connectivity requires that hosts be able to
>>        receive periodic multicast RAs [RFC4861]. Therefore, hosts that
>>        process unicast packets sent while they are asleep MUST also
>>        process multicast RAs sent while they are asleep. Hosts MAY
>>        rate-limit identical RAs if they are sent too frequently.
>>
>>    2.  Mobile devices that do not intend to maintain IPv6 connectivity
>>        while asleep SHOULD either disconnect from the network, abandoning
>>        all IPv6 configuration, or perform DNAv6 procedures [RFC6059]
>>        when waking up.
>>
>> Erik, James, can you confirm?
>
> I still don't understand why this is using the term "mobile device", and
> the rest of the text uses "battery-powered host".

If one needs to say mobile device, it would be ok to follow the 
terminology in the Mobility Terminology RFC - a Mobile Node.

Alex
>
> Thanks
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> v6ops mailing list
> v6ops@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email