Re: [v6ops] draft-ietf-v6ops-mobile-device-profile last call

joel jaeggli <joelja@bogus.com> Sat, 31 January 2015 22:28 UTC

Return-Path: <joelja@bogus.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 492151A011B for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 31 Jan 2015 14:28:31 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.91
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.91 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id yJycGLBHBxAa for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 31 Jan 2015 14:28:29 -0800 (PST)
Received: from nagasaki.bogus.com (nagasaki.bogus.com [IPv6:2001:418:1::81]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 03A371A1BE0 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Sat, 31 Jan 2015 14:28:28 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mb-aye.local ([172.56.15.117]) (authenticated bits=0) by nagasaki.bogus.com (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id t0VMSL49056843 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT); Sat, 31 Jan 2015 22:28:25 GMT (envelope-from joelja@bogus.com)
Message-ID: <54CD3FB7.3020402@bogus.com>
Date: Sat, 31 Jan 2015 12:48:55 -0800
From: joel jaeggli <joelja@bogus.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.10; rv:34.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/34.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: mohamed.boucadair@orange.com, Gert Doering <gert@space.net>
References: <8B808F0C-1AA8-4ABE-A06E-80652B9C1498@cisco.com> <B7D61F30-BAC4-4BE0-A5FD-1D4BD4652E55@employees.org> <20150129201251.GD34798@Space.Net> <787AE7BB302AE849A7480A190F8B933004902668@OPEXCLILM23.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup> <20150130103924.GG34798@Space.Net> <787AE7BB302AE849A7480A190F8B933004902889@OPEXCLILM23.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup>
In-Reply-To: <787AE7BB302AE849A7480A190F8B933004902889@OPEXCLILM23.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="bhcTQ9DcUcTpUl0rSV137uV9xWiA8w0tE"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/D3oIIuWwvcO-9r_RERPHfiG1KUw>
Cc: "draft-ietf-v6ops-mobile-device-profile.all@tools.ietf.org" <draft-ietf-v6ops-mobile-device-profile.all@tools.ietf.org>, V6 Ops List <v6ops@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] draft-ietf-v6ops-mobile-device-profile last call
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 31 Jan 2015 22:28:31 -0000

On 1/30/15 4:21 AM, mohamed.boucadair@orange.com wrote:
> Re-,
> 
> With all due respect, I'm afraid we are not discussing whether the
> document is needed or not but (as I see it) whether the new version
> does not break the WG consensus that was declared for the version
> sent to the IESG. I recall that both the WG and IETF consensus were
> declared for the version sent to the IESG.

One point on that. Part of the reason we are engaged canvasing, is that
Brian's discussed questioned my interpretation of the consensus call.
Given that I conceded from the outset that the call is somewhat narrow,
one of the questions before us as a w.g. and the ietf community is, is
that consensus more unequivocal?  Brian I believe is willing to extended
the benefit of the doubt. So am I, but it's the working groups document...

thanks

joel

> Thank you.
> 
> Cheers, Med
> 
> -----Message d'origine----- De : Gert Doering [mailto:gert@space.net]
>  Envoyé : vendredi 30 janvier 2015 11:39 À : BOUCADAIR Mohamed
> IMT/OLN Cc : Gert Doering; Ole Troan; Fred Baker (fred);
> draft-ietf-v6ops-mobile-device-profile.all@tools.ietf.org; V6 Ops
> List Objet : Re: [v6ops] draft-ietf-v6ops-mobile-device-profile last
> call
> 
> Hi,
> 
> On Fri, Jan 30, 2015 at 09:12:16AM +0000,
> mohamed.boucadair@orange.com wrote:
>> Can you please help us identifying technical flaws that you think
>> need to be fixed in the document?
> 
> I don't think there is a need for this document, and I can't truly
> see it reflecting WG consensus.  So it's more fundamental than just
> individual technical issues.
> 
> For the specifics, everything that Lorenzo said.
> 
> Gert Doering -- NetMaster
>