IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] draft-ietf-v6ops-ula-usage-recommendations - work or abandon?

Nick Hilliard <nick@foobar.org> Fri, 06 November 2015 10:15 UTC

Return-Path: <nick@foobar.org>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 043BF1B38A4 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 6 Nov 2015 02:15:47 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id cOrKehquM6TP for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 6 Nov 2015 02:15:45 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.netability.ie (mail.netability.ie [IPv6:2a03:8900:0:100::5]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AFC191B38A6 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Fri, 6 Nov 2015 02:15:32 -0800 (PST)
X-Envelope-To: v6ops@ietf.org
Received: from cupcake.local (089-101-070076.ntlworld.ie [89.101.70.76] (may be forged)) (authenticated bits=0) by mail.netability.ie (8.15.2/8.14.9) with ESMTPSA id tA6AFUxY040258 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 6 Nov 2015 10:15:30 GMT (envelope-from nick@foobar.org)
X-Authentication-Warning: cheesecake.ibn.ie: Host 089-101-070076.ntlworld.ie [89.101.70.76] (may be forged) claimed to be cupcake.local
To: Gert Doering <gert@space.net>, "Howard, Lee" <lee.howard@twcable.com>
References: <CAKD1Yr1VvzkSmJo3hu6t_3CUguLN_UkNZjRUqvU_ygPBTyb+8g@mail.gmail.com> <8AE0F17B87264D4CAC7DE0AA6C406F45C2319739@nkgeml506-mbx.china.huawei.com> <CAKD1Yr3g-ZV+MkbtDrusbtYaZ_wmCxDG9XbT25Ldma4koGpV6A@mail.gmail.com> <D25E7DDF.C9709%Lee.Howard@twcable.com> <CAKD1Yr3Vsn7Ny_xSCr_=sVCHyU+=ZrRh2iQDUPx-5FWdHajv2w@mail.gmail.com> <D2614A6A.CA099%Lee.Howard@twcable.com> <563B9D1E.4030606@umn.edu> <D261FE8E.CA1FB%Lee.Howard@twcable.com> <563BEBCE.40204@gmail.com> <D2622CC9.CA382%Lee.Howard@twcable.com> <20151106072616.GS70452@Space.Net>
From: Nick Hilliard <nick@foobar.org>
Message-ID: <563C7DC2.3010704@foobar.org>
Date: Fri, 06 Nov 2015 10:15:30 +0000
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.11; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.3.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20151106072616.GS70452@Space.Net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/D5eEh1ynFyrzUUTYJ7t4R6ghQN4>
Cc: IPv6 Operations <v6ops@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] draft-ietf-v6ops-ula-usage-recommendations - work or abandon?
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 06 Nov 2015 10:15:47 -0000

On 06/11/2015 07:26, Gert Doering wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 06, 2015 at 01:31:02AM +0000, Howard, Lee wrote:
>> Proposed text:
>> ... it does have significant implications to applications, as documented
>> in [RFC6296] Section 5, which may  cause some applications to break.
>>
>> Thus this document does not recommend the use of ULA+NPTv6.
> 
> This I can perfectly agree to - it's a different message ("understand 
> well what you do if you insist on going there"), and clear enough.

this is verging on "delenda est carthago" territory.

Nick

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email