IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] new draft: draft-yc-v6ops-solicited-ra-unicast

Alexandru Petrescu <alexandru.petrescu@gmail.com> Wed, 22 July 2015 15:25 UTC

Return-Path: <alexandru.petrescu@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F6811A037C for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 22 Jul 2015 08:25:43 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.983
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.983 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.001, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HELO_EQ_FR=0.35, NML_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_SOFTFAIL=0.665] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id N7N8F9wQE1mz for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 22 Jul 2015 08:25:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from oxalide-out.extra.cea.fr (oxalide-out.extra.cea.fr [132.168.224.8]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B48DC1A0100 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Wed, 22 Jul 2015 08:25:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pisaure.intra.cea.fr (pisaure.intra.cea.fr [132.166.88.21]) by oxalide.extra.cea.fr (8.14.2/8.14.2/CEAnet-Internet-out-2.3) with ESMTP id t6MFPcqZ003087; Wed, 22 Jul 2015 17:25:38 +0200
Received: from pisaure.intra.cea.fr (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Postfix) with SMTP id 2721F2029FC; Wed, 22 Jul 2015 17:29:14 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from muguet2.intra.cea.fr (muguet2.intra.cea.fr [132.166.192.7]) by pisaure.intra.cea.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 17EFE2027C0; Wed, 22 Jul 2015 17:29:14 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] ([132.166.84.215]) by muguet2.intra.cea.fr (8.13.8/8.13.8/CEAnet-Intranet-out-1.2) with ESMTP id t6MFPbbW021543; Wed, 22 Jul 2015 17:25:38 +0200
To: Jared Mauch <jared@puck.Nether.net>, Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@google.com>
References: <CAKD1Yr1xnKaYrFG4izZ4MbB1aRh89CGzTkc1ZjjryOgvdN0hQw@mail.gmail.com> <55AF889F.6080206@gmail.com> <CAFU7BAShd1qOhLi5aRhO31_WFHFXZyUdgMEAi4CGZ=t1cL49JA@mail.gmail.com> <CAKD1Yr0+8VtcuXRMBu875gTzUj4BeXX+0T7xWVKFWEiDV7ffJg@mail.gmail.com> <55AF908A.4010906@gmail.com> <CAKD1Yr1K_eYq9MuNWgJGxmr7YE9UrcprwX4iCEOZtCn8KETyRg@mail.gmail.com> <55AF9265.9070608@gmail.com> <CAKD1Yr3yrO+g+LU+gp6J-HxTHstdDcbvWLYJRJ-jz+XN++xeRw@mail.gmail.com> <55AF94E0.5050802@gmail.com> <CAKD1Yr1TmWnypKbzdT+pmv_j1jS5c295QusrrjAKtbUXdoP7Rg@mail.gmail.com> <20150722142711.GA23678@puck.nether.net>
From: Alexandru Petrescu <alexandru.petrescu@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <55AFB5F1.4030904@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Jul 2015 17:25:37 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20150722142711.GA23678@puck.nether.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/D9CpB6hT3QdSnb-yexVkwlJQ-Tc>
Cc: "v6ops@ietf.org WG" <v6ops@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] new draft: draft-yc-v6ops-solicited-ra-unicast
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 Jul 2015 15:25:43 -0000

I agree, 'green devices' is right.

But dont make it that multicast is expensive in terms of energy. 
Actually multicast is a tool to make devices save on energy.

Alex

Le 22/07/2015 16:27, Jared Mauch a écrit :
> On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 03:15:33PM +0200, Lorenzo Colitti wrote:
>> On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 3:04 PM, Alexandru Petrescu <
>> alexandru.petrescu@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Ok, we can change "battery-powered" to "exclusively battery-powered" in
>>>> the next revision of the draft.
>>>>
>>>
>>> No, I didnt mean that.
>>>
>>> Maybe "exclusively li-ion 7.2V 700maH batteries".
>>>
>>
>> "Devices where network communication has non-negligible affect on battery
>> life"
>
> 	While this is clearly obvious on devices that require sipping
> power that they are not working right, it may exist in other devices
> or poorly implemented hardware on wired devices which are asleep.  Dave
> Thaler talked yesterday about the logo requirements for MSFT in the hardware
> to do ARP and NDP offload.
>
> 	I suspect instead of arguging about the nits here some generic
> text would be most constructive.  Call it "Green" to use lower power
> by having unicast vs multicast/broadcast traffic.
>
> 	- Jared
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email