IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] Incremental Deployment of IPv6-only Wi-Fi for IETF Meetings

Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com> Mon, 17 July 2017 08:32 UTC

Return-Path: <mellon@fugue.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C1FBC131771 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 17 Jul 2017 01:32:56 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=fugue-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id FKkXMCDsUwdT for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 17 Jul 2017 01:32:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pf0-x22c.google.com (mail-pf0-x22c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c00::22c]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 76C63131798 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Mon, 17 Jul 2017 01:32:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pf0-x22c.google.com with SMTP id q86so73072284pfl.3 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Mon, 17 Jul 2017 01:32:55 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=fugue-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=w7CIgr8EMWO1kEQFZxb9Z71s9iAXA0vrmbDlz7MTrhM=; b=0n/9EOQfYLdRHV4Kyz2GMz9fmYvvk7A64pLx8FXxYPrUewFnrAkTM4r5aEMHEhe9GO ROApcXyZFmFeQ5trBHelD8yMS8FwGd8ErqMXXCzJK42X9s+RaFFfnA9VmrEfEPmWnYDN XciLHRxVguVVgCPYZIIRcgM2eEmGf4jDiZLe8UDnhwmrg0sZRKlgcWoQYFTxN41G8wCf DqTerjeO4TdQ4e9Ll9ASaSIRz1ew9EuitE7JP8clmH8ZJwEhVv9mYJ1MPZKeFfHmAf5s +ch4ZFa+8tJVaqEbIgOLfDmgUcD/F7mipdzWUYnJElkXO+p0Ep7OxFG/EXrYuQ6AOqwH 3BeA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=w7CIgr8EMWO1kEQFZxb9Z71s9iAXA0vrmbDlz7MTrhM=; b=JLoHjCa0F/+M0K0YMP/3KXNSVdodxoObAbHnhUXynUmErmVkeK6qZOL2l2PtamZNKW 7hIpD/eJvkNxR7wveUisn6SAyTesNmtbvEywjal9G/H06boYhKCCMuMbagZaQxPLbiwn rxSMuP97A5PdVa4PIYjtUzzwptlv6K+edna4TJkCvd5Wq2ztMhcr99qrUFgonsIm5Ldt hWzR/5LWdRWnnUmoSQKMvwSe55QK+nGL1nz0duIgXEDh6CC7pIX7OATieFgnAz6u3IF3 Y3j3gk/VU0zQaq/5jDM/wDnWJia1N4zxx/HUhHgt6Wxv9XpP2iid5XnqYhK21YB7Aiv7 ZlCg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AIVw112UYFDqm34PsnaVTlUSLHHD3uaQZbckxTMpHwEADbojyzAJ8zOm oU8LICIUF1o8ghcL5igkj0XyqODWvqNY
X-Received: by 10.84.211.2 with SMTP id b2mr2655056pli.294.1500280375041; Mon, 17 Jul 2017 01:32:55 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.100.181.42 with HTTP; Mon, 17 Jul 2017 01:32:14 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAFU7BASvuj+JrsSZzUKauBsph4hdr+ZdVjkg0_Q+00Spm5PJoQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <7643C1DC-76A3-4652-9BB1-D0D42801F37E@consulintel.es> <CAFU7BASvuj+JrsSZzUKauBsph4hdr+ZdVjkg0_Q+00Spm5PJoQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2017 10:32:14 +0200
Message-ID: <CAPt1N1=Rc6mF7vPmk6=5Xf+KYJUFsNfFQvZRkL6VGOff701BQg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Jen Linkova <furry13@gmail.com>
Cc: Jordi Palet Martinez <jordi.palet@consulintel.es>, Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>, "v6ops@ietf.org" <v6ops@ietf.org>, Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>, Alissa Cooper <alissa@cooperw.in>, Jim Martin <jim@daedelus.com>, Suresh Krishnan <suresh.krishnan@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="94eb2c0932b4d176f805547f3e13"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/DJCKusxHGWrm4KNQomIPVJ2dJZA>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] Incremental Deployment of IPv6-only Wi-Fi for IETF Meetings
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2017 08:32:57 -0000

On Mon, Jul 17, 2017 at 10:30 AM, Jen Linkova <furry13@gmail.com> wrote:

> Actually if the fallback dual-stack network requires an explicit
> configuration on the client side (as the draft recommends) to avoid
> users connecting to it accidentally, the number of clients falling
> back to the dual stack SSID is very good data point to demonstrate
> what % of users are experiencing issues.


Yes!

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email