Re: [v6ops] GRASP

Sander Steffann <sander@steffann.nl> Sun, 14 January 2018 11:12 UTC

Return-Path: <sander@steffann.nl>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE698127058 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 14 Jan 2018 03:12:39 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.001
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.001 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=steffann.nl
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id RaVOghkp-Jde for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 14 Jan 2018 03:12:38 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.sintact.nl (mail.sintact.nl [IPv6:2001:9e0:803::6]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D9E711270AB for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Sun, 14 Jan 2018 03:12:37 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.sintact.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id BEAAF4B; Sun, 14 Jan 2018 12:12:34 +0100 (CET)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=steffann.nl; h= x-mailer:references:message-id:content-transfer-encoding:date :date:in-reply-to:from:from:subject:subject:mime-version :content-type:content-type:received:received; s=mail; t= 1515928352; bh=6owUvthKIAgMY2emSed51INM2Moza2OLpNnSKUA+ByM=; b=c CgpP1HGR6UrbWkW47ZEWnQR2caNGbq5Dvwx2Ky9E58St5n2caa+Brpi+gkISVEnH bwkzVEI0sFw22Zd2NBxU1eHRBvrmVppGcA0qgPjQNBmC+OO0NJMQgp3LdP7dBHBQ V5XTTxFweXF3Ykd6VFAXiLPO5wI7F96B+ANeEWBpM4=
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at mail.sintact.nl
Received: from mail.sintact.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.sintact.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id nWhDzLZBANQD; Sun, 14 Jan 2018 12:12:32 +0100 (CET)
Received: from [IPv6:2a02:a213:a301:1000:547:2140:ed09:a6c0] (unknown [IPv6:2a02:a213:a301:1000:547:2140:ed09:a6c0]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mail.sintact.nl (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A150F4A; Sun, 14 Jan 2018 12:12:31 +0100 (CET)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 11.1 \(3445.4.7\))
X-Clacks-Overhead: GNU Terry Pratchett
From: Sander Steffann <sander@steffann.nl>
In-Reply-To: <CAO42Z2y6rO8S-F93J6BDcMzgkHb4-czuQd-1QArzM3MfO77EKw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 14 Jan 2018 12:12:30 +0100
Cc: james woodyatt <jhw@google.com>, v6ops list <v6ops@ietf.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <EC75835C-7ACA-4FF9-8A98-467EA7222021@steffann.nl>
References: <fc31bd170b134c8292d33f52400b175b@XCH15-06-08.nw.nos.boeing.com> <268669d2-e36d-9fb1-cf1c-d3be4cb85e51@gmail.com> <8316cc707dd847a8b2d45e4b6b468f36@XCH15-06-08.nw.nos.boeing.com> <2D09D61DDFA73D4C884805CC7865E6114DCDD69B@GAALPA1MSGUSRBF.ITServices.sbc.com> <0EFD6879-B33B-4639-AE77-A90607DD9455@google.com> <90825185-6fd2-296d-229f-43a79e16bb63@gmail.com> <B07B4644-B5DC-408E-8130-0832AFAE47E2@google.com> <CAO42Z2y6rO8S-F93J6BDcMzgkHb4-czuQd-1QArzM3MfO77EKw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Mark Smith <markzzzsmith@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.4.7)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/DeuWhRXBU7AGoDpLum9SJbr9QkY>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] GRASP
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 14 Jan 2018 11:12:40 -0000

Hi,

> I wonder if it would be better to have the "NAT66" device be the true
> application end-point for all communications, and then have it
> communicate with the down stream devices "internally" via a ULA
> address space, as internal application inter-process communication.

So, back to using proxy servers then.
Sander