Re: [v6ops] I-D Action: draft-ietf-v6ops-6204bis-11.txt

joel jaeggli <joelja@bogus.com> Thu, 27 September 2012 04:26 UTC

Return-Path: <joelja@bogus.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5DE7E21F8470 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 26 Sep 2012 21:26:18 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.149
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.149 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.450, BAYES_00=-2.599, J_CHICKENPOX_13=0.6, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id w6sA0J5X8wMV for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 26 Sep 2012 21:26:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nagasaki.bogus.com (nagasaki.bogus.com [IPv6:2001:418:1::81]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C237321F85DA for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Wed, 26 Sep 2012 21:26:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from joels-MacBook-Air.local (c-98-234-216-143.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [98.234.216.143]) (authenticated bits=0) by nagasaki.bogus.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q8R4QF2e064670 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Thu, 27 Sep 2012 04:26:16 GMT (envelope-from joelja@bogus.com)
Message-ID: <5063D567.8020903@bogus.com>
Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2012 21:26:15 -0700
From: joel jaeggli <joelja@bogus.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.8; rv:16.0) Gecko/20120905 Thunderbird/16.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Ole Trøan <otroan@employees.org>
References: <20120925151932.27238.7903.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <7E131056-FA46-492B-BDA3-FA7EA5CDE7C3@employees.org>
In-Reply-To: <7E131056-FA46-492B-BDA3-FA7EA5CDE7C3@employees.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.7 (nagasaki.bogus.com [147.28.0.81]); Thu, 27 Sep 2012 04:26:16 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: v6ops@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [v6ops] I-D Action: draft-ietf-v6ops-6204bis-11.txt
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/v6ops>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2012 04:26:18 -0000

On 9/26/12 4:12 AM, Ole Trøan wrote:
> from the diffset:
>
>             "Even though this document has Informational status, it specifies	
>   	   requirements using RFC 2119 language, but not strictly for the	
>   	   purpose of interoperability.  Some requirements are intentionally	
>   	   specified for the purpose of establishing industry-common baseline	
>   	   functionality.  As such, the document points to several other	
>   	   specifications (preferable in RFC or stable form) to provide	
>   	   additional guidance to implementers regarding any protocol	
>   	   implementation required to produce a successful CPE router that	
>   	   interoperates successfully with a particular subset of currently	
>   	   deploying and planned common IPv6 access networks."
>
> can we make the document "Proposed Standard" instead?

That's been hashed out on this list and the minutes of the meetings 
already.

The language change is to satisfy an IESG discuss not change the status 
of the document.
> WAA-5: why the change, which in my opinion is just a clumsy fyi addition?

also the product of a discuss.
>
> cheers,
> Ole
>
>
>
> On Sep 25, 2012, at 17:19 , internet-drafts@ietf.org wrote:
>
>> A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
>> This draft is a work item of the IPv6 Operations Working Group of the IETF.
>>
>> 	Title           : Basic Requirements for IPv6 Customer Edge Routers
>> 	Author(s)       : Hemant Singh
>>                           Wes Beebee
>>                           Chris Donley
>>                           Barbara Stark
>> 	Filename        : draft-ietf-v6ops-6204bis-11.txt
>> 	Pages           : 22
>> 	Date            : 2012-09-25
>>
>> Abstract:
>>    This document specifies requirements for an IPv6 Customer Edge (CE)
>>    router.  Specifically, the current version of this document focuses
>>    on the basic provisioning of an IPv6 CE router and the provisioning
>>    of IPv6 hosts attached to it.  The document also covers IP transition
>>    technologies.  Two transition technologies in RFC 5969's 6rd and RFC
>>    6333's DS-Lite are covered in the document.  The document obsoletes
>>    RFC 6204, if approved.
>>
>>
>> The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:
>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-v6ops-6204bis
>>
>> There's also a htmlized version available at:
>> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-v6ops-6204bis-11
>>
>> A diff from the previous version is available at:
>> http://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-v6ops-6204bis-11
>>
>>
>> Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at:
>> ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> v6ops mailing list
>> v6ops@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> v6ops mailing list
> v6ops@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops