IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] Fwd: IETF 108 planning

Robert Raszuk <robert@raszuk.net> Thu, 04 June 2020 07:14 UTC

Return-Path: <robert@raszuk.net>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6FB2D3A07C2 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 4 Jun 2020 00:14:00 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.098
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=raszuk.net
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3gnOluMqZAXs for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 4 Jun 2020 00:13:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ej1-x630.google.com (mail-ej1-x630.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::630]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EF9D13A041D for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Thu, 4 Jun 2020 00:13:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ej1-x630.google.com with SMTP id y13so4911166eju.2 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Thu, 04 Jun 2020 00:13:58 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=raszuk.net; s=google; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=CANo7RwVIJHfIOaCrTS6aNlx4GQWMuOE1/JCLr7yNiA=; b=XaB6HWn7Xs87tBvodtC79DzQuxQMrKAJ3J7UeZFXSFKhfI0OUusP1hyQAxhvGLEsYC YkEr6zg2p39oKAcUzuAH1jrdqeaDdw+fM6NdnJYlbgyilX/1ITztMDalm2LY7OfVrLT3 RkKFGs57sWl1ODVXGS9dGD+7+ehuDSTievwZzLnbE/1qfsrT5xGyZneLJVzYEhZYgH/X QW64Hs10aNWQg6/FBNrgJxv9n7FlxGjPfWFfelAqD8FphiBq0bEW9nUBQq8CK+Z2lNgE MEdb2JzLWByP5BxIYrQbyhyqzR94AjchGoUmvGeQG+jQLNq/kmlmaBd7aiD1EZ/VIL8c E1wg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=CANo7RwVIJHfIOaCrTS6aNlx4GQWMuOE1/JCLr7yNiA=; b=oAd8D9FapoTUNcn8TNmKojJaEPlWRcnwZx1H/fLHZSY7KqFAlCNEaq9QyW3iN95+7k uNm+6e/4ggQAnr+gE+4l/TwDFqcmVLyLsdcsBA4dPgyFoV3HKfqZc7ZDVNvYCzdr5yZH PzkosSjVU+J0q5NxjIwlkZltRjV6xTtUy9d//DU3qvRlXhkr4lX0jLMOqJQKaa/ArJ+U pVigUCWbKo2jh+kaqmjT4vB0I/B7GeaP4IsLgE0r+rD0P4lDvOydsdStM1yQ8VeY5/7g d5oDZQ3scDT/5n07uEL0DqPXxJc/8VaO81MzJOBjx4EMUKR0n0lCqyFlocyG/BVIKT6M C3dw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531VGvbB0KIq4BCIiNlF8Cs/l8T7/VNZAEPOexw3ESWQWvrQ/tEe sNkzXNyy80facoLjZmFGnrxqogrfbQMb+inXIEqXZQ==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxB9/TQ1UB8RqTSwmxvrwD/7mtq9KPO8pgcQ6V3/Bny6JpATMwOcBLOZN3Nwp60i17B6FVQhGccGkfA+v0Cio8=
X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:8253:: with SMTP id f19mr2762393ejx.470.1591254837156; Thu, 04 Jun 2020 00:13:57 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <DM6PR05MB63488D0223B3810B3970767CAE880@DM6PR05MB6348.namprd05.prod.outlook.com> <8EDE375B-90F6-4C31-9E4F-019BC42310B4@gmail.com> <135a2584-7831-91cd-cb42-35815125ff87@si6networks.com>
In-Reply-To: <135a2584-7831-91cd-cb42-35815125ff87@si6networks.com>
From: Robert Raszuk <robert@raszuk.net>
Date: Thu, 04 Jun 2020 09:13:48 +0200
Message-ID: <CAOj+MMFhCxVkCegLH3UeDEDKpQ0GZT8Fw553T=3t7NiF8Q51zQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Fernando Gont <fgont@si6networks.com>
Cc: Fred Baker <fredbaker.ietf@gmail.com>, IPv6 Operations <v6ops@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000050f12705a73ce3b6"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/EAqdmkjFDUbMts0_WuB1JmAUcJU>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] Fwd: IETF 108 planning
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Jun 2020 07:14:00 -0000

> (Actually, I'd say that I'm curious about the need to have a virtual
> IETF 108 -- spreading any virtual interim meetings over time and as
> needed would seem like a much better option to me).
>

100% !!!

I think this is not just for you ... it works ways better for everyone.

Well except LLC perhaps.

That actually puts back on the table the need for regular IETF venue
meetings all together and that is why many people are even afraid that
periodic interims regardless if online or physical could dismiss the need
for global gatherings.

Best,
R.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email