Re: [v6ops] Prep for v6ops IETF 84 agenda
Masanobu Kawashima <kawashimam@vx.jp.nec.com> Tue, 26 June 2012 14:57 UTC
Return-Path: <kawashimam@vx.jp.nec.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 84BF421F85F2 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 26 Jun 2012 07:57:28 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.36
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.36 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.150, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_JP=1.244, HOST_EQ_JP=1.265, J_CHICKENPOX_13=0.6]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id i0ogAMKxFnMJ for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 26 Jun 2012 07:57:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from tyo201.gate.nec.co.jp (TYO201.gate.nec.co.jp [202.32.8.193]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C6B6321F85CD for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Tue, 26 Jun 2012 07:57:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mailgate3.nec.co.jp ([10.7.69.193]) by tyo201.gate.nec.co.jp (8.13.8/8.13.4) with ESMTP id q5QEuGof007662; Tue, 26 Jun 2012 23:56:16 +0900 (JST)
Received: (from root@localhost) by mailgate3.nec.co.jp (8.11.7/3.7W-MAILGATE-NEC) id q5QEuG818181; Tue, 26 Jun 2012 23:56:16 +0900 (JST)
Received: from mail02.kamome.nec.co.jp (mail02.kamome.nec.co.jp [10.25.43.5]) by mailsv4.nec.co.jp (8.13.8/8.13.4) with ESMTP id q5QEuFoj008777; Tue, 26 Jun 2012 23:56:15 +0900 (JST)
Received: from kameyata.jp.nec.com ([10.26.220.29] [10.26.220.29]) by mail01b.kamome.nec.co.jp with ESMTP id BT-MMP-68130; Tue, 26 Jun 2012 23:55:50 +0900
Received: from siznecatg159185 ([10.3.159.185] [10.3.159.185]) by mail.jp.nec.com with ESMTPA id BT-MMP-64238; Tue, 26 Jun 2012 23:55:50 +0900
To: "t.petch" <ietfc@btconnect.com>
In-reply-to: <017901cd538a$e9af8980$4001a8c0@gateway.2wire.net>
Message-Id: <20120626235550kawashimam@mail.jp.nec.com>
References: <017901cd538a$e9af8980$4001a8c0@gateway.2wire.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: StarOffice21/MailClient[4.65 Step9]
From: Masanobu Kawashima <kawashimam@vx.jp.nec.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2012 23:55:49 +0900
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: v6ops@ietf.org, Ron Bonica <ron@bonica.org>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] Prep for v6ops IETF 84 agenda
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/v6ops>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2012 14:57:28 -0000
Hi Tom, Thank you for your comment. We took your opinion into consideration. I think that we did everything we could. Could you please comment us your unclear points or suggestion? If we should revise the document, we will revise it immediately. Regards, Masanobu >I am confused about the legend for >draft-ietf-v6ops-464xlat-03.txt > >There was a lively discussion in May which left a number of issues >unclear for me, and I see that, today, a new version has arrived, so I >think that further discussion should ensue, preferrably on the list. > >Tom Petch > >----- Original Message ----- >From: "Fred Baker (fred)" <fred@cisco.com> >To: <v6ops@ietf.org> >Cc: "Ron Bonica" <ron@bonica.org> >Sent: Monday, June 25, 2012 3:04 AM >Subject: [v6ops] Prep for v6ops IETF 84 agenda > > >> I sat down this morning to assess our agenda. Interested in working >group comment. >> >> # no update >> Jan 11 16:48 draft-yang-v6ops-fast6-pppoe-02.txt >> Feb 21 18:10 draft-ietf-v6ops-ipv6-multihoming-without-ipv6nat-04.txt >> Feb 23 07:29 draft-carpenter-v6ops-icp-guidance-03.txt >> Feb 25 11:37 draft-ietf-v6ops-ivi-icmp-address-01.txt >> Feb 28 08:49 draft-chkpvc-enterprise-incremental-ipv6-00.txt >> Mar 5 17:46 draft-ma-v6ops-terminal-test-00.txt >> Mar 7 07:33 draft-carpenter-v6ops-label-balance-02.txt >> Mar 12 06:21 draft-vanrein-v6ops-6bed4-01.txt >> Mar 12 17:52 draft-chen-v6ops-nat64-experience-01.txt >> Mar 12 21:34 draft-liu-v6ops-ula-usage-analysis-02.txt >> Mar 13 04:59 draft-sunq-v6ops-contents-transition-03.txt >> Mar 30 03:27 draft-donley-v6ops-ce-router-design-00.txt >> Mar 31 11:33 draft-yang-v6ops-fast6-00.txt >> >> #no expressed interest >> Jun 20 11:33 draft-lopez-v6ops-dc-ipv6-02.txt >> Apr 27 12:07 draft-jiang-v6ops-v4v6mc-proxy-01.txt >> >> #out of charter >> Jun 24 07:59 draft-generic-v6ops-tunmtu-07.txt >> May 10 11:44 draft-templin-v6ops-isops-17.txt >> >> #in IESG queue >> May 30 11:10 draft-ietf-v6ops-wireline-incremental-ipv6-04.txt >> May 17 11:02 draft-ietf-v6ops-6204bis-09.txt >> >> >> #WGLC in v6ops or move to sunset4; awaiting AD direction >> May 8 10:14 draft-ietf-v6ops-464xlat-03.txt >> >> #potential for agenda >> Apr 30 13:58 draft-gundavelli-v6ops-community-wifi-svcs-04.txt >> May 16 02:12 draft-kuarsingh-v6ops-6to4-provider-managed-tunnel-06.txt >> May 22 21:30 draft-ietf-v6ops-ra-guard-implementation-04.txt >> >> #for agenda, perhaps ready for last call >> Jun 12 19:26 draft-ietf-v6ops-icp-guidance-01.txt >> >> >> >> For draft-ietf-v6ops-ivi-icmp-address, the last discussion was in >April, and we were to expect an update. If that happens, I expect to >bring that to the agenda. >> >> Lee asked about draft-chkpvc-enterprise-incremental-ipv6 on the list, >but I see no update and I wasn't clear on the list commentary, whether >the operators want to discuss. >> >> There is still, of course, time for folks to post -00 drafts (until 9 >July); if there is list discussion of those drafts, we will include them >in the agenda. >> _______________________________________________ >> v6ops mailing list >> v6ops@ietf.org >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops >> > > >_______________________________________________ >v6ops mailing list >v6ops@ietf.org >https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops ======================================== NEC AccessTechnica, Ltd. Product Development Department Masanobu Kawashima kawashimam@vx.jp.nec.com http://www.necat.co.jp/ ========================================
- [v6ops] Prep for v6ops IETF 84 agenda Fred Baker (fred)
- Re: [v6ops] Prep for v6ops IETF 84 agenda Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [v6ops] Prep for v6ops IETF 84 agenda t.petch
- Re: [v6ops] Prep for v6ops IETF 84 agenda Fred Baker (fred)
- Re: [v6ops] Prep for v6ops IETF 84 agenda Masanobu Kawashima
- Re: [v6ops] Prep for v6ops IETF 84 agenda t.petch
- Re: [v6ops] Prep for v6ops IETF 84 agenda Fred Baker (fred)
- Re: [v6ops] Prep for v6ops IETF 84 agenda Templin, Fred L
- Re: [v6ops] Prep for v6ops IETF 84 agenda Rémi Després
- Re: [v6ops] Prep for v6ops IETF 84 agenda Fred Baker (fred)
- Re: [v6ops] Prep for v6ops IETF 84 agenda Templin, Fred L
- Re: [v6ops] Prep for v6ops IETF 84 agenda Joe Touch
- Re: [v6ops] Prep for v6ops IETF 84 agenda Templin, Fred L
- Re: [v6ops] Prep for v6ops IETF 84 agenda Templin, Fred L
- Re: [v6ops] Prep for v6ops IETF 84 agenda Templin, Fred L
- Re: [v6ops] Prep for v6ops IETF 84 agenda Fred Baker (fred)
- Re: [v6ops] Prep for v6ops IETF 84 agenda Templin, Fred L
- Re: [v6ops] Prep for v6ops IETF 84 agenda Fred Baker (fred)
- Re: [v6ops] Prep for v6ops IETF 84 agenda Templin, Fred L
- Re: [v6ops] Prep for v6ops IETF 84 agenda Diego R. Lopez
- Re: [v6ops] Prep for v6ops IETF 84 agenda Fred Baker (fred)
- Re: [v6ops] Prep for v6ops IETF 84 agenda Eric Vyncke (evyncke)