IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] DHCPv6/SLAAC Make Hosts Confusing-//RE: new draft: draft-liu-bonica-v6ops-dhcpv6-slaac-problem

Andrew Yourtchenko <ayourtch@cisco.com> Tue, 29 October 2013 20:53 UTC

Return-Path: <ayourtch@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B6B5621F9AED for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 29 Oct 2013 13:53:26 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -10.419
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.419 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.180, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id FQB0v62JpGYE for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 29 Oct 2013 13:53:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-2.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-2.cisco.com [173.37.86.73]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F82611E81C8 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Tue, 29 Oct 2013 13:53:05 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=819; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1383079985; x=1384289585; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:message-id: references:mime-version; bh=tdD1KVLDqQm3X/FF1HcQ2uER3RXuiK1xg/r8PbZRZAk=; b=iBjVqCZaXfrn090Nrh8ZT9DG22KWfYtEUE5AonkjhF/n5blpwonX23EC zVDtD4bgJfq2PL0O7q1yG3Ef+83DEJh26tR6CmjAgUSnY6MGWVXIs2tpr Ii1f+TOyqkcySSJk6KLFQpZ85ncF6IGRYi0uxtzxezw8pDSI9xB8+hp45 0=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AgUFAIgfcFKtJXG+/2dsb2JhbABZgweBDL81gS0WdIIlAQEBAwE4Aj8FCwsYIwtXBg6IBga6V49BB4QsA55Gi0yBaIE/gik
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.93,595,1378857600"; d="scan'208";a="278129428"
Received: from rcdn-core2-3.cisco.com ([173.37.113.190]) by rcdn-iport-2.cisco.com with ESMTP; 29 Oct 2013 20:53:05 +0000
Received: from xhc-rcd-x04.cisco.com (xhc-rcd-x04.cisco.com [173.37.183.78]) by rcdn-core2-3.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r9TKr5tR018153 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Tue, 29 Oct 2013 20:53:05 GMT
Received: from [10.61.200.140] (10.61.200.140) by xhc-rcd-x04.cisco.com (173.37.183.78) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.2.318.4; Tue, 29 Oct 2013 15:52:58 -0500
Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2013 21:52:40 +0100
From: Andrew Yourtchenko <ayourtch@cisco.com>
X-X-Sender: ayourtch@ayourtch-mac
To: Brian Haberman <brian@innovationslab.net>
In-Reply-To: <527019EC.3090508@innovationslab.net>
Message-ID: <alpine.OSX.2.00.1310292134210.31066@ayourtch-mac>
References: <CE8E8EC3.59F3A%victor@jvknet.com> <06601039-CAFD-49B0-918B-A8ACD51B978D@fugue.com> <alpine.OSX.2.00.1310281905440.11422@ayourtch-mac> <CAKD1Yr0qLd7syFizEUMa6DM2a2LY6Rv5GSFyoQAs4Pir6gcNkA@mail.gmail.com> <1383036443.56704.YahooMailNeo@web142501.mail.bf1.yahoo.com> <alpine.OSX.2.00.1310291443480.31066@ayourtch-mac> <1383074208.73179.YahooMailNeo@web142505.mail.bf1.yahoo.com> <alpine.OSX.2.00.1310292030450.31066@ayourtch-mac> <CAKD1Yr1myWu7BUmcP3sJqPXFtRyGhy=Qqd2yMsYBFQjPce3GUA@mail.gmail.com> <alpine.OSX.2.00.1310292040510.31066@ayourtch-mac> <527019EC.3090508@innovationslab.net>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (OSX 1167 2008-08-23)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"; format="flowed"
X-Originating-IP: [10.61.200.140]
Cc: v6ops@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [v6ops] DHCPv6/SLAAC Make Hosts Confusing-//RE: new draft: draft-liu-bonica-v6ops-dhcpv6-slaac-problem
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/v6ops>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2013 20:53:26 -0000

On Tue, 29 Oct 2013, Brian Haberman wrote:

> Hi Andrew,
>
> On 10/29/13 4:20 PM, Andrew Yourtchenko wrote:
>>
>>
>> Take a look and see if this captures the things any better.
>>
>> It's a very tricky section. There's an intertwine of "DHCPv6 was not
>> allowed to do any routing" + the implicit "I got an RA therefore
>> that router exists" (though "I got a DHCP offer from that router
>> therefore that router exists" is also can be argued for) + the
>
> But you do not know that the DHCPv6 message you received came from a
> router or a server.

Thanks. Not sure whether it should actually be another section or not - 
"Control plane and data plane" - RAs are sent by an entity that is in the 
path, whereas the DHCPv6 may be sent by an off-path entity...

--a

>
> Regards,
> Brian
>
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email