IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] PCP server in draft-ietf-v6ops-6204bis

james woodyatt <jhw@apple.com> Sun, 29 January 2012 17:51 UTC

Return-Path: <jhw@apple.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 64FC321F859B; Sun, 29 Jan 2012 09:51:54 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -110.598
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-110.598 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id P7c-GgRZghCi; Sun, 29 Jan 2012 09:51:53 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-out.apple.com (crispin.apple.com [17.151.62.50]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E163221F858F; Sun, 29 Jan 2012 09:51:53 -0800 (PST)
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Boundary_(ID_/EjFAwBgv5Eye98+843R4A)"
Received: from relay13.apple.com ([17.128.113.29]) by mail-out.apple.com (Oracle Communications Messaging Server 7u4-23.01 (7.0.4.23.0) 64bit (built Aug 10 2011)) with ESMTPS id <0LYK00MMXMYEFM00@mail-out.apple.com>; Sun, 29 Jan 2012 09:51:53 -0800 (PST)
X-AuditID: 1180711d-b7b41ae000004823-3f-4f258738334b
Received: from kallisti.apple.com (kallisti.apple.com [17.193.13.64]) (using TLS with cipher AES128-SHA (AES128-SHA/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by relay13.apple.com (Apple SCV relay) with SMTP id 40.58.18467.937852F4; Sun, 29 Jan 2012 09:51:53 -0800 (PST)
From: james woodyatt <jhw@apple.com>
In-reply-to: <201201291608.q0TG8oCF098440@givry.fdupont.fr>
Date: Sun, 29 Jan 2012 09:51:52 -0800
Message-id: <85BE2EBF-C8AC-45E1-BF93-1E3066AD3172@apple.com>
References: <201201291608.q0TG8oCF098440@givry.fdupont.fr>
To: Francis Dupont <Francis.Dupont@fdupont.fr>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1251.1)
X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFrrMLMWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsUieJDXQdeyXdXfoG2OmMXNqxdZLB5N28lq 0bbhFYvF5GO/WS1OH9vL7MDqMeX3RlaPd1P/sHosWfKTyePL5c9sASxRXDYpqTmZZalF+nYJ XBnHjh5hLfgsXfF+UkID42aJLkZODgkBE4l/d26wQdhiEhfurQeyuTiEBGYzSdyZfI8RJCEs YC2xt/0RK4jNK2AssebWOxYQm1kgQeLroyawOJuAisS3y3eZQGxOoPqzH3eB1bAIqEq03W9l hKivkFi9aTk7xBwbiUVth8HqhQSsJDY96QCLiwjoSby7epAd4iB5iZavd9gmMPLNQrJ6FpLV ELa2xLKFr5lnMXIA2ToSkxcyogpD2B/PH2FawMi2ilGwKDUnsdLQWC+xoCAnVS85P3cTIyio GwpldzDu/8l/iFGAg1GJh/fkUhV/IdbEsuLK3EOMEhzMSiK8jjOBQrwpiZVVqUX58UWlOanF hxilOViUxHk3WSv7CwmkJ5akZqemFqQWwWSZODilGhjj51qvnXvP8cDMFW4C/40emhtfvTL1 +aL42Sure+MUV1ycd5HJey0TP2/6P9W5WYlsGn+sDv/Q6JjaN+Vc78kdrLnbLfnkra5P19/J dfZI5uqHPi+P3iy4edDZdt3xw3bvKm2fM7me4E0uv79OMObZlpYKlg/Fm+8s+/DW9E3JapeU 3A9qvEt2KrEUZyQaajEXFScCAMd/JlRmAgAA
Cc: v6ops@ietf.org, pcp@ietf.org, "Ole Troan (otroan)" <otroan@cisco.com>, draft-ietf-v6ops-6204bis@tools.ietf.org
Subject: Re: [v6ops] PCP server in draft-ietf-v6ops-6204bis
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/v6ops>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 29 Jan 2012 17:51:54 -0000

On Jan 29, 2012, at 08:08 , Francis Dupont wrote:
> 
> UPnP IGD v2 does the job, it was just published after the PCP effort beginning.


Was it published under terms that permit IETF to cite it in a standards track document as a normative requirement?  This has, in the past, been a problem with UPnP IGDv1.


--
j h woodyatt <jhw@apple.com>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email