Re: [v6ops] draft-templin-v6ops-pdhost-15 (was: Re: Loopback interface terminology issue)
Fred Baker <fredbaker.ietf@gmail.com> Thu, 19 October 2017 18:11 UTC
Return-Path: <fredbaker.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 39195134219 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 19 Oct 2017 11:11:46 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.7
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id i28NNI6_eTAo for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 19 Oct 2017 11:11:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-oi0-x231.google.com (mail-oi0-x231.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c06::231]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C0E70126E64 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Thu, 19 Oct 2017 11:11:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-oi0-x231.google.com with SMTP id j126so16309425oib.8 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Thu, 19 Oct 2017 11:11:44 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date:in-reply-to:cc:to :references; bh=6x/pE8fSsAp1V3wjqSMPHriLub7PmcF8Tgo0AzV4WKo=; b=SMXyDZiGgS6iP8d1AGEe9jVUbSTN7edoIeIoZiIoH8RObP/pg6XxzEUNLO6KAhAkfo 4rMd6mjoMDfrZnnJdrRSkGIEkoBH0WSXJu18dvzZTdxe9tNZcnIuHD7cDzt2qHSrdVQv 2LX3uvyXcVhj7cMOd01m/iEnY87w4RgneWFasUCNXK7uZKcLw5R6A9O5sZzGxlLW+Fvk Rc9ME9aw3Vxntley4IaYnu9tjGMjbwN97qARJ4zfW+BHg/BB5u7WT4PD/tSJfduS00cb oJ6o3n5sLwD+ZYWq64os21wJTk+XJRh48YkWXIB6XyzDlE6UoxHz6s/MsxAcx+WpI+Qo hZNw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date :in-reply-to:cc:to:references; bh=6x/pE8fSsAp1V3wjqSMPHriLub7PmcF8Tgo0AzV4WKo=; b=bhFX4ux+2z6smrpKNZVIEumZExi3sV+N2mpV4qOuaNHV0AmD+kpUWKSgXvuzfKsSCb rZVCUvqfeCF7pi5wHT2/sOwPYjLQhCKSPpHX1NQSDLJ9AnQdmK5fUftDjAhU3edUr2fV JRsZ700M20yQqIIFI1+tykSRSdVlpMVYp/162+EFAG7/9sPRno1Uxw8PdUey1StX85Lg d4Mcqck6pPMJ2rP5r24zNIRtlC5/ypE/4iGjAoUXE5pv/9XW5dVYD0WsEJW1WQ53dlYb ynbROnFtgKCSChdbbfy73tVrRLRRJw14PZ3O/xKEeV9asbaTfn5bo4EGGMghMjoSzLOI Qhbw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AMCzsaX/mn6OdlZjxa0S8VOtWCkh/eKPYyFTaNuunKt4XDMw1aDudSmo Ro65Gmz2d2kaatS7LWjd5OI=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABhQp+TZxzrvaEQg/BC9VQI9x/dEFnLvRjlGR9oLxuSt/tU+RwhBAwjIqA23EtjI5tufcbpOE4tGeg==
X-Received: by 10.202.46.21 with SMTP id u21mr1177834oiu.253.1508436704194; Thu, 19 Oct 2017 11:11:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ?IPv6:2600:8802:5600:e::11a6? ([2600:8802:5600:e::11a6]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id g3sm6949461otc.10.2017.10.19.11.11.42 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 19 Oct 2017 11:11:43 -0700 (PDT)
From: Fred Baker <fredbaker.ietf@gmail.com>
Message-Id: <D2C46E66-38A0-4E7A-80B3-94842DB0371D@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_69272122-E945-453C-B1ED-9451AC10CB5C"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha512"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 11.1 \(3445.4.7\))
Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2017 11:11:40 -0700
In-Reply-To: <20171019171123.GA878@faui40p.informatik.uni-erlangen.de>
Cc: Fred Templin <Fred.L.Templin@boeing.com>, Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>, v6ops@ietf.org
To: Toerless Eckert <tte+ietf@cs.fau.de>
References: <20171019171123.GA878@faui40p.informatik.uni-erlangen.de>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.4.7)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/F-sCz3dmtJpmLYsIrYqwOzZPVm8>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] draft-templin-v6ops-pdhost-15 (was: Re: Loopback interface terminology issue)
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2017 18:11:46 -0000
> On Oct 19, 2017, at 10:11 AM, Toerless Eckert <tte+ietf@cs.fau.de> wrote: > > a) Wrt to standardization Q: The draft does not have any MUST/SHOULD/MAY, so i am a bit > unsure what its asking to standardize. Eg: how would i verify if some implementation > claiming to support it complies with it ? RFC 2119 is not a requirement in a standard :-) The question would be whether the implementation implements what the document describes.
- [v6ops] draft-templin-v6ops-pdhost-15 (was: Re: L… Toerless Eckert
- Re: [v6ops] draft-templin-v6ops-pdhost-15 (was: R… Fred Baker
- Re: [v6ops] draft-templin-v6ops-pdhost-15 (was: R… Templin, Fred L