IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] I-D Action: draft-colitti-v6ops-host-addr-availability-01.txt

Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@google.com> Mon, 27 July 2015 08:28 UTC

Return-Path: <lorenzo@google.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EFEFB1AD0BB for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 27 Jul 2015 01:28:40 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.388
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.388 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id bxZwW5GjNbhR for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 27 Jul 2015 01:28:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-yk0-x233.google.com (mail-yk0-x233.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4002:c07::233]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 846521A9055 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Mon, 27 Jul 2015 01:28:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by ykay190 with SMTP id y190so63337977yka.3 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Mon, 27 Jul 2015 01:28:39 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=TpShaq3/3BxqWNRd7/wRSHwjC2WF7XXptk/DRzqZSu8=; b=OyyMpkRZchnkFlvnEjqosPbXusR5F4Ep60O7757y252sMK1xTU10LZGFIxNKwx0o3y 1Yw9Jh9RcyF06RzhJ/E1QdNOyvh8eL3tOqSUcPLSc0nKu/x1cOiV6jWxyrf1tqXN4Fb0 VKEnwtU8Dioe2wIfYqoIhzzO5BhDE366vZrRStj/oJ74JqjKkqvc5go+BTHwJw48/xy4 +cWBFOKgEMhv7g4NTSw+jVzxAz7MqQtDmrdxRymWphtU1GE1tPLBysIWiXDcvt2T6Us3 7DnrbB4Rbr3qYRQL13uzD3EV3su8l09CEDtgfAEAWucWmNrunFhZy4PcD/zUGrzumuVZ nZrw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=TpShaq3/3BxqWNRd7/wRSHwjC2WF7XXptk/DRzqZSu8=; b=jMRXU8E2VvXNKVYnoNtNwHu2nmkDdM7MD62ocl1e/DVNv3du5Oo6DmkGfIfFUZFVMQ wTn6z8+QuiLpYKeitjTzXYWE1CWd+Syv24i+9PD9GbhchdRiM1WGhpr15l5l4nWWvKuN vDr3fiksHAPMqJ5nvlUAdTfu0HyC/Sbbyo6iVDOtCp+ugWccpUDFwavQeY7fpCFrwAYU k1AzO9CWoj5jICAA3iRl6PJOj5fEn33KVfSUsQBG3NN57RKWpMpokRCAP+Hj2n8ZbZwT JDH7OA35ApOTKDeYJsq/JSxVcr+xrJIjXEYh5cVIIbtGPr1usGnVURWAchI2+AkXP8e5 z12w==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQldZ+5bhogZhk7dQd5kj7aSg5nQXgR6nKBmpULsQ78rZiffTRwEALdcCyGOcAVEiI9lxOQJ
X-Received: by 10.129.77.213 with SMTP id a204mr29696314ywb.40.1437985718829; Mon, 27 Jul 2015 01:28:38 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.37.8.201 with HTTP; Mon, 27 Jul 2015 01:28:19 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <m1ZJdjZ-0000CcC@stereo.hq.phicoh.net>
References: <20150723130715.12113.47480.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <55B1ED14.6030501@gmail.com> <m1ZIZ4w-0000CbC@stereo.hq.phicoh.net> <CAKD1Yr2z6T86gmQMPZwbgFB4mdt7=xWNuei5jaQg=vpG7-zLVg@mail.gmail.com> <m1ZJdjZ-0000CcC@stereo.hq.phicoh.net>
From: Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@google.com>
Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2015 17:28:19 +0900
Message-ID: <CAKD1Yr0+g5i6Ocoxxiyt4QowL1Kfx7PqC9uBPF4dts6RF9Wbnw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Philip Homburg <pch-v6ops-3@u-1.phicoh.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a1140c552f6f0fc051bd723c2"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/F9i4vwVq71iExQ9wnw2LHfOkqf4>
Cc: IPv6 Operations <v6ops@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] I-D Action: draft-colitti-v6ops-host-addr-availability-01.txt
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2015 08:28:41 -0000

On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 5:26 PM, Philip Homburg <pch-v6ops-3@u-1.phicoh.com>
wrote:

> >In practice, in a homenet network it will make sense to use SLAAC instead
> >of DHCPv6 PD. The recommendation for PD is to use DHCPv6 PD if a network
> >"requires explicit requests for address space", i.e., if SLAAC is not
> >available.
>
> I didn't keep track, did homenet explictly pick SLAAC over DHCPv6?


I don't think the architecture specifies anything. That said, because
homenet is dynamic and many hosts don't support RECONFIGURE, using stateful
DHCPv6 in the home is likely a bad idea because it will break things when
renumbering.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email