IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] Is there a problem? [was: Why enterprises aren't adopting IPv6]

Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> Thu, 30 September 2021 20:52 UTC

Return-Path: <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF7B63A11ED for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 30 Sep 2021 13:52:34 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.1
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.1 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id fZaHOtomSHgU for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 30 Sep 2021 13:52:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pg1-x52e.google.com (mail-pg1-x52e.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::52e]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 40BB43A11E5 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Thu, 30 Sep 2021 13:52:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pg1-x52e.google.com with SMTP id a73so4516994pge.0 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Thu, 30 Sep 2021 13:52:30 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=F0mE2KARmO/LVzQ2L6Y0lxbehyVH2/i4EGfAA5uS/qk=; b=golBgLjUJm7yHorjyW5gQHM0x3rx/4+KC8MnhDkFtpm+ZOA3+XCNOSwmcXy6dLRHT3 s+Kx022kHbsIgJ5tsnIf/sdrUEOGlucWdTzPsAmG192oSzaB3iuLhL3s5sC0f06JaU3A pc1MhLUxVgecv0353GmnXLtne8hz67wOltZ5XYVweGf0uLsbltrCjJp4jzInNZhKw+Vw SwO6UvhRIApEVJNlbP5lH0A9fwciJWz3CAQuoGKuU3wH0GpbuL4nt2sCrBEsWGrcMUkP P3TcwfNlm8iPboYcd1OLS0do182rLDiFNRCSl9EC9EtysxVR8h+F9Pk/6AF1xykUHs1w YkWQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=F0mE2KARmO/LVzQ2L6Y0lxbehyVH2/i4EGfAA5uS/qk=; b=wy/zX+JXOWzzzA3F5NnY3PmpTNc+lCHYZmiconlr99TRVa3Rmbw2bKNYnLpF6D9e/R TKusTVdQhPpADmJHoTiCN3CxNa4gSbkff8G44uYOPdv3EQRwfm4ie6Ta0lAQOwgkphS8 /qjDdwCb0izJFrK88bNbzsBovdCYS8tADOrwZ6XyPO9PcNFlCBffR7ZnWZiWj/c4Nt0W xSTZ+BHaa9pnaj6Q20mDnXzlMFCfGT9xOEjO4llhw6eqSCIqK6Z6J9G5VgyasPJ0d5ew 8t2UH0AO7WlE6XgGwhEqXl8tNdJC8oItzR7btKhb1xpQASRFkbRPfpvB30IMBzBWH22Z NuUg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533DuRrejW0Hvk4fj5yjVJoZBb7sC7EtLCo4GwQEs5/QNWCz06Pz VsszKWrnUXu7Yp4MUKu6lPY=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzaJ8Wh0+uGb3oxmdLlV99KlQE/v1DbXxmhZ+CcVQ+Uaz7IKDznzrkWGgSzAJfRUpWuhd/qKg==
X-Received: by 2002:aa7:9e49:0:b0:44b:2a06:715e with SMTP id z9-20020aa79e49000000b0044b2a06715emr6420320pfq.78.1633035149403; Thu, 30 Sep 2021 13:52:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ?IPv6:2406:e003:11aa:d701:80b2:5c79:2266:e431? ([2406:e003:11aa:d701:80b2:5c79:2266:e431]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id y76sm4052380pfc.219.2021.09.30.13.52.26 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 30 Sep 2021 13:52:28 -0700 (PDT)
To: Gert Doering <gert@space.net>
Cc: otroan@employees.org, Jen Linkova <furry@google.com>, V6 Ops List <v6ops@ietf.org>, Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo=40google.com@dmarc.ietf.org>, Owen DeLong <owen=40delong.com@dmarc.ietf.org>
References: <0B533C71-5DB0-410D-A5A3-7E8FD559F214@delong.com> <CAKD1Yr3NoYfNT7+OVJoCCdgdif6AHHw29tNCPttS=-NuRZKv3w@mail.gmail.com> <DM6PR02MB692426B0EEDDC2C4D78D8EC0C3A89@DM6PR02MB6924.namprd02.prod.outlook.com> <CAKD1Yr25dtinLBeJpAuJ17NfLg7-ewM9QPvnXNuEJ8wiBQV9ig@mail.gmail.com> <CAO42Z2zqf=F6OTDK2e8cMYXdPgMZ=SgFJcn7BTKYGgcYsLT2iw@mail.gmail.com> <894BCFE9-0811-4AE6-9941-6183292E4431@delong.com> <7E8C5F52-596F-4CAB-89EB-B0D5BAF5F612@employees.org> <YVXvgS6GDX97sHOW@Space.Net> <4AF3C29B-4642-4173-A027-0AAAEE65C869@employees.org> <71a223dd-1f92-a397-0f26-7d6032377787@gmail.com> <YVYfgzONVaDYaZKK@Space.Net>
From: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <a5fe1fd6-3a71-c0cc-51e8-1bbc48102111@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 01 Oct 2021 09:52:24 +1300
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.10.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <YVYfgzONVaDYaZKK@Space.Net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/FCKO0e1FQXsinP6xluvp1vDaPvE>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] Is there a problem? [was: Why enterprises aren't adopting IPv6]
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2021 20:52:35 -0000

On 01-Oct-21 09:35, Gert Doering wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On Fri, Oct 01, 2021 at 08:32:42AM +1300, Brian E Carpenter wrote:
>> We designed for co-existence, despite calling it "transition".
>>
>> We have co-existence, and no drop-dead date for IPv4.
>>
>> Why is this a problem?
> 
> Co-existence means it's easy to avoid doing IPv6 at all, because everyone
> else will (have to!) find a way to cope with such laziness.
> 
> Thus, DS-lite, CGN, NAT64, ...

Sure, we should definitely stop working on any more RFCs in this area,
except perhaps how-to guides.

(But I don't think it's laziness, it's short-term thinking.)

    Brian

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email