IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] Please review the No IPv4 draft

Simon Perreault <simon.perreault@viagenie.ca> Tue, 15 April 2014 13:14 UTC

Return-Path: <simon.perreault@viagenie.ca>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 29A221A0258 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 15 Apr 2014 06:14:07 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.173
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.173 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.272, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 82TKZmTwtDyY for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 15 Apr 2014 06:14:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from jazz.viagenie.ca (jazz.viagenie.ca [IPv6:2620:0:230:8000::2]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 27DA41A0114 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Tue, 15 Apr 2014 06:14:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from porto.nomis80.org (unknown [IPv6:2620:0:230:c000:2520:ef8a:477:622f]) by jazz.viagenie.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 05A63403E0; Tue, 15 Apr 2014 09:13:58 -0400 (EDT)
Message-ID: <534D3096.8090202@viagenie.ca>
Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2014 09:13:58 -0400
From: Simon Perreault <simon.perreault@viagenie.ca>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.4.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Owen DeLong <owen@delong.com>
References: <534BF5A5.5010609@viagenie.ca> <534BFA08.3030404@foobar.org> <49EA8AC9-D5C5-4FE5-9A10-0CD574782F0F@nominum.com> <534C07FC.8000907@foobar.org> <F08AF14D-22C6-4F4C-9388-670EB4CD8453@nominum.com> <534C17B8.8030209@foobar.org> <534C27C9.80701@viagenie.ca> <3DFC20FF-E866-4E1C-B720-D7C91CBB925B@delong.com> <534C40A5.9050302@viagenie.ca> <1DA9DEFD-8BD8-45C2-AD82-339EF2A289B8@delong.com>
In-Reply-To: <1DA9DEFD-8BD8-45C2-AD82-339EF2A289B8@delong.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/FK9EyLl1sS_233C1tWdUh-XNAyY
Cc: v6ops@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [v6ops] Please review the No IPv4 draft
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2014 13:14:07 -0000

Le 2014-04-14 16:39, Owen DeLong a écrit :
>>> Why wouldn’t a network that does not offer IPv4 autoconfigration 
>>> not want to implement that option whether or not they do DHCPv6?
>> 
>> Not sure what you mean. Our draft does specify RA and DHCPv6 
>> versions of the No-IPv4 option.
> 
> Not responsive to the above statement. It is possible that there are 
> networks which do not implement IPv4 auto configuration that would 
> want to use this option that also do not do IPv6. For example, a 
> statically addressed IPv4 Wireless network may want to turn off 
> clients sending DHCP discovers.

Are you saying we should be trying to make non-IPv6 networks work
better? Because we totally don't care about those.

> I’m talking about the fact that this option could, in fact, be useful
> for some IPv4-only networks as well.

We don't care about IPv4-only networks.

Simon
-- 
DTN made easy, lean, and smart --> http://postellation.viagenie.ca
NAT64/DNS64 open-source        --> http://ecdysis.viagenie.ca
STUN/TURN server               --> http://numb.viagenie.ca

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email