[v6ops] Joint meeting of sunset4 and v6ops

"Fred Baker (fred)" <fred@cisco.com> Thu, 25 June 2015 13:04 UTC

Return-Path: <fred@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 93ACB1A8756; Thu, 25 Jun 2015 06:04:54 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -114.511
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-114.511 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id MyPXDuoLauYR; Thu, 25 Jun 2015 06:04:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from alln-iport-8.cisco.com (alln-iport-8.cisco.com [173.37.142.95]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5404B1A6FE7; Thu, 25 Jun 2015 06:04:50 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=2615; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1435237490; x=1436447090; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:mime-version; bh=LWkTWKV3AM+ro/i0rKZ9J0d4byirDuxgqHN/r52UgtU=; b=UbPwwiUesmOpRPxI57dluev2OzBx/qsNr5A1Ml1NeN0SThpQe5rsVSXY Zt9XFlas7yqjFJlvLEs+a7gfJ5iEZH7wgMzN59vN6mttVhNN2GnsNdMPR pPo/fewXg7WKvZJYJvVgo3w7nc/7XUMh8okN95821PF+k1N8ynFrVe1JE E=;
X-Files: signature.asc : 833
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0C4AwAr+4tV/4UNJK1bgxFUZb0MCYFmhzk4FAEBAQEBAQGBCoQpgQsBgQAnBAEgiCENzhQBAQEBAQEBAQIBAQEBAQEBAQEVBJNugRQFlAUBgiOBUIddmDgmg3qCNYECAQEB
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.13,677,1427760000"; d="asc'?scan'208";a="162730406"
Received: from alln-core-11.cisco.com ([173.36.13.133]) by alln-iport-8.cisco.com with ESMTP; 25 Jun 2015 13:04:49 +0000
Received: from xhc-aln-x04.cisco.com (xhc-aln-x04.cisco.com [173.36.12.78]) by alln-core-11.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id t5PD4ngS018022 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Thu, 25 Jun 2015 13:04:49 GMT
Received: from xmb-rcd-x09.cisco.com ([169.254.9.49]) by xhc-aln-x04.cisco.com ([173.36.12.78]) with mapi id 14.03.0195.001; Thu, 25 Jun 2015 08:04:49 -0500
From: "Fred Baker (fred)" <fred@cisco.com>
To: "sunset4@ietf.org" <sunset4@ietf.org>, v6ops list <v6ops@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: Joint meeting of sunset4 and v6ops
Thread-Index: AQHQr0eE1uVq+d5bDkODMombi+a8Sg==
Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2015 13:04:49 +0000
Message-ID: <8ECE38A2-71FE-4C33-A573-BBF5DFAB1CD9@cisco.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach: yes
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.24.244.209]
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_72FD86AA-85FD-49B2-8A48-DBB3B4E2E8B1"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/FKldcNCt4zTsWTUd1iU8z1FTVTc>
Subject: [v6ops] Joint meeting of sunset4 and v6ops
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2015 13:04:54 -0000

The chairs of sunset4 and v6ops have been discussing our work plans, and feel it would be useful to meet jointly at IETF 93. I have just posted a preliminary agenda, for working group comment, at https://www.ietf.org/proceedings/93/agenda/agenda-93-v6ops.

That agenda basically breaks two 2-hour slots into four one-hour slots. One such slot will be used by each working group to discuss documents currently on the table, which are a total of five documents - two in sunset4 and three in v6ops. We would like to invite two or three European ISPs to discuss their IPv6 deployments (which we have not lined up - any volunteers?), and we would like to spend an hour on charter discussions.

At this point, neither v6ops nor sunset4 have new drafts. I am expecting a respin of draft-ietf-v6ops-siit-dc and draft-ietf-v6ops-siit-dc-2xlat, which we should finalize at this meeting, and I am expecting a respin of draft-ietf-v6ops-ipv6-ehs-in-real-world responding to the "next steps" thread of May 6-7. If new drafts come in for v6ops, we will likely either find a way for a different working group to look at them (one draft I have heard proposed probably belongs in 6man), discuss them if we have time, or discuss on-list for the present.