IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] Multicast problem in IPv6 address management

Vasilenko Eduard <vasilenko.eduard@huawei.com> Wed, 12 August 2020 16:56 UTC

Return-Path: <vasilenko.eduard@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E0AA3A13D7; Wed, 12 Aug 2020 09:56:38 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id LrL6DI6wW3VB; Wed, 12 Aug 2020 09:56:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [185.176.76.210]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 631F93A13C8; Wed, 12 Aug 2020 09:56:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lhreml743-chm.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.18.7.108]) by Forcepoint Email with ESMTP id 43BA3D769F0AA841EAF8; Wed, 12 Aug 2020 17:56:34 +0100 (IST)
Received: from msceml704-chm.china.huawei.com (10.219.141.143) by lhreml743-chm.china.huawei.com (10.201.108.193) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.1913.5; Wed, 12 Aug 2020 17:56:34 +0100
Received: from msceml703-chm.china.huawei.com (10.219.141.161) by msceml704-chm.china.huawei.com (10.219.141.143) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.1913.5; Wed, 12 Aug 2020 19:56:33 +0300
Received: from msceml703-chm.china.huawei.com ([10.219.141.161]) by msceml703-chm.china.huawei.com ([10.219.141.161]) with mapi id 15.01.1913.007; Wed, 12 Aug 2020 19:56:33 +0300
From: Vasilenko Eduard <vasilenko.eduard@huawei.com>
To: Joe Touch <touch@strayalpha.com>
CC: "Pascal Thubert (pthubert)" <pthubert=40cisco.com@dmarc.ietf.org>, Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com>, "v6ops@ietf.org" <v6ops@ietf.org>, IPv6 List <ipv6@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [v6ops] Multicast problem in IPv6 address management
Thread-Index: AdZwipzxSyA49jGGRsKhoVN1GRZp7wAIQhqAAAdmIqA=
Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2020 16:56:33 +0000
Message-ID: <54d926767ff14e6d98a034f525e5521f@huawei.com>
References: <fa3788c64f1a4c3b8fea99536a08dcb3@huawei.com> <242449E8-D0EF-428B-9975-5CF7C3423C89@strayalpha.com>
In-Reply-To: <242449E8-D0EF-428B-9975-5CF7C3423C89@strayalpha.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.47.204.11]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_54d926767ff14e6d98a034f525e5521fhuaweicom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/G4VNl1Xp4dVS-moqXOom0bpdNGQ>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] Multicast problem in IPv6 address management
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2020 16:56:39 -0000

Hi Joe,
I am not aware about any “Intellectual Property Rights” in respect of discussed.
And I have not understood how “Ethernet Automatic Protection Switching (Version 1)” could help for Wireless.
I strongly suspect that you mistyped RFC number.
Eduard
From: Joe Touch [mailto:touch@strayalpha.com]
Sent: 12 августа 2020 г. 19:23
To: Vasilenko Eduard <vasilenko.eduard@huawei.com>
Cc: Pascal Thubert (pthubert) <pthubert=40cisco.com@dmarc.ietf.org>; Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com>; v6ops@ietf.org; IPv6 List <ipv6@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] Multicast problem in IPv6 address management

See rfc3619 Sections 5 and 6.

Joe


On Aug 12, 2020, at 3:51 AM, Vasilenko Eduard <vasilenko.eduard@huawei.com<mailto:vasilenko.eduard@huawei.com>> wrote:
Hi all,
This dispute is about: Should we assume that Multicast is the basic technology available on any L2? Should we rely fundamental mechanisms on Multicast?

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email