IETF Logo Mail Archive

[v6ops] Re: [E] New Version Notification for draft-mishra-v6ops-variable-iids-problem-statement-01.txt

Gert Doering <gert@space.net> Thu, 19 September 2024 16:16 UTC

Return-Path: <gert@space.net>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE448C1D5C6E for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 19 Sep 2024 09:16:47 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.807
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.807 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=space.net
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id X0YhT2Fkp_pL for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 19 Sep 2024 09:16:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from gatekeeper1-relay.space.net (gatekeeper1-relay.space.net [IPv6:2001:608:3:85::38]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-ECDSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 35F0FC1D5C45 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Thu, 19 Sep 2024 09:16:42 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=space.net; i=@space.net; q=dns/txt; s=esa; t=1726762604; x=1758298604; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=zjW9ML6G3fvxpzZRlTMAMtqjt1b7z2yunv+ZIENgDR8=; b=fw9I9ooYtKrmKzHC0Qj8qXlXpo/RbucHZKvjTWwwYsjvj/RgvSQz9Z70 6FELwvQtXkERV3cvbVP/AK0Cv13e/PXsUNxQiPVj061nSli2tDWWqV6XA zhpbMNNsSFZpeUhIX/t70yXF15FtEmONu87RtPDjGWEFpgw8ydwYHT8+e 9TOxU4KLko21lvZXR+F9uel+jbh3sCenTOtb2tFYdC3NSbnH0qygG50kF 7Ej8UAe9MLtj9LmmrNILVVO02rXb4CCG9jd1k/eeKweu3vzNB+rW8EF52 VAO3Ik4HD07K6Q7adDyEzefVsTSoquKu1J1num6iSGk9ULYvdiyQDjaEz A==;
X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: 5DBkTmiPRWOvdJYmqcUPyQ==
X-CSE-MsgGUID: yEnOTX29Rd+kyrFrFGAZJg==
X-SpaceNet-SBRS: None
Received: from mobil.space.net ([195.30.115.67]) by gatekeeper1-relay.space.net with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 19 Sep 2024 18:16:39 +0200
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietf.org
Received: from mobil.space.net (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by mobil.space.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id D518518056C1 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Thu, 19 Sep 2024 18:16:38 +0200 (CEST)
X-SpaceNet-Relay: true
Received: from moebius4.space.net (moebius4.space.net [IPv6:2001:608:2:2::251]) by mobil.space.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id C5112180DF89; Thu, 19 Sep 2024 18:16:38 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by moebius4.space.net (Postfix, from userid 1007) id BDDBC13B92; Thu, 19 Sep 2024 18:16:38 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Thu, 19 Sep 2024 18:16:38 +0200
From: Gert Doering <gert@space.net>
To: Brian Candler <brian@nsrc.org>
Message-ID: <ZuxOZtHQNc2fLKRY@Space.Net>
References: <CAJhXr986yXVysGf6QQLvWYudQMYf+zMQ3BJrrNaj7L6hfu1xjg@mail.gmail.com> <CABNhwV1dspJRUZ15eX0sWupEAg+pLAp-3GMA5dEKF-X04MwQRw@mail.gmail.com> <CABNhwV0zP5C2uCcki=g7WDb_0Aqs8Q=15SV1r8yNM3E7-b+fVg@mail.gmail.com> <eb8789d5-dab1-af90-b40a-672d27d26198@foobar.org> <ZusLvEDEBs7R4HOt@Space.Net> <CAKD1Yr3qdqMNPJa7bietzat5HFM4g=OLHeJQgvc+tktd4+rW8w@mail.gmail.com> <A83B7972-6937-42FF-947F-47A9C0E8DBA5@gmail.com> <CAO42Z2ySu5mAFg26ZJR5sPFnYrgB3wCkYaA72RzMFNKKQr5fpg@mail.gmail.com> <ZuxEdwwAw4EkvDH7@Space.Net> <f74270ff-ba7b-40d7-8fc3-45a24613c8be@nsrc.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha256"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="ZgBofsnJESFHVPwv"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <f74270ff-ba7b-40d7-8fc3-45a24613c8be@nsrc.org>
Message-ID-Hash: ZTN64CGPUO2OPXY2Z3SDKRD3X42L24KA
X-Message-ID-Hash: ZTN64CGPUO2OPXY2Z3SDKRD3X42L24KA
X-MailFrom: gert@space.net
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-v6ops.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
CC: Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo=40google.com@dmarc.ietf.org>, IPv6 Operations <v6ops@ietf.org>
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc4
Precedence: list
Subject: [v6ops] Re: [E] New Version Notification for draft-mishra-v6ops-variable-iids-problem-statement-01.txt
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/GKthwwB9s3fbQoXglnFusu5pZxw>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:v6ops-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:v6ops-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:v6ops-leave@ietf.org>

Hi,

On Thu, Sep 19, 2024 at 04:55:15PM +0100, Brian Candler wrote:
> If a host needs (say) ten IPv6 addresses, then forcing it to ask for 2^64
> addresses via DHCP seems bizarre to me, and immediately generates an
> artificial shortage.

That particular ship has sailed... the WG has decided that it has 
consensus on draft-ietf-v6ops-dhcp-pd-per-device (seems to be not
an RFC yet, but "Submitted to IESG for Publication").

There was much argument that "the delegated prefix size needs to work
with SLAAC", so, here we are - if we want a bit less unreasonable address
usage, "make SLAAC and dhcp-pd-per-device work with /80s".

Gert Doering
        -- NetMaster
-- 
have you enabled IPv6 on something today...?

SpaceNet AG                      Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard, Ingo Lalla,
                                           Karin Schuler, Sebastian Cler
Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14        Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann
D-80807 Muenchen                 HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen)
Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444         USt-IdNr.: DE813185279

v2.43.4 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status