[v6ops] draft-ietf-v6ops-cpe-slaac-renum to BCP?
Fred Baker <fredbaker.ietf@gmail.com> Wed, 27 January 2021 16:05 UTC
Return-Path: <fredbaker.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D11D53A0A8E for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 27 Jan 2021 08:05:23 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.099
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.099 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2cB3QNO-MhpU for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 27 Jan 2021 08:05:22 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-pj1-x1036.google.com (mail-pj1-x1036.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::1036]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 27E393A0A65 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Wed, 27 Jan 2021 08:05:22 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-pj1-x1036.google.com with SMTP id jx18so1629126pjb.5 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Wed, 27 Jan 2021 08:05:22 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:mime-version:subject:message-id:date:to; bh=ACPPzUb6kItgpK+GJ7o5zrDOmXr6hlrefN5GrkRsXSo=; b=hVUFycrojY5ChwnfnQBAnAommMrnAZHH78/AYqTUnvVe+3rFKVyZXBmOj6gxgwyZOd y8yEq9+jh66ixFrCLFkPjhZz5BJvPUT87SP4j+jqTebThVzNeRwlIVpIW1vwSSa6qlLa Lp6IGDgOPnep8PXYQvS2MNKRccwoQJ2x/k+qzxM3cdjcXtokzTkqUHh++3VSvsVEV/ke bIQGlHL/Kd8tFnZs8qrixkAr3v3fzS9s31ORBCybHSBdGeUBTNzb4PU/+wwERC2vxg5a 7BWvXfkI9FjuPugsXJuEurPNg/BRWvA7quawd2DGKZui649DRWtJrSY4MrK5Arx+wroK 2PAA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:mime-version:subject:message-id:date:to; bh=ACPPzUb6kItgpK+GJ7o5zrDOmXr6hlrefN5GrkRsXSo=; b=owVsm+JuizRhHbQPwHKer99BnzSOKr2fzjxsbJkPICLt4T1JhnXWEODpb0oOvNDLI6 3818FLMGYxBD436GP9kmHQ8JSmlOUPjS3UWFQGqPP9qjA0YTyXWSi/xCuyno/NL4KAcQ dSx6JiRfL3tOE4iuZoTVnl4u5dfiIIua5xWkG2AfIKYnugKsOw+5KRW67F0BQj6jXFi3 gaQoZhl1NEaEhBDVCMvFDmZS7W1K3Jj5COL6A/8HqUc/9GH4QjtZnTkw1rM4/qTwsQWo Y6sgGqZIRE6w0KR0kwoqPs7vNzbea1sruGFiOAbYe53SdudovptZavFxF5AzG+CtG//8 yZnA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533dCQzaXadwAnWrKoxhv00ri3uxHcjpCIVJw8ncjE8e188SdS1M or6Y72zeT6X+2WF2NP3gaDbQGjx7ssM=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwzUFi3ZHWIm1r1piBsli7fgEriY41hGav/j9clDClH3P0vpAWknOUN+sajg4TEZEY5PU7hVQ==
X-Received: by 2002:a17:90a:f2c6:: with SMTP id gt6mr6393471pjb.35.1611763521517; Wed, 27 Jan 2021 08:05:21 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ?IPv6:2601:648:8200:dd20:f521:6171:1eb5:db72? ([2601:648:8200:dd20:f521:6171:1eb5:db72]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 184sm2797198pgi.92.2021.01.27.08.05.19 for <v6ops@ietf.org> (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 27 Jan 2021 08:05:20 -0800 (PST)
From: Fred Baker <fredbaker.ietf@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_C783AB2C-187D-4422-ACD3-4836644EA7C2"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha512"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 14.0 \(3654.60.0.2.21\))
Message-Id: <D9F54CBC-1429-4AC0-8F47-435F09FC27C5@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2021 08:05:18 -0800
To: IPv6 Operations <v6ops@ietf.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3654.60.0.2.21)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/GMFu9CC0H-WKM68JvZnbO-SvUCs>
Subject: [v6ops] draft-ietf-v6ops-cpe-slaac-renum to BCP?
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2021 16:05:24 -0000
We discussed draft-ietf-v6ops-cpe-slaac-renum and sent it to the IESG, whose primary comment was that it seemed like it should be BCP. They asked for an additional WGLC, so let's take a week (e.g., closes Feb 3) and ask whether the working group has any issues with that. The posted document targets BCP, so I expect that it should be such.
- [v6ops] draft-ietf-v6ops-cpe-slaac-renum to BCP? Fred Baker
- Re: [v6ops] draft-ietf-v6ops-cpe-slaac-renum to B… Warren Kumari
- Re: [v6ops] draft-ietf-v6ops-cpe-slaac-renum to B… Fernando Gont