IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] Fwd: 464XLAT Trial Deployment Report

Jeroen Massar <jeroen@unfix.org> Fri, 03 February 2012 21:21 UTC

Return-Path: <jeroen@unfix.org>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 80CD921F85E6 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 3 Feb 2012 13:21:46 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id wd5mlFHz7nPa for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 3 Feb 2012 13:21:46 -0800 (PST)
Received: from icaras.de.unfix.org (icaras.de.unfix.org [IPv6:2a01:4f8:130:74c1:5054:ff:fec4:f7d4]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6EF4E21F858B for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Fri, 3 Feb 2012 13:21:39 -0800 (PST)
Received: from yomi.ch.unfix.org (117-1.5-85.cust.bluewin.ch [85.5.1.117]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: jeroen) by icaras.de.unfix.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1CA33801BCC3; Fri, 3 Feb 2012 22:21:20 +0100 (CET)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=unfix.org; s=DKIM2009; t=1328304096; bh=xh4wthrSkrYJSWWsn9bvpMGg5S5QDQ353+bP9/djahU=; h=Message-ID:Date:From:MIME-Version:To:CC:Subject:References: In-Reply-To:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=qPw20ZwxFKLW92KE0rUDrxyMgrA9k/EdHS+ADCnHYKFkg/V3BNpAkFpqz3xd6V0y9 ADA7givoKqu9HJxPVk/LGj3mKnnt2sd0JrZBpfuokdYiku2zbMh8NtcQHGhQEKZZFw V+Bbr9ri/5Fc4cgFqNIe2NoTxGp4FyRrfIJ+TlJ9c9FZag7NVvMDifetVwUsLV+AUp jkagZ2uD+evii0E1VY7uoCGmbwBbVCaDRO/fZ4nLBWOM6hwrhT+NgPhf3k9zZR8fom s41zvfCXBEFDV4Ca13f9jD8cG5lEOr7GFJJ7zJ9EVyFruulqiyh8RoINDjuXrevZTd mlPMHI52ohrzQ==
Message-ID: <4F2C4FD1.1030901@unfix.org>
Date: Fri, 03 Feb 2012 22:21:21 +0100
From: Jeroen Massar <jeroen@unfix.org>
Organization: Unfix
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.7; rv:10.0) Gecko/20120129 Thunderbird/10.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
References: <CAD6AjGSRUdx32arseR26RzHNtMri8Vrif3dCQmuk7B52GmoHAw@mail.gmail.com> <FBD9BBC7-A537-4ABE-ABEB-76098F1BB415@cisco.com> <4F2C4854.40701@unfix.org> <m2pqdvaat4.wl%randy@psg.com>
In-Reply-To: <m2pqdvaat4.wl%randy@psg.com>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.3.5
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: v6ops v6ops WG <v6ops@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] Fwd: 464XLAT Trial Deployment Report
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/v6ops>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Feb 2012 21:21:46 -0000

On 2012-02-03 22:04 , Randy Bush wrote:
>> I very much appreciate the folks writing these operational reports.
>>
>> I do not think they fit in the RFC process, though they are great for
>> discussing pro's and con's about a certain solution. IMHO They are
>> much better fit for the various conferences out there.
> 
> excuse!  for many kinds of protocols, i-ds/rfcs of operability and
> interoperability are a required part of the ietf process.

If reports are indeed solely published in IETF-form then that is a good
way, if they though are published through other means then those can
serve already as stable references. Thus either/or IMHO.

Greets,
 Jeroen

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email