Re: [v6ops] draft-lmhp-v6ops-transition-comparison-06

Alexandre Petrescu <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com> Fri, 26 March 2021 16:41 UTC

Return-Path: <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF6BC3A22AA for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 26 Mar 2021 09:41:49 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.633
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.633 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.001, FORGED_GMAIL_RCVD=1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, NML_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_SOFTFAIL=0.665] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id SBsfe9gRpuoO for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 26 Mar 2021 09:41:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sainfoin-smtp-out.extra.cea.fr (sainfoin-smtp-out.extra.cea.fr [132.167.192.228]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 77FEA3A22A5 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Fri, 26 Mar 2021 09:41:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pisaure.intra.cea.fr (pisaure.intra.cea.fr [132.166.88.21]) by sainfoin-sys.extra.cea.fr (8.14.7/8.14.7/CEAnet-Internet-out-4.0) with ESMTP id 12QGfiOZ026469; Fri, 26 Mar 2021 17:41:44 +0100
Received: from pisaure.intra.cea.fr (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Postfix) with SMTP id D58702013F9; Fri, 26 Mar 2021 17:41:44 +0100 (CET)
Received: from muguet2-smtp-out.intra.cea.fr (muguet2-smtp-out.intra.cea.fr [132.166.192.13]) by pisaure.intra.cea.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id C73C82013D5; Fri, 26 Mar 2021 17:41:44 +0100 (CET)
Received: from [10.8.35.150] (is154594.intra.cea.fr [10.8.35.150]) by muguet2-sys.intra.cea.fr (8.14.7/8.14.7/CEAnet-Internet-out-4.0) with ESMTP id 12QGfiRp026626; Fri, 26 Mar 2021 17:41:44 +0100
To: Gert Doering <gert@space.net>
Cc: v6ops@ietf.org
References: <abe65114-d9c9-10ee-2c78-449051acbb61@hit.bme.hu> <3c50c72b-b606-a6cf-3095-f08ad48eecf5@gmail.com> <2A0C2B40-2DA4-4941-A09F-5BD31EDA3301@consulintel.es> <2e64b426-3a0a-b5f8-0306-005e9f1023d0@gmail.com> <72754d29-8b57-66fa-2b3a-fc6680c339f2@hit.bme.hu> <bdeec6da-3b2a-8cd4-e2d4-feb62c282c7d@gmail.com> <5E67F1F7-4065-4500-B722-D1E8E9458242@consulintel.es> <0db72084-5952-d8b0-c3ab-cc30d7325111@gmail.com> <DA520004-3768-4CA0-9A8F-9FDC76572AB5@consulintel.es> <1f1052d5-d89e-0c10-06f5-aa0c71405942@gmail.com> <YF4NVYguRgsyshJS@Space.Net>
From: Alexandre Petrescu <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <825adc8b-f55b-b3da-c71b-9941ae15d7a5@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2021 17:41:44 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.9.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <YF4NVYguRgsyshJS@Space.Net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Language: fr
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/H1X9UfWfKfu2s6Tlhj-rrs2Z76g>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] draft-lmhp-v6ops-transition-comparison-06
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2021 16:41:50 -0000


Le 26/03/2021 à 17:35, Gert Doering a écrit :
> Hi,
> 
> On Fri, Mar 26, 2021 at 04:20:39PM +0100, Alexandre Petrescu wrote:
>> Only smartphones Android and iOS allow for /64 prefix sharing.
>> They promote that functionality in an app.
>> 
>> Other IoT routers on 4G dont do that.
> 
> Nothing stops those other vendors from doing this.  It's not magic.
> 
> Android is even open source, so a linux based IoT router could just 
> copy the functionality from Android...
> 
> If you as a customer demand it, and order enough devices, vendors
> will deliver.  If you complain to IETF lists instead, nothing will
> happen.

Yes yes, I stop complaining.

But maybe I can tell you that me as a customer does not see the
organisation that is in charge and that can solve he problem, directly.

Me as a customer I acquire box that has many manufacturers inside.  Then
it goes via the operator as well.  I had to go through very many many
contacts with this.  I can tell you that the end user has nothing to say
or request.  The protocol decisions are made way far from what what the
end user (or maybe it's just me) needs :-)

Ok, I stop complaining here :-)

We wrote a personal submission Internet Draft about it and I leave it
there about v6ops WG :-)

Alex

> 
> Gert Doering -- NetMaster
>